• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Legarrette Blount... We sure showed him who's boss...

LeXX75

Moderator
Moderator
Contributor
Joined
Apr 11, 2014
Messages
1,454
Reaction score
1,337
Points
113
Location
Jerz
I wonder why the Cheatriots could get the guy to act right but we couldn't though?

Has he or has he not been the Cheats lead back since they picked him up? Bury him behind someone and he would have done the same ****.
I dont doubt Bellycheat was behind his whole act.......text to Blount from Bellycheat...

hey Blount get them to release you ..we will sign you and make you our lead back..come home...

Blount: um I dunno coach I really like hangin with this Bell dude.

Bellycheat: come on man..we got a better shot at the Super Bowl but we need you back...don't worry llI get you some good stuff..you just gotta bide your time

Blount: Alright ...alright ...but how coach?

Bellycheat: hmm..wait I know walk out on the team before a game is over..I know this team...they will cut you lose for sure

Blount: you got it coach ...
 

steelermania

Well-known member
Member
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
640
Points
113
I wonder why the Cheatriots could get the guy to act right but we couldn't though?

He's happy because he's playing. A lot of clubhouse cancers cause no problems when they're playing, and the team is winning. It's when they're not playing, or the team is losing, when they become a headache.
 

Drink IRON City

KAYAK Champion who drives a LUXURY S10
Forefather
Contributor
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
30,497
Reaction score
30,792
Points
113
Location
between $2 short & ten buck two
Blunt cut, end of story. The douche bag was creating cancer, why would you keep him? As said, why did we wait to sign replacement?




Salute the nation
 

Omar10213245

πŸ‘€πŸ‘‚πŸŽƒπŸˆπŸ‡πŸ₯‘πŸ†πŸ‹πŸͺ‚πŸŒžπŸŒ›πŸŒœβ˜‚β˜”β„πŸŒŠπŸ₯΄πŸ€¬πŸ₯Ί
Member
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
10,393
Reaction score
8,514
Points
113
Has he or has he not been the Cheats lead back since they picked him up? Bury him behind someone and he would have done the same ****.
I dont doubt Bellycheat was behind his whole act.......text to Blount from Bellycheat...

hey Blount get them to release you ..we will sign you and make you our lead back..come home...

Blount: um I dunno coach I really like hangin with this Bell dude.

Bellycheat: come on man..we got a better shot at the Super Bowl but we need you back...don't worry llI get you some good stuff..you just gotta bide your time

Blount: Alright ...alright ...but how coach?

Bellycheat: hmm..wait I know walk out on the team before a game is over..I know this team...they will cut you lose for sure

Blount: you got it coach ...

Lol wow. Some of you posters are pretty damn creative
 

Superman

You may worship me
Moderator
Forefather
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
20,432
Reaction score
23,299
Points
113
Location
Trampa, FL
Blunt cut, end of story. The douche bag was creating cancer, why would you keep him? As said, why did we wait to sign replacement?




Salute the nation

we tried to claim Ben Tate when he was released, but the Vikings beat us to him.
after that, there were no viable candidates.
 

oneforthebus

Well-known member
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
7,943
Reaction score
7,478
Points
113
I wonder why the Cheatriots could get the guy to act right but we couldn't though?

He's only been there for 2 months. He has a long record of being a stupid impulsive *******, give it time.
 

mightyguru

On a cloud...
Forefather
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
6,291
Reaction score
5,939
Points
113
Douche probably already had a deal in place with Hoodie and the Blowjobs.
 

hamster

Pronouns: Your lordship
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
9,647
Reaction score
7,279
Points
113
Location
Picksburgh, PA
**** Blunt. Glad he's gone. One can make an argument that he wasn't used properly. But no one in the room stood up for him. Speaks volumes.
 

madinsomniac

Well-known member
Member
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
19,325
Reaction score
20,111
Points
113
Location
LP in the burgh
Lol wow. Some of you posters are pretty damn creative

NE is as dirty as they come. When everyone outside of their fanbase distrusts them, and they continue to prove that they are dishonorable scumbags, believing the worse about them is 100% acceptable...
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2014
Messages
77
Reaction score
55
Points
18
I wonder why the Cheatriots could get the guy to act right but we couldn't though?

Because the cheatriots don't have a number 1 that is younger and clearly better than him. In Pittsburgh he had no chance of being a number 1 barring injury.

I don't like what he did. He quit on his team. But that doesn't mean you have stomp his dick into the dirt to get even. Cut him and move on. He clearly has.
 

FAB802

Well-known member
Contributor
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
1,876
Reaction score
929
Points
113
I don't do hindsight, it hurts my eyes. Every person that's bellyaching about them cutting him now, would have been the same ones bitching that Tomlin and our FO were soft on player discipline had they kept him around and the same story got out. You can't have it both ways. They did what they had to do. Him having one birthday game against an *** defense won't change that. By the way, he will see a real defense in two weeks. Back to persona non grata for him, just like his 3 carries for 1 yard against the Rats the game before. You know, the team he would have lifted us to victory against......
 

steelhurt

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2014
Messages
5,847
Reaction score
6,972
Points
113
Hell yes we should have cut him. He quit on the team and for that he should be let go. Now my question is this; why was a guy with such low character issues ever signed in the firs place? Surely we could have signed someone with experience that would know his role and not quit.
 

slashsteel

Thank you for everything Franco, R I P.
Contributor
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
36,888
Reaction score
41,994
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh
Hell yes we should have cut him. He quit on the team and for that he should be let go. Now my question is this; why was a guy with such low character issues ever signed in the firs place? Surely we could have signed someone with experience that would know his role and not quit.

bad decision making, which was in abundance
 

Omar10213245

πŸ‘€πŸ‘‚πŸŽƒπŸˆπŸ‡πŸ₯‘πŸ†πŸ‹πŸͺ‚πŸŒžπŸŒ›πŸŒœβ˜‚β˜”β„πŸŒŠπŸ₯΄πŸ€¬πŸ₯Ί
Member
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
10,393
Reaction score
8,514
Points
113
NE is as dirty as they come. When everyone outside of their fanbase distrusts them, and they continue to prove that they are dishonorable scumbags, believing the worse about them is 100% acceptable...

I'm thinkin some people in here watch a lil too much tv, is all I'm sayin
 

Ron Burgundy

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Messages
27,021
Reaction score
25,435
Points
113
Location
Rochester, PA
I was hoping that ex-Browns karma would follow Ben Tate and we'd win the SB with him.
 

antdrewjosh

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2014
Messages
9,543
Reaction score
3,401
Points
113
Location
Newark,NJ
Bell was hurt lined up at WR catching a 15 yd in. Was Blount going to do that?? No so how does Bell injury have anything to do with Blount? It happened it was unfortunate but **** Blount he quit on us. Who knows how the season turns out if we keep him. Could of destroyed our chemistry.
 

DocScott

Active member
Contributor
Joined
Apr 14, 2014
Messages
293
Reaction score
98
Points
28
Blount never wanted to be a back up for us or for any team in the league. He walked out, we kept winning and our RB has proven his worth. Next!
 

miiike

Active member
Contributor
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
155
Reaction score
156
Points
43
Blount can run for 400 yards and 8 tds in the Super bowl or he could have the key fumble that loses the SB for the New England "Soft Balls" Patriots. Either way, it was still the correct call to get his *** off the Steelers.
 

Steel G

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2014
Messages
1,861
Reaction score
1,070
Points
113
Colts had no shot in that game no matter who was running the ball for the Pats*. They could've gone into that game with the combo of Chris Rainey and Dri Archer in the back field and the Pats* were still "winning" that game. As for Blount, his and the Steelers' bigger problem was that he was a **** influence on Bell and the Steelers weren't going to stand around and watch it happen.
 
Top