• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Jason Whitlock blasts Tomlin

His comments about Munchack and Porter being out of control are just ridiculous. Especially Munchack who only grabbed hair cause it's so damn long.
 
Ive called him out before on this nonsense... If you want to write about a game, watch the whole ******* game you ********, not just cropped highlights. That's the problem with guys like that... its like me trying to comment on NBA, NHL, NFL, MLB, College Hoops, NCAA Football, MLS, and Some minor league team... There wouldn't be enough time to get a feel for everything going on in a given day to make educated opinions on them all. Pick one or two, focus on it, review it, then write or go on the radio... Whitlock is another shock journalist with opinions but no substance. Oh he says controversial stuff all the time... great but 90% of it is him talking out of his *** from public opinion and a condensed highlight reel.
 
I bet he'd like Tomlin better if Mike gave him another twinkie!
 
It must suck to resort to race pimping to remain relevant. Coach Tomlin despite his faults, many pointed out here ad nauseum including moi, is still a classy guy.
Who wouldn't want to listen to Mike Tomlin's frank response to Whitlock's gratuitous and obtuse assertion?
I know I would!
 
Does that mean Marvin Lewis gets a pass too?
 
Because black coaches are always treated so well by the media and by their organizations. God I hate Jason Whitlock
 
wow. I always thought Vader was white.
 
These cockheads like Whitlock says Peezy should get fined may want to offer up that there were UMPTEEN Bungle coaches on the field as well ! So if you fine Joey,you have to fine all assistant coaches...on BOTH teams.And as far as the Munch thing...look at how the long haired idiot sticks his elbow into the coach as he hits him.Where I come from,a natural thing is if you were to run full steam into me and as you near me,ya jam your elbow into me...I'm going to respond bye trying to KNOCK YOUR *** OUT !
 
I think the whole profession of sports journalism is a fraud. I've been watching more of NFLN and ESPN lately since we made the playoffs, as well as more print media than usual. I'm convinced that 90% or more of these clowns just talk to hear themselves talk. They have no more insight than you or me. **** them all.
 
That article is not only extremely biased in its description of events in the Bengals games, but it also says that Tomlin deliberately tripped Jacoby Jones on the sideline during that Ravens game. Hack writing to fluff up one analyst's opinion. Is the author a blogger or a journalist?
 
Mike Tomlin's $100,000 to the league for the tripping incident says otherwise.

Papillon
 
I like Whitlock's stuff. He's a rare football journalist because he actually played college football, and tells it like it is.

The opposite of a brown nose. Tomlin should be judged on his actions, not race.
 
I watched his whole interview on The Herd - yeah, protect Starvin Marvin by attacking Tomlin....brilliant.

What a douche.
 
Whitlock is a lazy click bait *****.

It actually takes time and effort to do a complete analysis and write a meaningful and/or impactful article. It's easier to just go Limbaugh on people.
 
I believe in the the entirety of the clip regarding Nelson, there is reason to believe Nelson is making unnecessary advance on Toussaint after the play is over. I don't think Munch is trying to pull his hair so much as restrain him from making a "heat of the moment" mistake in continuing a play out of bounds. It certainly LOOKS like Nelson takes an extra and completely unnecessary step towards Toussaint after both players' initial momentum has been stopped. Therefore I think Munch is reacting. In the act his hand DOES become entangled with spider hair. That's just going to be a side-effect from a guy who doesn't wash his hair for 6 years. It gets tangled and nasty like that - easy to get tangled up in.

I'm not trying to be mean, that's just logic.

I felt at the time that Shazier was being tasteless in his celebration after the hit on their running back. I believed it was going to incite the Bengals. Clearly it did. Shazier would have been better served as would the team had he simply gone to the sideline and gone about his business. Neither Greg Lloyd nor James Harrison would ever have put on such a display. That said, I can understand a young man celebrating a career day and a fumble recovery returned for a TD. I can also understand getting ahead on a hated rival, particularly one with a record of cheap-shots. But the truth is, we like to believe we hold ourselves to a higher standard and the celebration while a player is hurt is most assuredly NOT that standard. I cannot be truly supportive of that. I am quite proud of all the rest of Shazier's accomplishments in the game. He was absolutely our MVP.

Mr. Whitlock would do well to watch the clips of THAT segment carefully. There are MANY Bengals coaches on the field. One of them even puts his hands on a Steeler player. I expect Whitlock will be putting together a segment shrieking about the poor coaching of Lewis and how he cannot control his coaching as well.

Regarding the Jones incident, all contact was initiated by Bengals players. Porter was following Brown, Burfict put his hand on Brown, it was pushed away by a trainer who believed the gesture wholly inappropriate. That hand struck Porter. Porter reacted verbally to Burfict. Then Porter was struck again, in the back by the Bengals defensive tackle. At this point, you'll note Porter's hands are to his sides. He neither touches any player nor makes any purposeful physical contact whatsoever. The contact with the defensive player pushes Porter into a group of Bengals. Porter didn't seek them out, he was pushed into them. At that point he cannot disentangle himself WITHOUT initiating contact with one of them unless they move and make a way for him to leave. They do not do so. There is no audio, but it appears that Porter does not engage in a yelling match. He does not even appear to speak. He does "smirk". Undoubtedly this act of condescension causes frustration on the part of the Bengals, but he has done nothing physically or apparently verbally to escalate the encounter.

It would seem the smirk was enough, however to send Jones into a rage as HE initiates contact with a referee, pushing his way past in order to engage with Porter. That is what drew the penalty flag. At no point did Porter initiate anything whatsoever. And THAT is what is so enraging to the Bengals. They did it entirely to themselves.

And with that, I'm completely done with them. Logic is lost on beasts. They're un-trainable. Like dogs that cannot be housebroken.
 
I like Whitlock's stuff. He's a rare football journalist because he actually played college football, and tells it like it is.

The opposite of a brown nose. Tomlin should be judged on his actions, not race.

I'm not sure what Whitlock is getting at or what his end game is with this piece. Is he saying that Tomlin should have been fired for lack of performance? the Jacoby Jones incident? I don't understand why the piece was written and to what end. So, he thinks he's above reproach, where's the list egregious actions that deserve for Mike Tomlin to be excoriated?

Jacoby Jones - He was fined $100K for this idiotic move, Bill Cowher stepped onto the field mocking a tackle attempt on a kick or punt returner, he also walked up to a referee and stuffed a picture in his shirt pocket (you shouldn't touch a ref period), Belechick and the Patriots bending of the rules is well documented, so why should Mike Tomlin be held to something other coaches haven't been held to?

Munchak/Porter - Porter being on the field is such a non-starter that I can't even believe its being talked about, there were coaches and players from both teams milling around like they were at a spring picnic while AB was being attended to. Porter being on the field is only being emphasized now because the NFL and its lackeys in the media are trying to deflect some of the dirt from Burfict and Jones, by saying, "Oh, but look , Joey Porter was somewhere he shouldn't have been." Whether Munchak grabbed Nelson's hair on purpose or not, he'll be fined and that should end that. How are these two events even being compared to Burfict's hit?

What else has Mike Tomlin done that deserves for him to be treated any differently than he has been by the media? They don't like his loquacious, but uninformative answers to questions so Whitlock is going to try and make something up that doesn't exist. The article is originating from the 'cincyjungle" that tells you all you need to know, losers will be losers and there isn't any amount of perfume going to hide the odor emanating from "The Jungle".

Papillon
 
Top