• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

NFL institutes 15-yard penalty, possible ejection for lowering head to make hit

antdrewjosh

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2014
Messages
9,543
Reaction score
3,401
Points
113
Location
Newark,NJ
ORLANDO, Fla. -- NFL owners passed an unexpected rule Tuesday that will expand penalties for contact involving helmets, one that is more significant and far-reaching than the NCAA's targeting rule.

Under the change, a player will be penalized 15 yards and potentially ejected any time he lowers his head to initiate and make contact with his helmet against an opponent. It will apply to tacklers, ball carriers and even linemen, and it will take the place of a previous rule that limited the penalty to contact with the crown of the helmet.

EDITOR'S PICKS

NFL owners approve new catch, ejection rules
Owners on Tuesday unanimously approved a new catch rule and authorized senior vice president of officiating Al Riveron to eject players from games for egregious non-football acts.

The NCAA's targeting rule penalizes players only when they hit opponents who are in a defenseless position. It calls for mandatory ejections, but the NFL's competition committee has not yet addressed how ejections would be adjudicated, according to chairman Rich McKay. There is little doubt, however, that the NFL is determined to aggressively address a 2017 season that included 291 concussions, its highest total on record, and a severe spine injury to Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Ryan Shazier on a play that would fall under the new rule.

"It just seems that players at every level are getting more comfortable playing with their helmets as a weapon rather than a protective device," McKay said. "Therefore, we need a rule that is broad and puts that in context, and that's what we think this does."

Players, coaches and fans were left guessing on how the rule will impact the game. NFL Players Association president Eric Winston took to Twitter to share his thoughts.


According to NFL research, nearly one out of every two helmet-to-helmet hits caused a concussion in 2017. That's up from a ratio of one out of every three in 2015. NFL chief medical officer Allen Sills said in February that the current concussion data had sparked a "call to action," and on Tuesday he said this rule would be a key part of reducing head injuries in 2018.

"We spoke previously this year of having an all-time high of concussions," Sills said. "And we said that wasn't acceptable, and that we would respond to this, and this was part of the response. This is a very key component of the injury-reduction strategy on how we can reduce concussions immediately."


The hit on which Steelers linebacker Ryan Shazier, bottom, suffered a severe spinal injury would fall under the new rule passed Tuesday. Ian Johnson/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
The competition committee initially planned to make lowering the helmet a 2018 point of emphasis rather than a rule change, McKay said. But after a leaguewide discussion Tuesday, owners instructed McKay to convert it to language that could be added to the rule book immediately. The league called a late-afternoon news conference and acknowledged that some parts of the rule still must be fleshed out.


At the top of the list is how to merge a long-standing league ethos against two issues: wide-ranging ejections of players; and using replay to review what are considered subjective calls by officials. McKay said the league is trying to effect a change in "behavior" and thus likely needs the weight of an ejection to communicate its sincerity. And given the potential impact on a game, a replay review is almost certain to be necessary to ensure proper enforcement.

ADVERTISEMENT

"If you put replay behind [officials]," McKay said, "then I think that you do have the opportunity to feel more comfortable in ejecting them. But in this rule, we just need to do a little work to understand a little bit more how the mechanisms will work. But I think we do feel comfortable that if there is an ejection that replay would probably play a part of it."

The NFL will spend the next two months further developing the rule and likely will alter it to address replay and ejections at its May 21-23 meetings in Atlanta.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...es-rule-lowering-head-initiate-contact-helmet
 
I mentioned this in another thread....so does this mean the QB sneak is illegal? I guess they would hate to eject the QB for doing it since he has to lower his head to perform it correctly.


Sent from my iPad using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
yeah, this will be an abortion.

First its somewhat of an indictment on Shazier. Second, its going to be a subjective call. 3rd. Making a tackle, you almost cant make a tackle without your head going in first,,

Hell lets just make it FOOT ball. You have to trip the receiver or running back.
 
I mentioned this in another thread....so does this mean the QB sneak is illegal? I guess they would hate to eject the QB for doing it since he has to lower his head to perform it correctly.


Sent from my iPad using Steeler Nation mobile app

I'm pretty sure lowering your head inside the tackles is allowed for any player with the ball.
 
Riddel showcases new helmet for 2018

il_340x270.1190814181_hb90.jpg
 
There goes all goalline RB plays up the middle and short yardage plays. They are always lowering their head for that hard yard. This will be the worst rule ever enacted in football. You thought it was unwatchable before? Now late in a game to get a first down or TD, a RB lowers their head, and barely gets the first, it will now be a 15yd penalty the other way. That is not ******* football, and it will kill even more fans of the game if it is called that way.
 
You can only make the game so safe, there's always going to be injuries. So now there's more judgement calls put in

Sent from my XT1585 using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
I played tackle football for many years in high school and college. It's a natural instinct to lower your helmet as you tackle someone. So your telling me on a goal line play the RB is suppose to dance through the line of scrimmage with his head upright? What about short yardage situations? QB Sneaks? This might be one of the dumbest rule changes in the history of the game. So your going to let the refs once again make a judgement decision in a critical situation.

Absolutely ridiculous!
 
One step forward, 2 steps bac...nfl is ******.
 
Last edited:
If the scope of this isn't limited somehow, this will mark the end for the nfl. No one is going to tune in to watch track stars dance around one another for 60 mins, period. Get it right you ******* morons, you're killing the sport with your stupidity.

Joe
 
Nope, you missed Coach interpreting the headline in his own way, instead of reading the rule change.


Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app

When did the NFL start throwing flags from a ball carrier running between the tackles? A new rule as of March 2018?
 
Last edited:
I played tackle football for many years in high school and college. It's a natural instinct to lower your helmet as you tackle someone. So your telling me on a goal line play the RB is suppose to dance through the line of scrimmage with his head upright? What about short yardage situations? QB Sneaks? This might be one of the dumbest rule changes in the history of the game. So your going to let the refs once again make a judgement decision in a critical situation.

Absolutely ridiculous!



Fortunately we have a RB that can dance............!!!!!!!!



Salute the nation
 
When did the NFL start throwing flags from a ball carrier running between the tackles? A new rule as of March 2018?

They haven't. The description of the new rule indicates that it will apply to RB's and did not include any exceptions. My guess would be that the final version WILL include some exceptions, but, as described, it does not, which would be a major change.
 
They haven't. The description of the new rule indicates that it will apply to RB's and did not include any exceptions. My guess would be that the final version WILL include some exceptions, but, as described, it does not, which would be a major change.



UNTIL the final wording comes out it's all a guess. I bet there is language of a 11/2 to 3 yard cushion each side of the ball.




Salute the nation
 
Top