• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Obama Treason

Djfan said:
I haven't verified any of this either. Just saw it posted.

Ken Blackwell​

7h ·
🚨
BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard has revoked the security clearances of Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger… and that’s just the beginning!!
She’s also pulled clearances from:
– John Brennan, the former CIA Director who weaponized intelligence and misled the American public about the Steele dossier.
– James Clapper, former DNI, who swore under oath there was no mass surveillance of Americans — then got caught lying.
– Susan Rice, who “unmasked” U.S. citizens for political reasons during the Obama years.
– Jake Sullivan, Biden’s National Security Advisor, who helped peddle the fake Alfa Bank narrative to smear Trump.
– Victoria Nuland, the architect of several regime-change disasters and foreign policy failures.
– Eric Swalwell, who sat on the House Intelligence Committee while having romantic ties to a Chinese spy.
– Peter Strzok, disgraced FBI agent who vowed to “stop” Trump from winning while investigating him under false pretenses.
– Lisa Page, another key player in the partisan takedown attempts of a sitting president.
– Fiona Hill, who testified during impeachment while maintaining deep ties to anti-Trump institutions abroad.
Tulsi Gabbard is doing what no one else would dare do... finally shutting the door on the corrupt old guard who treated American intelligence like a private political weapon.
These people abused their access. They leaked. They lied. They profited. And they used our national security institutions as tools of revenge and manipulation — not defense.
Revoking their clearances isn’t just symbolic. It’s the start of a full reckoning.
You don’t get to push lies about foreign collusion, spy on American citizens, help suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story, and then walk away with lifetime security access. That’s not how this republic works. At least, not anymore — thanks to Tulsi.
Let’s be blunt:
These clearances were never about safety. They were about status.
They used their “former official” labels to dominate cable news, build book deals, enrich themselves, and maintain backdoor access to power.
Well, those doors just got slammed shut.
Tulsi Gabbard is cleaning out the intelligence community like it’s never been cleaned before.
And that’s why she’s in danger.
Make no mistake: This move paints a massive target on her back. The people she just stripped of power aren’t just bitter — they’re dangerous. They’re part of a machine that doesn’t go quietly. These are the same forces who orchestrated the Russia hoax, buried the truth about the Wuhan lab, silenced dissent on COVID policies, and tried to break any leader who wouldn’t bow to their narrative.
Pray for Tulsi Gabbard.
She is standing alone in a storm of powerful enemies.
The same elite circles that protected Epstein, buried Hunter’s laptop, and lied under oath are now coming for her. They know Tulsi can’t be bought, can’t be blackmailed, and won’t back down.
She’s not playing politics. She’s fighting for the soul of this country.
And when someone does that — the deep state takes notice. And they retaliate.
Click to expand...
I don't see why anyone who no longer works for the Federal government needs a security clearance regardless of which party they're in.
 
Ron Burgundy said:
I don't see why anyone who no longer works for the Federal government needs a security clearance regardless of which party they're in.
Click to expand...
It allows those that leave public service to get nice cushy jobs from private companies that need employees to have clearances. The first thing I was asked when I applied to work at AW Sperry, waaaaaaaaay back in the 80’s, was if I had a clearance and what level.
 
MT~Forged said:
It allows those that leave public service to get nice cushy jobs from private companies that need employees to have clearances. The first thing I was asked when I applied to work at AW Sperry, waaaaaaaaay back in the 80’s, was if I had a clearance and what level.
Click to expand...
Exactly why they shouldn't do it.
 
More damning releases. This from ODN

DNI Clapper to NSA Director Rogers: “That’s OUR story, and we’re stickin’ to it”​


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ODNI News Release No. 22-25
August 13, 202

DNI Clapper to NSA Director Rogers:​


Stunning admission that manufacturing intelligence is a “team sport” requiring “compromise on our ‘normal modalities’”


WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard declassified a Top Secret email from then-DNI James Clapper exposing his efforts to suppress concerns raised by then-National Security Agency (NSA) Director Mike Rogers regarding the politicized January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that President Obama ordered

On December 22, 2016, Rogers wrote an email to Clapper, then-FBI Director James Comey, and then CIA Director John Brennan expressing serious concerns over the NSA’s lack of “sufficient access,” warning that NSA personnel “aren’t fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments.” Clapper responded, “We may have to compromise on our ‘normal’ modalities” and “more time is not negotiable.”

“The leading figures in the Russia Hoax have spent years deceiving the American public by presenting their manufactured and politicized assessments as credible intelligence. The email released today reinforces what we already exposed: the decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top,” said DNI Gabbard. “Clapper’s own words confirm that complying with the order to manufacture intelligence was a ‘team sport.’

Clapper’s response to Rogers came just hours before the authors of the ICA were set to deliver the initial draft of the politicized ICA to Intelligence Community leaders.

You can view the declassified emails here.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
More damning releases. This from ODN

DNI Clapper to NSA Director Rogers: “That’s OUR story, and we’re stickin’ to it”​


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ODNI News Release No. 22-25
August 13, 202

DNI Clapper to NSA Director Rogers:​


Stunning admission that manufacturing intelligence is a “team sport” requiring “compromise on our ‘normal modalities’”


WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard declassified a Top Secret email from then-DNI James Clapper exposing his efforts to suppress concerns raised by then-National Security Agency (NSA) Director Mike Rogers regarding the politicized January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that President Obama ordered

On December 22, 2016, Rogers wrote an email to Clapper, then-FBI Director James Comey, and then CIA Director John Brennan expressing serious concerns over the NSA’s lack of “sufficient access,” warning that NSA personnel “aren’t fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments.” Clapper responded, “We may have to compromise on our ‘normal’ modalities” and “more time is not negotiable.”

“The leading figures in the Russia Hoax have spent years deceiving the American public by presenting their manufactured and politicized assessments as credible intelligence. The email released today reinforces what we already exposed: the decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top,” said DNI Gabbard. “Clapper’s own words confirm that complying with the order to manufacture intelligence was a ‘team sport.’

Clapper’s response to Rogers came just hours before the authors of the ICA were set to deliver the initial draft of the politicized ICA to Intelligence Community leaders.

You can view the declassified emails here.
Click to expand...
maybe @DBS1970 can tard this down for Flog to understand.

doubtful, but every day is a new day.
 
 
The corruption being exposed everywhere.

‘Shut it down’: Bombshell FBI timeline exposes political interference in Clinton corruption probe ​


Kid gloves vs. brass knuckles: Newly-declassified timeline shows how the investigation of the Clinton Foundation was hamstrung by FBI and DOJ while baseless Russia collusion marched foward in both agencies against Donald Trump.

FBI Director Kash Patel has uncovered a bombshell memo written in 2017 chronicling the extensive political obstruction that career agents in three cities faced from their own bosses and the Obama Justice Department during the 2016 election as they probed whether Hillary Clinton engaged in a pay-to-play corruption scheme involving her family foundation.

"Shut it down!" then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates is quoted as demanding in the detailed timeline of political impediments that agents in New York City, Little Rock, Ark., and Washington D.C. reported.

The agents tried to get the help of federal prosecutors to determine whether or what crimes occurred while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State, most notably, because at that time, her family foundation solicited hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign and U.S. interests with business before her department.

The timeline — written by a DOJ lawyer assigned to the FBI under former bureau Director James Comey — was recently secured by top aides to Patel along with several corroborating internal emails and was obtained by Just the News. Together, they make clear that both the DOJ and former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe placed significant impediments in front of agents who believed they had evidence to justify a public integrity criminal case

The declassified timeline revealed that as early as February 2016, the Justice Department “indicated they would not be supportive of an FBI investigation.” The timeline also shows that, in mid-February 2016, McCabe ordered that “no overt investigative steps” were allowed to be taken in the Clinton Foundation investigation “without his approval” — a command he allegedly repeated numerous times over the coming months.

You can read the timeline here:

Declassified Timeline on Clinton Foundation Investigation

More inside the link....
 

Meet the Leakers! Russiagate Was More Incestuous Than You Could Believe​

Many years ago, Bill Whittle gave me the sharpest definition you might ever read for the proper role of journalism in a healthy republic: "They're the antibodies of the body politic." But we do not live in a healthy republic — and journalists too often are part of the cancer we're trying to eliminate.

Case in point: So-called journalists who, instead of investigating Russiagate claims, performed as marionettes for the Obama-era intelligence community, determined to rig and then undo a presidential election.

And now we have at least two names.

I'll get to those in just a moment, but first, this important reminder.

At the center of the Obama White House’s fabricated Russia collusion narrative is Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) — currently under investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maryland for mortgage fraud.

The first name is Ellen Nakashima, whom RealClearInvestigations senior reporter Paul Sperry dryly calls "the Washington Post's handmaiden for the deep state." Her most recent appearance, Sperry reported on Tuesday, isn't under her WaPo byline, but in "FBI 302s as the likely key recipient of classified intelligence leaks from Adam Schiff regarding Russiagate."

Sperry previously reported in July that "Declassified docs show Obama's spooks used Washington Post stenographer Ellen Nakashima to plant 3 major Russiagate stories," so the idea that Nakashima was also on Schiff's speed dial is hardly outrageous.

“It has come to my attention that Washington Post reporter @nakashimae appears to be actively harassing ODNI staff,” administration intel chief Tulsi Gabbard posted on X last month. "Instead of reaching out to my press office, she is calling high-level Intelligence Officers from a burner phone, refusing to identify herself, lying about the fact that she works for the Washington Post, and then demanding they share sensitive information."

Nakashima also helped bury the Hunter Biden Laptop from Hell story.

Another name is New York Times investigative reporter Michael Schmidt.

John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy reported late on Tuesday that "Columbia University law professor Daniel Richman admitted to [FBI] agents in interviews he routinely communicated on behalf of [then-FBI director James] Comey, his longtime friend, with Times reporter Michael Schmidt, whose work was among the newspaper's 2018 Pulitzer-winning stories on Russian election interference."

Pulitzer-winning fake news — good grief.

"Schmidt unflinchingly reported every angle of the bogus Mueller investigation into nonexistent criminal 'collusion,'" "Declassified" host Julie Kelly posted last week. "Now he’s carrying water for Russiagate perps while expressing shock the tables are now turned."

That was in response to a July 23 NYT hit piece where Schmidt accused Trump of abusing Russiagate in pursuit of "prosecution of his most prominent rivals."

You can bet more names are coming, and you can read the redacted FBI 302 interview reports here, courtesy of JustTheNews.

Kyle Becker noted at zero-dark-thirty this morning that the big three national newspapers — NYT, WaPo, WSJ — are all implicated by the FBI 302s. "All had reporters who appear to have participated in recycling the Democratic Party's talking points based on faulty and misleading intel dumps."
 
Tim Steelersfan said:

Meet the Leakers! Russiagate Was More Incestuous Than You Could Believe​

Many years ago, Bill Whittle gave me the sharpest definition you might ever read for the proper role of journalism in a healthy republic: "They're the antibodies of the body politic." But we do not live in a healthy republic — and journalists too often are part of the cancer we're trying to eliminate.

Case in point: So-called journalists who, instead of investigating Russiagate claims, performed as marionettes for the Obama-era intelligence community, determined to rig and then undo a presidential election.

And now we have at least two names.

I'll get to those in just a moment, but first, this important reminder.

At the center of the Obama White House’s fabricated Russia collusion narrative is Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) — currently under investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maryland for mortgage fraud.

The first name is Ellen Nakashima, whom RealClearInvestigations senior reporter Paul Sperry dryly calls "the Washington Post's handmaiden for the deep state." Her most recent appearance, Sperry reported on Tuesday, isn't under her WaPo byline, but in "FBI 302s as the likely key recipient of classified intelligence leaks from Adam Schiff regarding Russiagate."

Sperry previously reported in July that "Declassified docs show Obama's spooks used Washington Post stenographer Ellen Nakashima to plant 3 major Russiagate stories," so the idea that Nakashima was also on Schiff's speed dial is hardly outrageous.

“It has come to my attention that Washington Post reporter @nakashimae appears to be actively harassing ODNI staff,” administration intel chief Tulsi Gabbard posted on X last month. "Instead of reaching out to my press office, she is calling high-level Intelligence Officers from a burner phone, refusing to identify herself, lying about the fact that she works for the Washington Post, and then demanding they share sensitive information."

Nakashima also helped bury the Hunter Biden Laptop from Hell story.

Another name is New York Times investigative reporter Michael Schmidt.

John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy reported late on Tuesday that "Columbia University law professor Daniel Richman admitted to [FBI] agents in interviews he routinely communicated on behalf of [then-FBI director James] Comey, his longtime friend, with Times reporter Michael Schmidt, whose work was among the newspaper's 2018 Pulitzer-winning stories on Russian election interference."

Pulitzer-winning fake news — good grief.

"Schmidt unflinchingly reported every angle of the bogus Mueller investigation into nonexistent criminal 'collusion,'" "Declassified" host Julie Kelly posted last week. "Now he’s carrying water for Russiagate perps while expressing shock the tables are now turned."

That was in response to a July 23 NYT hit piece where Schmidt accused Trump of abusing Russiagate in pursuit of "prosecution of his most prominent rivals."

You can bet more names are coming, and you can read the redacted FBI 302 interview reports here, courtesy of JustTheNews.

Kyle Becker noted at zero-dark-thirty this morning that the big three national newspapers — NYT, WaPo, WSJ — are all implicated by the FBI 302s. "All had reporters who appear to have participated in recycling the Democratic Party's talking points based on faulty and misleading intel dumps."
Click to expand...
paging @Tibs
 
Ahh the price of treason now is that you receive compensation so high that you can buy multiple multimillion dollar mansions and still has the balls to lecture the American people about "democracy "

ahhh hope&change.

 
They need to investigate the investigator.
Why has Special Counsel John Durhams name not surfaced?

Durham had spent 3 1/2 years investigating the Russian hoax.
The way I understood his conclusion it is that although the suspects involved went further than they should have, what they did was nothing illegal.

Durham interviewed Brennan for eight hours on August 21, 2020, after which a Brennan advisor said Durham told Brennan he was not a subject or target of a criminal investigation, but rather a witness to events.
 
Hypocycloids said:
They need to investigate the investigator.
Why has Special Counsel John Durhams name not surfaced?

Durham had spent 3 1/2 years investigating the Russian hoax.
The way I understood his conclusion it is that although the suspects involved went further than they should have, what they did was nothing illegal.

Durham interviewed Brennan for eight hours on August 21, 2020, after which a Brennan advisor said Durham told Brennan he was not a subject or target of a criminal investigation, but rather a witness to events.
Click to expand...
The swamp is turning out to be more like the abyss we always thought it was
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top