- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,825
- Reaction score
- 17,209
- Points
- 113
No wonder they wanted a certain outsider out of DC....
Yeah a whole 20 billion for the border while we give 3 times that to those ******* in Ukraine.
Shouldn't border protection be included in the yearly budget? Just a bunch of kickbacks. Want to get unbelievably rich without going to jail? Become a senator or representative. Democrat that is. Or if anonymity is your game, be a part of the food chain that feeds the monkey.... Health care, Education, defense, high tech, entertainment, media,,,
We're facked
It'll never happen until it winds up on the big three networks, on front pages across the country and as the lead in on late night shows no matter how outdated they are.. Until then, it's just fake news...They rip us off so bad constantly with this ******* game. They do this **** over and over and over and over and over again.
Bunch of faw king extortionists. I'd love to see someone just out all of them.
If Schumer wants it you can be certain it isn't good for the American people, but the kickbacks are good for Chuck.
No need for a new bill. It's just more money being laundered. No vote for anyone who vote to pass this boondoggle.
I'm convinced that fentanyl money finds it's way into politicians pockets, there's no other reason as to why the flow of it continues across the southern border.If Schumer wants it you can be certain it isn't good for the American people, but the kickbacks are good for Chuck.
I agree. I was trying to be brief in the title. I messed it up, and apologize.The title on this thread is misleading. He did not say he would send US troops to the Ukraine if the bill wasn't passed. He said that if Ukraine lost the war, Russia would likely attack a NATO country which would lead to America being at war with Russia.
“If we don’t aid Ukraine, Putin will be walk all over Ukraine, we will lose the war and we could be fighting in eastern Europe and a NATO ally in a few years. Americans won’t like that,” Schumer said.
Note before anyone accuses me of being an apologist for Democrats etc, the fact I am pointing out the title of this thread does not match the content of the article, does not mean I am in favour of governments throwing taxpayers' money around like a drunken sailor on shore leave
Problem is the Dems have become the pro-war party but their true believers are the spawn of the anti-war hippies.
The title on this thread is misleading. He did not say he would send US troops to the Ukraine if the bill wasn't passed. He said that if Ukraine lost the war, Russia would likely attack a NATO country
which would lead to America being at war with Russia.
at this point, is it even OUR money anymore - or is it China's?Yep. Just a Trojan horse for giving Ukraine another 60 BILLION dollars. How much are we up to? Are they paying us back? **** no.
Here we are a country deep in debt and yet they still give away hundreds of billions of dollars of OUR money.
What complete and utter horseshit. Absolute garbage, a stupid lie told by lying liars elbow deep in graft and corruption. The warmongers care only about feeding their donors and getting their slimy hands on kickbacks.
Russia is not going to attack a NATO country, for **** sake. For more than 3 years Putin has said he will honor the pre-invasion borders in return for guarantees about the safety of Russian citizens in Ukrainian territory and that Ukraine will not be part of NATO.
******* Ukraine is a corrupt empty shell of a fake nation. Does anybody - a single person ever to walk the earth - believe the war would continue if the Unites States told Ukraine, "Okay, that's enough. Time for a peace treaty"?? The only people pushing the slaughter in Eastern Europe are the Americans.
What do you think the United States have been pushing to start for three years?!? Look, if New Mexico declared its independence from the United States, and the US waged war to return part of the territory to US domain, would we accept Russia attacking our economy and sending billions of dollars of heavy armament to New Mexicana??
The bullshit about Russia "attacking NATO if it wins the Ukraine war" is one of the biggest lies about war since the lies we were told by the Russians about Vietnam, and "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq.
Wait ...
when Russia invaded Ukraine, Russia was the most corrupt country in Europe. The second most corrupt? Ukraine.
**** Ukraine.
at this point, is it even OUR money anymore - or is it China's?
Their posture is that you and I are not getting taxed enough, that's why they "have to" borrow money from SS, foreign governments, etc.Well until they stop taking federal taxes out of our pay, it's still our money.
Depends if Russia was getting their porn and hookers from New Mexico.What do you think the United States have been pushing to start for three years?!? Look, if New Mexico declared its independence from the United States, and the US waged war to return part of the territory to US domain, would we accept Russia attacking our economy and sending billions of dollars of heavy armament to New Mexicana??
Depends if Russia was getting their porn and hookers from New Mexico.
Their posture is that you and I are not getting taxed enough, that's why they "have to" borrow money from SS, foreign governments, etc.