29 tackles not 38, 2 sacks not 3, 1 ff not 2, he had 2 fumble recoveries
http://www.nfl.com/player/jarvisjones/2540137/profile
Last edited:
29 tackles not 38, 2 sacks not 3, 1 ff not 2, he had 2 fumble recoveries
http://www.nfl.com/player/jarvisjones/2540137/profile
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 803
- Reaction score
- 297
- Points
- 63
Did you include the playoffs?
irvins numbers don't include playoffs, so you want to include jones playoff numbers not irvins. facts are jarvis has and continues to be top 4 lowest producing olb in the sport. tomlin now has all of you trained that mediocrity is somehow ok.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 7,225
- Reaction score
- 7,591
- Points
- 113
I like Shazier for the fact that he seems to be smart enough to know that when he is the second guy there he can go for the ball and create turnovers. And it helps that he is fast too.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 35,999
- Reaction score
- 40,916
- Points
- 113
- Location
- between $2 short & ten buck two
Ryan Shazier deserves accolades, Jarvis Jones deserves a KICK in the ***. Bud Dupree shows way more promis the uncle jarvis. I say yes, play his 4th rookie contract year with option of the 5th. Cheap in cost and may get lucky as tom burdet may switch the light on for him....
Salute the nnation
Salute the nnation
The man is a game changer. I mean, how many lights did he leave on for how many people??
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2014
- Messages
- 1,278
- Reaction score
- 901
- Points
- 113
I don't think that he was standing up for Jarvis in any way. However, even with the correct stat totals, is Bruce Irvin really worth that much more of an investment? Or is it just a marginal improvement? Judging by his stats(I, admittedly, haven't watched much tape on him), Irvin looks more like Jason worilds.