• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Religion Of Peace Update 3794778

Ron Burgundy

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Messages
28,989
Reaction score
29,929
Points
113
Location
Rochester, PA
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...onboard-high-speed-train-Amsterdam-Paris.html

Semper Fi, *******.

One of the hero Marines who foiled a planned terror attack on a French train was shot in the neck while disarming the crazed gunman on Friday.
The two unarmed servicemen spotted the 26-year-old Moroccan acting suspiciously and heard him trying to arm his weapon in the toilet of the high speed train between Amsterdam and Paris.
The gunman got on the train in Brussels and attempted his attack soon after crossing the French border.
The 26-year-old Moroccan national, who was known to security services, came out of the toilet brandishing the gun and opened fire. Fortunately, two US Marines were nearby and overpowered him before he could massacre passengers.
The suspected terrorist had at least nine full magazines of ammunition holding almost 300 rounds. He was also carrying a knife.
Unfortunately, one of the Marines was shot although his injuries are not thought to be life-threatening.
 
they should have taken his knife and buried it in the base of his skull.....
 
Those Marines were too aggressive. President Obammy would have talked to the guy, made him see the error of his ways, convinced him that Islam is a religion of peace, and the dude would now be feeding the homeless.
 
Yeah, but Christians are bad too. Those Marines were racists. Bush started this. .
 
Last edited:
I hope the passengers on the train express their gratitude to the men, and the US Marine Corps for their training.

It was Allah's will that they were in the right place at the right time!
 
President Obammy would have talked to the guy, made him see the error of his ways, convinced him that Islam is a religion of peace, and the dude would now be feeding the homeless.
Yeah, just like he did with Osama bin Laden and hundreds, if not thousands of al qaeda/isis operatives that have been taken out these past few years.

http://realdealtalk.com/how-many-terrorist-leaders-has-president-obama-killed/
With the killing of Muammar Qaddafi in Libya today, can the GOP continue to say that President Obama is soft on terrorism? I fear that they probably will, and never give this president any credit for anything. Nonetheless, here is a list of some of the terrorist leaders that have threatened America’s security who have been dispatched during President Obama’s first term of office.

1. Muammar Qaddafi in Libya today

2. Osama bin Laden, killed in May 2011.

3. Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) leader Anwar al-Awlaki.

4. Al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations, Abu Hafs al-Shahri, was killed in Waziristan, Pakistan.

5. In August, ‘Atiyah ‘Abd al-Rahman, the deputy leader of al Qaeda was killed.

6. In June, one of al Qaeda’s most dangerous commanders, Ilyas Kashmiri, was killed in Pakistan.

7. In Yemen that same month, three AQAP senior operatives Ammar al-Wa’ili, Abu Ali al-Harithi, and Ali Saleh Farhan were killed.

8. In Somalia, Al-Qa’ida in East Africa (AQEA) senior leader Harun Fazul was killed.

9. Administration officials also herald the recent U.S./Pakistani joint arrest of Younis al-Mauritani in Quetta.

10. Going back to August 2009, Tehrik e-Taliban Pakistan leader Baitullah Mahsud was killed in Pakistan.

11. In September 2009, Jemayah Islamiya operational planner Noordin Muhammad Top was killed in Indonesia

12. In September 2009 AQEA planner Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan was killed in Somalia.

13. In December 2009 in Pakistan, al Qaeda operational commanders Saleh al-Somali and ‘Abdallah Sa’id were killed.

14. In February 2010, in Pakistan, Taliban deputy and military commander Abdul Ghani Beradar was captured;

15. In February 2010, Haqqani network commander Muhammad Haqqani was killed

16. In February 2010, Lashkar-e Jhangvi leader Qari Zafar was killed.

17. In March 2010, al Qaeda operative Hussein al-Yemeni was killed in Pakistan

18. In March 2010, senior Jemayah Islamiya operative Dulmatin – accused of being the mastermind behind the 2002 Bali bombings – was killed during a raid in Indonesia.

19. In April 2010, al Qaeda in Iraq leaders Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi were killed.

20. In May, al Qaeda’s number three commander, Sheik Saeed al-Masri was killed.

21. In June 2010 in Pakistan, al Qaeda commander Hamza al-Jawfi was killed.

The GOP can continue to try to fool the American people about President Obama’s ability to advance America’s national security interests all they want. Nonetheless, the truth speaks louder than their lies.
 
Yeah, just like he did with Osama bin Laden and hundreds, if not thousands of al qaeda/isis operatives that have been taken out these past few years.

http://realdealtalk.com/how-many-terrorist-leaders-has-president-obama-killed/
With the killing of Muammar Qaddafi in Libya today, can the GOP continue to say that President Obama is soft on terrorism? I fear that they probably will, and never give this president any credit for anything. Nonetheless, here is a list of some of the terrorist leaders that have threatened America’s security who have been dispatched during President Obama’s first term of office.

1. Muammar Qaddafi in Libya today

2. Osama bin Laden, killed in May 2011.

3. Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) leader Anwar al-Awlaki.

4. Al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations, Abu Hafs al-Shahri, was killed in Waziristan, Pakistan.

5. In August, ‘Atiyah ‘Abd al-Rahman, the deputy leader of al Qaeda was killed.

6. In June, one of al Qaeda’s most dangerous commanders, Ilyas Kashmiri, was killed in Pakistan.

7. In Yemen that same month, three AQAP senior operatives Ammar al-Wa’ili, Abu Ali al-Harithi, and Ali Saleh Farhan were killed.

8. In Somalia, Al-Qa’ida in East Africa (AQEA) senior leader Harun Fazul was killed.

9. Administration officials also herald the recent U.S./Pakistani joint arrest of Younis al-Mauritani in Quetta.

10. Going back to August 2009, Tehrik e-Taliban Pakistan leader Baitullah Mahsud was killed in Pakistan.

11. In September 2009, Jemayah Islamiya operational planner Noordin Muhammad Top was killed in Indonesia

12. In September 2009 AQEA planner Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan was killed in Somalia.

13. In December 2009 in Pakistan, al Qaeda operational commanders Saleh al-Somali and ‘Abdallah Sa’id were killed.

14. In February 2010, in Pakistan, Taliban deputy and military commander Abdul Ghani Beradar was captured;

15. In February 2010, Haqqani network commander Muhammad Haqqani was killed

16. In February 2010, Lashkar-e Jhangvi leader Qari Zafar was killed.

17. In March 2010, al Qaeda operative Hussein al-Yemeni was killed in Pakistan

18. In March 2010, senior Jemayah Islamiya operative Dulmatin – accused of being the mastermind behind the 2002 Bali bombings – was killed during a raid in Indonesia.

19. In April 2010, al Qaeda in Iraq leaders Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi were killed.

20. In May, al Qaeda’s number three commander, Sheik Saeed al-Masri was killed.

21. In June 2010 in Pakistan, al Qaeda commander Hamza al-Jawfi was killed.

The GOP can continue to try to fool the American people about President Obama’s ability to advance America’s national security interests all they want. Nonetheless, the truth speaks louder than their lies.

Why does Bomma hate brown people?
 
Yeah, just like he did with Osama bin Laden and hundreds, if not thousands of al qaeda/isis operatives that have been taken out these past few years.....The GOP can continue to try to fool the American people about President Obama’s ability to advance America’s national security interests all they want. Nonetheless, the truth speaks louder than their lies.

What confuses us Islamophobes on the Right is that Bomma wants to kill some Muzzies and make life easy for other Muzzies (Iran). It's very confusing.
 
I hope the passengers on the train express their gratitude to the men, and the US Marine Corps for their training.

!

Hell...the French government should publically acknowledge these men.....their act of valor went well beyond what they did for the train passengers, and the brave Marines should be proclaimed national hero's in France, and honored appropriately..

Hell....I think the Frogs should build us another Statue of Liberty! :)
 
Get some Marines. Get some....,

Three Americans, including two U.S. servicemen, rushed a gunman who opened fire aboard a train traveling from Amsterdam to Paris on Friday afternoon, thwarting a potential massacre.

Alek Skarlatos said in an interview that his childhood friend, Spencer Stone, did not hesitate when he spotted the gunman holding what appeared to be a machine gun and tackled him.

"I saw a guy entering the train with an AK-47 and a handgun and I just looked over to Spencer and said, 'Let's go, go!'" said Skarlatos, a specialist with the Oregon National Guard.

advertisement

Stone, an airman first class in the Air Force, reached the attacker first and grabbed him by the neck, Skarlatos said.

"I grabbed the handgun. Got the handgun away from the guy and threw it, and then I grabbed the AK-47, which was at his feet," he added.

"If anybody would have gotten shot it would have been Spencer for sure," he said. "We're very lucky that nobody got killed, especially Spencer."

Another American, Skarlatos' and Stone's friend Anthony Sadler, and a British man living in France, Chris Norman, jumped in to help, they said.
 
Tibs ... Quadaffi was not a sponsor of terrorism since the 1980's, and since Reagan had his home bombed in retaliation for Pan Am 103. In fact, the Arab Spring - the event that basically made Bammy stain his drawers with excitement - has yielded Islamic extremists in power in Libya, Yemen and Egypt. The Islamic extremists in Egypt were overthrown by a coup (thankfully), or things would be much, much worse.

Yet again, Obama completely misread foreign affairs. He believed that the Islamic nations would put in power peace-loving, altruistic leaders who held no ill will towards the United States, to the point that he ordered our military to bomb Quadaffi's troops in Libya. He was wrong, as always,* and instead of the hipsters taking over in Yemen, and Libya, and Egypt, the Islamic nutjobs took power. Fellowship with America? No, instead he oversaw regimes promising, "Death to America!"

* Bammy was wrong about withdrawing all troops from Iraq, wrong about the threat posed by ISIS, wrong about the benefits of removing Al Assad from power in Syria, wrong about the benefits of removing Quadaffi in Libya, wrong about the supposed benefits in removing Mubarak in Egypt, wrong about the Arab Spring, wrong about Putin's intentions, and wrong about China's aggression towards Japan and Korea. What exactly has Bammy been right about in terms of foreign policy? Give me one freaking example, please.
 
Steeltime, I don't think Obama has handled a lot of things well when it comes to foreign policy. I do agree with his less is more approach and certainly prefer it to the warmongering neo-con approach we had previously. My post outlining all the terrorists he's taken out was just to off-set the argument he's weak or isn't willing to go after the enemy. Btw that's just an 'all star" list of the terrorist leaders from among 2,500 total operatives that have been hunted down and killed. He prefers tactical drone strikes as opposed to massive land wars. I happen to agree with him regardless of how much less money Haliburton and Brown & Root are able to siphon off. Of course there's bellyaching from conservatives, their answer to everything is war, war, war! We've lost enough men and women over the years fighting in the middle east. Don't think that's the answer. But I will reiterate, Obama has come up short on many aspects of foreign policy and certainly hasn't been able to move the needle forward in the middle east, joining a long line of presidents that came before him.
 
Last edited:
Steeltime, I don't think Obama has handled a lot of things well when it comes to foreign policy. I do agree with his less is more approach and certainly prefer it to the warmongering neo-con approach we had previously. My post outlining all the terrorists he's taken out was just to off-set the argument he's weak or isn't willing to go after the enemy. Btw that's just an 'all star" list of the terrorist leaders from among 2,500 total operatives that have been hunted down and killed. He prefers tactical drone strikes as opposed to massive land wars. I happen to agree with him regardless of how much less money Haliburton and Brown & Root are able to siphon off. Of course there's bellyaching from conservatives, their answer to everything is war, war, war! We've lost enough men and women over the years fighting in the middle east. Don't think that's the answer. But I will reiterate, Obama has come up short on many aspects of foreign policy and certainly hasn't been able to move the needle forward in the middle east, joining a long line of presidents that came before him.

While many people can agree the war in Iraq was a mistake, leaving Iraq to become the mess it has become is also a mistake of at least as great if not greater magnitude. The world is not black and white, "less is more" or "war mongering", "war, war, war" or "peace peace peace". Each individual foreign policy issue has to be dealt with individually.Some situations require strength and force, some require diplomacy. Iraq has become unstable and that has created a much more dangerous world for a whole lot of people. Whether we should have gone into Iraq or not we had a duty to the people there and to the men and women who died trying to stabilize that country, not to let it fall into the hands of bloodthirsty radical Islamists. We totally dropped the ball. Obama's little drone strikes are doing nothing but drawing more radical ire and recruiting more terrorists. Eventually our failure to nip this problem in the bud will spill over through our porous borders, maybe then Democrats will stop whining about Bush and Halliburton and start facing the real and growing threat of radical Islam.
 
Yeah, just like he did with Osama bin Laden and hundreds, if not thousands of al qaeda/isis operatives that have been taken out these past few years.

http://realdealtalk.com/how-many-terrorist-leaders-has-president-obama-killed/
With the killing of Muammar Qaddafi in Libya today, can the GOP continue to say that President Obama is soft on terrorism? I fear that they probably will, and never give this president any credit for anything. Nonetheless, here is a list of some of the terrorist leaders that have threatened America’s security who have been dispatched during President Obama’s first term of office.

1. Muammar Qaddafi in Libya today

2. Osama bin Laden, killed in May 2011.

3. Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) leader Anwar al-Awlaki.

4. Al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations, Abu Hafs al-Shahri, was killed in Waziristan, Pakistan.

5. In August, ‘Atiyah ‘Abd al-Rahman, the deputy leader of al Qaeda was killed.

6. In June, one of al Qaeda’s most dangerous commanders, Ilyas Kashmiri, was killed in Pakistan.

7. In Yemen that same month, three AQAP senior operatives Ammar al-Wa’ili, Abu Ali al-Harithi, and Ali Saleh Farhan were killed.

8. In Somalia, Al-Qa’ida in East Africa (AQEA) senior leader Harun Fazul was killed.

9. Administration officials also herald the recent U.S./Pakistani joint arrest of Younis al-Mauritani in Quetta.

10. Going back to August 2009, Tehrik e-Taliban Pakistan leader Baitullah Mahsud was killed in Pakistan.

11. In September 2009, Jemayah Islamiya operational planner Noordin Muhammad Top was killed in Indonesia

12. In September 2009 AQEA planner Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan was killed in Somalia.

13. In December 2009 in Pakistan, al Qaeda operational commanders Saleh al-Somali and ‘Abdallah Sa’id were killed.

14. In February 2010, in Pakistan, Taliban deputy and military commander Abdul Ghani Beradar was captured;

15. In February 2010, Haqqani network commander Muhammad Haqqani was killed

16. In February 2010, Lashkar-e Jhangvi leader Qari Zafar was killed.

17. In March 2010, al Qaeda operative Hussein al-Yemeni was killed in Pakistan

18. In March 2010, senior Jemayah Islamiya operative Dulmatin – accused of being the mastermind behind the 2002 Bali bombings – was killed during a raid in Indonesia.

19. In April 2010, al Qaeda in Iraq leaders Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi were killed.

20. In May, al Qaeda’s number three commander, Sheik Saeed al-Masri was killed.

21. In June 2010 in Pakistan, al Qaeda commander Hamza al-Jawfi was killed.

The GOP can continue to try to fool the American people about President Obama’s ability to advance America’s national security interests all they want. Nonetheless, the truth speaks louder than their lies.
So what's your excuse for releasing these type of folks from prison?
 
So what's your excuse for releasing these type of folks from prison?
I'm sorry, totally slipped up. Didn't realize which type of folks I was releasing from prison. Will try harder next time, my bad.
 
Last edited:
Steeltime, I don't think Obama has handled a lot of things well when it comes to foreign policy. I do agree with his less is more approach and certainly prefer it to the warmongering neo-con approach we had previously.

This has worked out so well in our battle against domestic terrorism.

After 9/11, there were no incidents of domestic terrorism in the US until Bammy took office. Since, there have been 17. Might be 18 now. Yes, less is definitely more.

His foreign policy "less is more" approach has led to more terrorists owning more land and greater spheres of influence around the globe.

The man is a genius.
 
After 9/11, there were no incidents of domestic terrorism in the US until Bammy took office. Since, there have been 17. Might be 18 now. Yes, less is definitely more.

Totally agree Tim, the government needs to do a much better job reeling in far-right extremists in the country. They're out of control and a menace to society.

http://securitydata.newamerica.net/extremists/deadly-attacks.html

Homegrown Extremists Tied to Deadlier Toll Than Jihadists in U.S. Since 9/11
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0

WASHINGTON — In the 14 years since Al Qaeda carried out attacks on New York and the Pentagon, extremists have regularly executed smaller lethal assaults in the United States, explaining their motives in online manifestoes or social media rants.

But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

The slaying of nine African-Americans in a Charleston church last week, with an avowed white supremacist charged with their murders, was a particularly savage case.

But it is only the latest in a string of lethal attacks by people espousing racial hatred, hostility to government and theories such as those of the “sovereign citizen” movement, which denies the legitimacy of most statutory law. The assaults have taken the lives of police officers, members of racial or religious minorities and random civilians.

Non-Muslim extremists have carried out 19 such attacks since Sept. 11, according to the latest count, compiled by David Sterman, a New America program associate, and overseen by Peter Bergen, a terrorism expert. By comparison, seven lethal attacks by Islamic militants have taken place in the same period.
 
Totally agree Tim, the government needs to do a much better job reeling in far-right extremists in the country. They're out of control and a menace to society.

http://securitydata.newamerica.net/extremists/deadly-attacks.html

Homegrown Extremists Tied to Deadlier Toll Than Jihadists in U.S. Since 9/11
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0

WASHINGTON — In the 14 years since Al Qaeda carried out attacks on New York and the Pentagon, extremists have regularly executed smaller lethal assaults in the United States, explaining their motives in online manifestoes or social media rants.

But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

The slaying of nine African-Americans in a Charleston church last week, with an avowed white supremacist charged with their murders, was a particularly savage case.

But it is only the latest in a string of lethal attacks by people espousing racial hatred, hostility to government and theories such as those of the “sovereign citizen” movement, which denies the legitimacy of most statutory law. The assaults have taken the lives of police officers, members of racial or religious minorities and random civilians.

Non-Muslim extremists have carried out 19 such attacks since Sept. 11, according to the latest count, compiled by David Sterman, a New America program associate, and overseen by Peter Bergen, a terrorism expert. By comparison, seven lethal attacks by Islamic militants have taken place in the same period.

First, my premise stands. This "less is more" approach has led to more terrorist attacks in the USA. Thanks for agreeing. Now you change the subject. Fine. We agree that Bammy's approach has led to a rise in domestic terrorism. So on to your "Right Wing Terrorists" information from such sites as "NewAmerica" and the always unbiased NY Times.

Where are the sections on Left Wing Terrorists? I'm struggling to find them. Can you point them out? You know, specifically, Black on White crime and other similar race-related hate crimes?

Your NewAmerica article does a WONDERFUL job of outlining such supposed right wing terrorist acts such as : "In 2011 David Pedersen and Holly Grigsby killed four people in a multi-state killing spree. The indictment alleged that the two along with others were members of a criminal enterprise whose purposes included “promoting and advancing a white supremacist movement to ‘purify’ and ‘preserve’ the white race and ‘reclaim our country’ and culture through acts of murder on the basis of race, color, religion, and perceived ‘degenerate’ conduct.” Pedersen pleaded guilty to a murder charge and Grigsby pleaded guilty to a racketeering charge encompassing all the crimes alleged."

The article purports that since 9/11 there have been 26 people killed in domestic terrorist incidents (their list is incomplete), and supposedly 48 people killed by "right wing" terrorists.

Since 9/11. how many whites have been killed by blacks in hate crimes?

You have to include those numbers. See, when incidents such as the Charleston shooting are included as "Right Wing" terrorist attacks, then that means conversely black on white hate crimes must be lumped into the "Left Wing Terrorist Attacks Category."

Let me know when you've tabulated those numbers please - black on white hate crime killings since 9/11.

Thanks.
 
Totally agree Tim, the government needs to do a much better job reeling in far-right extremists in the country. They're out of control and a menace to society.

http://securitydata.newamerica.net/extremists/deadly-attacks.html

Homegrown Extremists Tied to Deadlier Toll Than Jihadists in U.S. Since 9/11
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0

WASHINGTON — In the 14 years since Al Qaeda carried out attacks on New York and the Pentagon, extremists have regularly executed smaller lethal assaults in the United States, explaining their motives in online manifestoes or social media rants.

But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

The slaying of nine African-Americans in a Charleston church last week, with an avowed white supremacist charged with their murders, was a particularly savage case.

But it is only the latest in a string of lethal attacks by people espousing racial hatred, hostility to government and theories such as those of the “sovereign citizen” movement, which denies the legitimacy of most statutory law. The assaults have taken the lives of police officers, members of racial or religious minorities and random civilians.

Non-Muslim extremists have carried out 19 such attacks since Sept. 11, according to the latest count, compiled by David Sterman, a New America program associate, and overseen by Peter Bergen, a terrorism expert. By comparison, seven lethal attacks by Islamic militants have taken place in the same period.


2drx1d.gif
 
Libtards try to defend and justify Islamic terrorists because they share the same goal: destroy America. They love each other.
 
Libtards try to defend and justify Islamic terrorists because they share the same goal: destroy America. They love each other.

Only until the Muzzies are in charge. Then all the things Liberals love and stand for will be the first thing the Muzzies go after.
 
Libtards try to defend and justify Islamic terrorists because they share the same goal: destroy America. They love each other.

Reminds me of a quote from AC.

We've finally given liberals a war against fundamentalism, and they don't want to fight it. They would except that it would put them on the same side as the United States.
 
Top