I don’t think much of it. It’s one game and they game planned to play bully ball. If it becomes a multi game trend, ok. But for one game and a very good game plan? Nope, no knee jerk reaction here.
Sure.I don’t think much of it. It’s one game and they game planned to play bully ball. If it becomes a multi game trend, ok. But for one game and a very good game plan? Nope, no knee jerk reaction here.
I also looked at a picture of the play and saw Clark and Slay trailing. So they were the two players within the vicinity.Very Interesting...but stupid!
I just have a one word question for this mind boggling play call decision...
WHY?!?
Perfect time to be in a very conservative defense.
1. It was late in the game
2. We had a 2 score lead
3. You had back ups in the secondary due to injuries.
The only reason for their decision to call a "difficult" scheme that I can think of ....is Tomlin/Austin were looking for a splash play (int) to cement the deal?
However, that is a head scratcher because all we needed was a punt or stop on 4th down and games over. I might be open to their reasoning if the Vikings were on our side of the 50...but they were not, and maybe could somewhat understand it, if we still had all our starters on the field...
The very last thing we needed was a 80 plus yard pass play to the goal line!
41's hustle and amazing straight line speed, won that game for us.
Also noting our DC said that late CB snafu big play given up was on him with two CBs out he called a “difficult” play. (according to him)
But that just goes to the continual year to year players chronic episodic confusions on both sides of the ball.
Always comes back to coaching a recurring theme.