• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Shooter at the White House correspondents dinner

Troglodyte said:
Step out of your bubble, it’s keeping you clueless. In their redactions, the DOJ revealed names of victims, and concealed names of people who were not victims. Again, blissful ignorance with you.
Click to expand...

So now you're doing your Wonder Woman to deflect to the "accuracy" of the redactions. We weren't discussing that.

Next lily pad you'd like to hop to?
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
So now you're doing your Wonder Woman to deflect to the "accuracy" of the redactions. We weren't discussing that.

Next lily pad you'd like to hop to?
Click to expand...
What don’t you get about your contradiction of saying you want all the information released after having defended erroneous redactions?
 
Troglodyte said:
What don’t you get about your contradiction of saying you want all the information released after having defended erroneous redactions?
Click to expand...
the only information you want - and you've said it - is that about Trump.

you do not care about the victims, or the predators. Only Trump.

Trump 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨
 
Superman said:
the only information you want - and you've said it - is that about Trump.

you do not care about the victims, or the predators. Only Trump.

Trump 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨
Click to expand...
He certainly doesn't deny this statement,
 
Superman said:
the only information you want - and you've said it - is that about Trump.

you do not care about the victims, or the predators. Only Trump.

Trump 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨
Click to expand...
Yes. It's both remedial, and short sighted. Sad that this kind of "thinking" has prospered in our "advanced" society. Clear sign of a wide-spread unraveling of a once-great culture.
 
Superman said:
the only information you want - and you've said it - is that about Trump.

you do not care about the victims, or the predators. Only Trump.

Trump 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨
Click to expand...
I’m not the one on the side of the trio - Trump, Bondi and Blanche that have tried to silence the victims and bribe Maxwell.
 
Troglodyte said:
What don’t you get about your contradiction of saying you want all the information released after having defended erroneous redactions?
Click to expand...

You're this retarded. I didn't defend errors (if they were made). I educated you when you were pouting and whining about all of the redactions that they were agreed to by both sides of the aisle in order to get the information released. This escaped you at the time.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
You're this retarded. I didn't defend errors (if they were made). I educated you when you were pouting and whining about all of the redactions that they were agreed to by both sides of the aisle in order to get the information released. This escaped you at the time.
Click to expand...
Nope, you cluelessly and dutifully defended the erroneous redaction’s assuming they were in the interest of protecting the victims and not the perpetrators.
 
Troglodyte said:
Nope, you cluelessly and dutifully defended the erroneous redaction’s assuming they were in the interest of protecting the victims and not the perpetrators.
Click to expand...
in order for there to be redactions, then files must have been released.
per you, there are not any files released.
which is it, tard?
 
Superman said:
in order for there to be redactions, then files must have been released.
per you, there are not any files released.
which is it, tard?
Click to expand...
Any? WTF? About half have been released, heavily redacted, not in compliance with the EFTA, despite Blanches lies. Step out of your bubble.
 
Troglodyte said:
Any? WTF? About half have been released, heavily redacted, not in compliance with the EFTA, despite Blanches lies. Step out of your bubble.
Click to expand...
ah, so some files have been released. and you, all knowing and wise to all that is pdf files, know its only "about half".

btw - i never gave any number or volume of files released. you insisted until post 161 that no files have been released.

pfuck you and your bubble.
 
Superman said:
ah, so some files have been released. and you, all knowing and wise to all that is pdf files, know its only "about half".
Click to expand...
Step out of your bubble…

Superman said:
btw - i never gave any number or volume of files released. you insisted until post 161 that no files have been released.
Click to expand...
You’re not even coherent. So I state that Tim defended redacted files but also no files had been released?
 
Troglodyte said:
Nope, you cluelessly and dutifully defended the erroneous redaction’s assuming they were in the interest of protecting the victims and not the perpetrators.
Click to expand...

I didn't assume a thing. I provided you with links that explicitly showed the rules that both sides agreed to re: redactions. You were wholly ignorant of this at the time, and I'm sure through your tears or abject laziness refused to read the facts that were provided to you.
 
Troglodyte said:
Nope, you cluelessly and dutifully defended the erroneous redaction’s assuming they were in the interest of protecting the victims and not the perpetrators.
Click to expand...
He’s right. Time you put your conspiracy theory to rest.

Whats not in the news is that the DOJ apparently didn’t redact enough…and apparently have released more than they should have…and have faced scrutiny for it.

Following the release of millions of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in early 2026, victims and survivors have raised several major complaints regarding how the process was handled. [1, 2]

Exposure of Personal Information
Survivors expressed outrage over "botched" and haphazard redactions that accidentally revealed their identities and private data. [1, 2, 3]
  • Unredacted Details: Files were found to contain victims' full names, email addresses, phone numbers, and even private banking information.
  • Visual Material: The release included thousands of images and videos, some of which reportedly showed the faces of victims in nude or highly sensitive photos.
  • Privacy Violations: Some survivors have sued the government and Google, alleging that the DOJ violated the Privacy Act of 1974 by disclosing this information without consent. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Safety Risks and Death Threats
The failure to properly redact information has had immediate, dangerous consequences for survivors. [1]
  • Harassment: Nearly 100 survivors were exposed to harassment and renewed trauma.
  • Direct Threats: Multiple victims reported receiving death threats and described the situation as "life-threatening".
  • Physical Risk: One "Jane Doe" victim stated the release placed both her and her child at potential physical risk. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Emotional and Psychological Toll
Survivors have described the handling of the files as "egregious," "traumatizing," and a form of "revictimization". [1, 2, 3]
  • Broken Trust: Many felt let down by a process they hoped would bring justice but instead felt like "the exact opposite".
  • Continued Fear: Some survivors reported still living in terror of Epstein's circle, with the public release of their information only intensifying their anxiety. [1, 2]
In response to these complaints, the DOJ's internal watchdog (Office of the Inspector General) launched an investigation in April 2026 to evaluate the department's processes for redacting and releasing the records.

Epstein files latest: Victims complain of death threats as government ...
Feb 2, 2026 — The Brief * The Justice Department said it has taken down several thousand documents that may have included victim-identifying inf...

Victims complain of death threats as government says it's ...
Feb 2, 2026 — attorneys for some victims of Jeffrey Epstein. are asking federal judges to force the Justice Department to take down millions of ...

  • Epstein victims’ lawyers ask judges to force takedown of released ...
    Feb 2, 2026 — Sunday's letter also includes testimony from various anonymous “Jane Doe” victims who described receiving death threats and harass...
 
Last edited:
Tim Steelersfan said:
I didn't assume a thing. I provided you with links that explicitly showed the rules that both sides agreed to re: redactions. You were wholly ignorant of this at the time, and I'm sure through your tears or abject laziness refused to read the facts that were provided to you.
Click to expand...
Wait, both sides? What sides are those?
 
Troglodyte said:
Wait, both sides? What sides are those?
Click to expand...

You're retarded and super bad at this dance and deflect. Both sides dumbass - you crazy whack Liberals and Conservatives agreed on the rules about how to release the files.

The EFTA was a near unanimous bi-partisan bill. It passed the House 427 yeas to only 1 nay. It got unanimous vote in the Senate.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R.4405), signed into law on November 19, 2025, required the DOJ to release, in a searchable format, millions of documents, images, and videos related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell within 30 days. Rules prioritized transparency while allowing redactions to protect victim identities, withhold ongoing investigation details, and redact classified information

Rules agreed to by BOTH sides.

You don't understand the word OBEY, so I'll ask ahead of time, do you understand the definition of RULES?

Son, what's your next mental gymnastics move?

giphy.gif
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
You're retarded and super bad at this dance and deflect. Both sides dumbass - you crazy whack Liberals and Conservatives agreed on the rules about how to release the files.

The EFTA was a near unanimous bi-partisan bill. It passed the House 427 yeas to only 1 nay. It got unanimous vote in the Senate.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R.4405), signed into law on November 19, 2025, required the DOJ to release, in a searchable format, millions of documents, images, and videos related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell within 30 days. Rules prioritized transparency while allowing redactions to protect victim identities, withhold ongoing investigation details, and redact classified information

Rules agreed to by BOTH sides.

You don't understand the word OBEY, so I'll ask ahead of time, do you understand the definition of RULES?

Son, what's your next mental gymnastics move?

giphy.gif
Click to expand...
😂 Yes, BI-PARTISAN. They were on the same side. Trump, Bondi and Blanche were on the other side trying to block the release.
 
Troglodyte said:
😂 Yes, BI-PARTISAN. They were on the same side. Trump, Bondi and Blanche were on the other side trying to block the release.
Click to expand...

Thank you for your admission of defeat.

You said "both sides??"

Yes, your side and the right side UNANIMOUSLY voted for the release of the Epstein files under rules that included redactions that you now have your pink panties in a bunch about. And you can't point a finger.

Take the L.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
Thank you for your admission of defeat.

You said "both sides??"

Yes, your side and the right side UNANIMOUSLY voted for the release of the Epstein files under rules that included redactions that you now have your pink panties in a bunch about. And you can't point a finger.

Take the L.
Click to expand...
Tom Massie kindly asks WTF are you talking about?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top