They literally have 3x as many first round picks as Georgia in the last ten years.
Success rate for nfl first round picks is roughly 50/50. Alabama is always far below that, at least in the Saben era.
I’m really not sure why but my only reasonable theory is character and intelligence.
Sent from my iPhone using
Steeler Nation mobile app
Who cares what the ratio is if they are bringing a plethora of talent in, the end result is they still produce. You can get caught up in percentages.
Doesn't really weigh in on a round 1 talent. Didn't stop the Pats from drafting their Alabama LBer, and wouldn't stop the Steelers from drafting theirs. If they deemed him a BPA.
Is some of them products of their system? Getting the most out of their college player, and in that aspect making a prospect look more attractive. As in maxed out? Some play out that way sure.
So if you have ten on the table, you want to play out which ones actually have a upside with a room to grow. Overall I think the Steelers do a solid job at that. And if you look at their history, they don't often draft that Alabama player.
But you can't shy away from a prospect, just because of that. You just have to be confident in the evaluation process.
As a fan you can say pass sure, your opinion. As a team I damn sure glad they turn over the stones and evaluate on something other than a percentage of studs VS busts.More on a individual basis.
Just think that Georgia team you just pointed out produced one of the biggest busts on our team in quite some time. And you don't veer away from their players anymore than Alabama's.
Hell if you want to go by that Boise has one in the top 100 in comparison.
Nothing is consistent, if it was you wouldn't see so many get drafted from that school. Because they do face top competition, and have a decent amount of players in the NFL. Really enough to not overlook Alabama.