• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

San Bernandino, CA - Shootings

I think BO will tell us this is a religious problem. That the display of a Christmas tree is insulting to Muslims and they had the right to express there dislike.
 
Obama's gestapo changing headlines?


CVTJwm8WwAAzS0h.jpg
 
SCSteeler4life said:
Are you really that naive or just plain stupid ? What is relatively small when talking about mass murder of innocent people?
Click to expand...

Compared to 9/11 and Paris, this was relatively small. For having two people with assault rifles, hundreds of rounds of ammo, and several bombs, this was a small target. Wouldn't you think a larger, organized group would choose a bigger target?
 
Troglodyte said:
Compared to 9/11 and Paris, this was relatively small. For having two people with assault rifles, hundreds of rounds of ammo, and several bombs, this was a small target. Wouldn't you think a larger, organized group would choose a bigger target?
Click to expand...

If the bombs went off, **** load more folks are dead.
 
Troglodyte said:
Compared to 9/11 and Paris, this was relatively small. For having two people with assault rifles, hundreds of rounds of ammo, and several bombs, this was a small target. Wouldn't you think a larger, organized group would choose a bigger target?
Click to expand...

The bombs didn't go off which spared, I assume, quite a few people.

In addition, it is my belief that the attacks accomplish a much bigger goal than the individual attacks themselves. This is to increase the divide in our country causing even more weakness than we have already shown..
 
Troglodyte said:
Compared to 9/11 and Paris, this was relatively small. For having two people with assault rifles, hundreds of rounds of ammo, and several bombs, this was a small target. Wouldn't you think a larger, organized group would choose a bigger target?
Click to expand...

These people are inbred idiots I tend to not give them too much credit. The witnesses said the attack was during a break and the room wasn't as full when the shooter left. He also said there wasn't any disagreement. Maybe it was just dumb luck the room wasn't as packed.
 
ark steel said:
The bombs didn't go off which spared, I assume, quite a few people.

In addition, it is my belief that the attacks accomplish a much bigger goal than the individual attacks themselves. This is to increase the divide in our country causing even more weakness than we have already shown..
Click to expand...

good thing we have strong leadership in the oval office to lean on and give us security in times like these.
 
Spike said:
San Bernardino gunman Syed Rizwan Farook had become increasingly radicalized, CNN reports, and had been in touch by phone and via social media with more than one international terrorism subject under investigation by the FBI.

A search of their home turned up more pipe bombs and explosives attached to remote controlled cars
​http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/US-California-Shootings/2015/12/03/id/704356/
Click to expand...

That's it! I demand ATFE agents at every Radio Shack and Toys R Us doing background checks!
 
Superman said:
good thing we have strong leadership in the oval office to lean on and give us security in times like these.
Click to expand...

Yeah we had great security under Repugnican leadership all during the early 2000's. 2001 was a banner year in fact....
 
Guns are not the root cause of attacks like this one. My guns still haven't killed anybody. Yet. The root cause is Islam in this case and in others like the nutjob in Colorado it's mental illness. Address those two issues, not guns, not parts to make pipe bombs, not box knives, not remote controlled cars. Then the problem gets solved.
 
Elfiero said:
Yeah we had great security under Repugnican leadership all during the early 2000's. 2001 was a banner year in fact....
Click to expand...

I really don't think your dumbass wants to troll to that level.
 
Skott said:
So he was on the phone with people who were already on the FBI watch list. ...
The guy obviously planned this out...
His neighbors knew something was wrong but didn't say anything because they didn't want to be labeled racist...
Click to expand...
Don't Kalifornians follow marching orders? Don't the Feds tells us that "if you see something, say something"? Or does that only apply to suspicious whiteys?
 
Obama's Fault!!!


Unprecedented support for ISIS in the U.S

Washington (CNN) - Support for ISIS in America has reached an unprecedented level with several thousand U.S.-based sympathizers and more terrorism-related arrests in 2015 than any year since 9/11, according to a report by George Washington University's Program on Extremism.

The report noted that the average ISIS recruit is male and around 26 years old. It identified at least 300 Americans who actively support ISIS on social media and spread propaganda on the terror group's behalf, with Twitter being the preferred platform. In addition to those supporters, the FBI has previously said that they also have 900 open investigations into homegrown violent extremists, a majority being ISIS related.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/01/politics/isis-in-united-states-research/index.html

--------------------

102526395.jpg


Saudi Arabia accounted for 75% of the value of all official gifts given to the US in 2014

Analysis of the annual disclosure, released by the US Department of State’s Office of the Chief of Protocol, found Saudi Arabia gave the US gifts valued at around $2,566,525. It dominated the report and represented 75 percent of the value of all gifts received by Obama and his government employees last year.

The most lavish gift was an emerald and diamond jewellery set containing a ring, earrings, bracelet, and necklace, which was valued at $780,000. It was not given to Obama, his wife Michelle or his children, but Teresa Heinz Kerry, wife of US Secretary of State John Kerry. The jewels were given to Mrs Kerry in January 2014 by the late King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud.

First Lady Michelle Obama is included in the top five with two gifts of jewels from Saudi Arabia, each worth well over half a million dollars.

http://m.arabianbusiness.com/reveal...ficial-gifts-given-the-us-in-2014-614018.html

--------------------------

Wouldn't surprise me if Obama's corrupt regime is taking bribes from Muslim terrorists
 
Elfiero said:
Yeah we had great security under Repugnican leadership all during the early 2000's. 2001 was a banner year in fact....
Click to expand...

If your hero Clinton had killed terrorists, instead of chasing tail on his watch,....perhaps 9/11 would never have happened.
 
Steel Ballin said:
If your hero Clinton had killed terrorists, instead of chasing tail on his watch,....perhaps 9/11 would never have happened.
Click to expand...

Why is Clinton my hero, and why do you guys love assumption so much?
 
My first thought when I heard about this shooting was that we need more armed law abiding civilians, not less.
 
Elfiero said:
Yeah we had great security under Repugnican leadership all during the early 2000's. 2001 was a banner year in fact....
Click to expand...

I could be wrong but I think the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated with boxcutters, not guns and bombs.

So let's wage war on legal gun ownership.
 
21STEELERS21 said:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...child_labor_are_not_the_price_of_liberty.html

This guy has a point. Should the right to personal safety, outweigh the right to unlimited gun ownership?
Click to expand...

No, he doesn't have a point. One's rights do not end where another's rights begin. However, I will give him credit. At least he comes right out and pretty much says we need to ban guns. The rest of you liberals should come out of the closet too. You know it is what you want. Everyone else knows it is what you want. Just say it. You'll feel better.
 
21STEELERS21 said:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...child_labor_are_not_the_price_of_liberty.html

This guy has a point. Should the right to personal safety, outweigh the right to unlimited gun ownership?
Click to expand...

The whole article is based on the faulty premise that making it more difficult for law abiding citizens to get guns will keep them out of the hands of suicidal homicidal maniacs. Let's look at the facts: Columbine shooters could not legally purchase guns, they got them anyway through a friend. Adam Lanza would have passed any background check. Even if he couldn't due to his mental health history, his mother, who purchased the guns, could. These latest two it appears would have passed any background check. Short of banning guns entirely and collecting all guns currently in circulation, which is both impossible as well as not being proposed by anyone, there are no "tougher gun laws" that would prevent these incidents. And again, the Boston bombers killed people using crockpots and nails. Shall we ban them too? People who want to kill and don't mind dying doing it, certainly don't mind breaking whatever laws we come up with to do it.
 
It's a good thing we are bringing in all those muzzies into our state. Thanks wolf.
 
Elfiero said:
Yeah we had great security under Repugnican leadership all during the early 2000's. 2001 was a banner year in fact....
Click to expand...

Yes, thanks to 8 years of pacifist Democratic leadership, during which 9/11 was hatched and planned, Republicans were left to clean up the mess. Typically the case.
 
Seems to me there is a process for changing the Constitution if someone wanted to...it's called the amendment process. Wonder why the anti-gun crowd never starts a movement to do that. Could it be that they know most Americans don't want to give up this essential liberty? That's why they have to try to make end runs around it with all kinds of useless regulations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top