• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Israel Is Bombing Iran

Either way, it’s something the United States doesn’t need to be involved in. I remember when “no new wars” and “no forever wars” was a rallying cry. Our involvement is something I can’t get behind just because I voted for the guy involving us in it.
I think the only reason we did was the lack of anyone else, like Israel having the munitions or skill needed. Had we been able to just give them the munitions and let their pilots do it I think we would have. If we have to do anything prolonged, I will agree with you.
 
We’ve entered a war he warned against and claimed his political adversaries would start. You were against it before you were for it. Please reconcile.
I don't like it but I believe it was the only real option as no one else had the ability to do it and it did have to be done. As I told Sarge it needs to end with this. The ball is now in Iran's court.
 
I think the only reason we did was the lack of anyone else, like Israel having the munitions or skill needed. Had we been able to just give them the munitions and let their pilots do it I think we would have. If we have to do anything prolonged, I will agree with you.
We’ll see how far we get dragged into this. This is how it starts. The last thing this country needs is to be drawn into another prolonged war that serves nothing more than further filling the coffers of the military industrial complex. This reeks of going after “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq.
 
We’ll see how far we get dragged into this. This is how it starts. The last thing this country needs is to be drawn into another prolonged war that serves nothing more than further filling the coffers of the military industrial complex. This reeks of going after “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq.
Maybe, in the respect that it could turn into something prolonged, but from what I've read they have been enriching uranium way beyond the amount needed to keep the lights on.
Of course, my comment depends on whether what I've read is actually true or not.

Either way, this action was warranted, if only to slow the progression in their attempt to kill all the infidels.
 
We’ll see how far we get dragged into this. This is how it starts. The last thing this country needs is to be drawn into another prolonged war that serves nothing more than further filling the coffers of the military industrial complex. This reeks of going after “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq.
Off top of head that makes Yemen, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan where the country has had military operations/war in the past couple decades since 911 maybe forgetting a few.

And analysts wondered how the MIC would eat after the fall of communism..
 
Meh, Iran sponsors more terrorism than probably the rest of the world combined... i'm certain I dont want them to have Nukes... though I guess Id have first tried the threat that if they didnt 100% tear down that nuke program and let un inspectors in, we would give israel 50 nukes and find a use for radioactive glass...

Seriously, id rather us have sold the stuff to do this to the Israeli and stayed out of it, but if they really thought they were that close to nukes, it had to be done... they are stupid enough to use them for petty vengeance...
 
Maybe, in the respect that it could turn into something prolonged, but from what I've read they have been enriching uranium way beyond the amount needed to keep the lights on.
Of course, my comment depends on whether what I've read is actually true or not.

Either way, this action was warranted, if only to slow the progression in their attempt to kill all the infidels.
The report from the IAEA on May 25th said Iran had 60% enriched uranium and was only allowed 20%. 60% had no civilian use and they had enough to produce 9 bombs in as little as 3 weeks. Assuming this report is correct i think that's why this strike happened so rapidly
 
We’ll see how far we get dragged into this. This is how it starts. The last thing this country needs is to be drawn into another prolonged war that serves nothing more than further filling the coffers of the military industrial complex. This reeks of going after “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq.
I don't see it anything like Iraq. International sources and committees, ones we don't particularly even care for have found they were in breach of feeble agreement that was in place. If they couldn't even honor that piece of trash agreement it was time to take action. Sadly, the rest of Europe has no backbone to do it themselves. Something Trump is trying to fix with forcing more GDP spending on defense in NATO.

Iran threatens nuclear escalation after UN watchdog board finds it in breach of obligations​

Frederik Pleitgen
By Mostafa Salem and Frederik Pleitgen, CNN
3 minute read
Published 7:33 AM EDT, Thu June 12, 2025






A view before the start of quarterly Board of Governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria, on June 9.

A view before the start of quarterly Board of Governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria, on June 9.
Lisa Leutner/Reuters
CNN —
Iran has warned it will ramp up its nuclear activities after the United Nations nuclear watchdog’s 35-member board of governors adopted a resolution Thursday declaring it in breach of its non-proliferation obligations.

Tehran retaliated by announcing the launch of a new uranium enrichment center and the installation of advanced centrifuges – an escalatory move likely to complicate nuclear talks with the United States set to resume this weekend.

Nations attending the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) board meeting in Vienna voted on the resolution, with 19 in favor, 3 against and 11 abstentions, Reuters reported.


ADVERTISING


The IAEA has previously accused Iran of non-cooperation but Thursday’s move marks an official finding of non-compliance and raises the prospect of escalating the issue to the UN Security Council.

The resolution was tabled by European countries and the US after a May 31 IAEA report found Iran to be non-compliant in its nuclear duties, including failing to answer questions on uranium particles found in undeclared sites in the country, and its stockpiling of uranium enriched to nearly weapons grade. Iran says the IAEA report was politicized.

This photo from 2020 shows the US Embassy in Iraq.
Related articleUS withdraws some diplomats and military families from Middle East amid Iran tensions
Uranium is a nuclear fuel that, when highly enriched, can be used to make a bomb. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

Tehran condemned the US, the United Kingdom, France and Germany for tabling the resolution and said it has “no option but to respond.”

Enter your email to subscribe to the CNN Fareed Zakaria global analysis newsletter.
close dialog
CNN Fareed's Global Briefing

Access Fareed Zakaria's global affairs insights
Sign up for Fareed's Global Briefing newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our
Terms of Use
and
Privacy Policy.

Sign up
A day ahead of the vote, a senior Iranian official told CNN that “Iran intends to launch a series of retaliatory nuclear measures as soon as the resolution is adopted at the IAEA.”

“These measures include scaling back cooperation with the agency and imposing certain restrictions, activating advanced and new-generation centrifuges, and removing monitoring cameras from the Isfahan facility,” the official said.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X last week: “Mark my words, as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights.”

In 2022, the IAEA censured Iran over uranium particles found at the undeclared sites. Iran also dismissed that motion as “politicized,” and responded by removing surveillance cameras from key sites – depriving negotiators of up-to-date information on its enrichment program.

Heightened tensions​

The IAEA board resolution comes as Tehran and Washington are in the midst of complicated negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.

The two nations will hold indirect talks in the Omani capital, Muscat, on Sunday for the sixth time, Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi said on X Thursday. Despite multiple rounds of negotiations over a new nuclear deal, a major sticking point remains: Iran’s insistence on its right to enrich uranium.

An Iranian newspaper with a cover photo of US President Donald Trump and US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff in Tehran, Iran, on Wednesday.

An Iranian newspaper with a cover photo of US President Donald Trump and US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff in Tehran, Iran, on Wednesday.
Majid Asgaripour/Wana News Agency/Reuters
Trump has said he’s grown less confident in being able to strike a deal with Iran, saying in a new interview that Tehran could be “delaying” striking an agreement.

“I’m getting more and more less confident about it. They seem to be delaying, and I think that’s a shame, but I’m less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,” Trump said in an interview with a New York Post podcast that was released on Wednesday.

Regional tensions have escalated significantly ahead of the next round of talks.

On Wednesday night, the US State and Defense departments made efforts to arrange the departure of non-essential personnel from locations around the Middle East, according to US officials and sources familiar with the efforts. It’s not clear what caused the change in posture, but a defense official said US Central Command is monitoring “developing tension in the Middle East.”

Trump said the personnel are being moved out “because it could be a dangerous place, and we’ll see what happens. But they have been or we’ve given notice to move out, and we’ll see what happens.”

On Thursday, the US embassy in Jerusalem also issued a security alert restricting US government staff and their families from traveling outside of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Be’er Sheva until further notice.
 
The report from the IAEA on May 25th said Iran had 60% enriched uranium and was only allowed 20%. 60% had no civilian use and they had enough to produce 9 bombs in as little as 3 weeks.
I heard it was more like 50%
 
I don't see it anything like Iraq. International sources and committees, ones we don't particularly even care for have found they were in breach of feeble agreement that was in place. If they couldn't even honor that piece of trash agreement it was time to take action. Sadly, the rest of Europe has no backbone to do it themselves. Something Trump is trying to fix with forcing more GDP spending on defense in NATO.

Iran threatens nuclear escalation after UN watchdog board finds it in breach of obligations​

Frederik Pleitgen
By Mostafa Salem and Frederik Pleitgen, CNN
3 minute read
Published 7:33 AM EDT, Thu June 12, 2025






A view before the start of quarterly Board of Governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria, on June 9.

A view before the start of quarterly Board of Governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria, on June 9.
Lisa Leutner/Reuters
CNN —
Iran has warned it will ramp up its nuclear activities after the United Nations nuclear watchdog’s 35-member board of governors adopted a resolution Thursday declaring it in breach of its non-proliferation obligations.

Tehran retaliated by announcing the launch of a new uranium enrichment center and the installation of advanced centrifuges – an escalatory move likely to complicate nuclear talks with the United States set to resume this weekend.

Nations attending the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) board meeting in Vienna voted on the resolution, with 19 in favor, 3 against and 11 abstentions, Reuters reported.


ADVERTISING


The IAEA has previously accused Iran of non-cooperation but Thursday’s move marks an official finding of non-compliance and raises the prospect of escalating the issue to the UN Security Council.

The resolution was tabled by European countries and the US after a May 31 IAEA report found Iran to be non-compliant in its nuclear duties, including failing to answer questions on uranium particles found in undeclared sites in the country, and its stockpiling of uranium enriched to nearly weapons grade. Iran says the IAEA report was politicized.

This photo from 2020 shows the US Embassy in Iraq.
Related articleUS withdraws some diplomats and military families from Middle East amid Iran tensions
Uranium is a nuclear fuel that, when highly enriched, can be used to make a bomb. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

Tehran condemned the US, the United Kingdom, France and Germany for tabling the resolution and said it has “no option but to respond.”

Enter your email to subscribe to the CNN Fareed Zakaria global analysis newsletter.
close dialog
CNN Fareed's Global Briefing's Global Briefing

Access Fareed Zakaria's global affairs insights
Sign up for Fareed's Global Briefing newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our
Terms of Use
and
Privacy Policy.

Sign up
A day ahead of the vote, a senior Iranian official told CNN that “Iran intends to launch a series of retaliatory nuclear measures as soon as the resolution is adopted at the IAEA.”

“These measures include scaling back cooperation with the agency and imposing certain restrictions, activating advanced and new-generation centrifuges, and removing monitoring cameras from the Isfahan facility,” the official said.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X last week: “Mark my words, as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights.”

In 2022, the IAEA censured Iran over uranium particles found at the undeclared sites. Iran also dismissed that motion as “politicized,” and responded by removing surveillance cameras from key sites – depriving negotiators of up-to-date information on its enrichment program.

Heightened tensions​

The IAEA board resolution comes as Tehran and Washington are in the midst of complicated negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.

The two nations will hold indirect talks in the Omani capital, Muscat, on Sunday for the sixth time, Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi said on X Thursday. Despite multiple rounds of negotiations over a new nuclear deal, a major sticking point remains: Iran’s insistence on its right to enrich uranium.

An Iranian newspaper with a cover photo of US President Donald Trump and US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff in Tehran, Iran, on Wednesday.

An Iranian newspaper with a cover photo of US President Donald Trump and US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff in Tehran, Iran, on Wednesday.
Majid Asgaripour/Wana News Agency/Reuters
Trump has said he’s grown less confident in being able to strike a deal with Iran, saying in a new interview that Tehran could be “delaying” striking an agreement.

“I’m getting more and more less confident about it. They seem to be delaying, and I think that’s a shame, but I’m less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,” Trump said in an interview with a New York Post podcast that was released on Wednesday.

Regional tensions have escalated significantly ahead of the next round of talks.

On Wednesday night, the US State and Defense departments made efforts to arrange the departure of non-essential personnel from locations around the Middle East, according to US officials and sources familiar with the efforts. It’s not clear what caused the change in posture, but a defense official said US Central Command is monitoring “developing tension in the Middle East.”

Trump said the personnel are being moved out “because it could be a dangerous place, and we’ll see what happens. But they have been or we’ve given notice to move out, and we’ll see what happens.”

On Thursday, the US embassy in Jerusalem also issued a security alert restricting US government staff and their families from traveling outside of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Be’er Sheva until further notice.
Iran agreed to inspections, before they didn't.
 
.cool
Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia, said Sunday that President Donald Trump "has pushed the US into another war" and that countries are "ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads

Talk is just talk. Let's see if this actually comes to fruition. If it does, it'll likely be interesting days for the donors
 
We’ll see how far we get dragged into this. This is how it starts. The last thing this country needs is to be drawn into another prolonged war that serves nothing more than further filling the coffers of the military industrial complex. This reeks of going after “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq.
Their Supreme Leader is right there on video with several other men burning the American flag and chanting death to the USA. Who buries a Nuclear facility a football field below a mountain?

F em.
 
Last edited:
.cool
Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia, said Sunday that President Donald Trump "has pushed the US into another war" and that countries are "ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads

That will NEVER happen because if they said they were going to do that, Trump would say that he was going to directly supply Ukraine with Nukes and that would be the end of it.
 
Last edited:
Do you want Iran, whose mantra is Death To America; having nukes? I don’t.
What about Pakistan, India, China, Russia, France and UK? Which country loves the US?
 
This was a nice display of military might that should be motivational to anyone looking to mess with the US or it's allies.

That said, the lack of commentary from the EU, the UK, etc. is interesting.
 
Have those countries threatened Israel and the United States like Iran has?
Not.......yet. The Russians gave the Indians nukes when they were more pissed at the Chinese, who decided that Pakistan should have some to to keep India with at least 2 disgruntled neighbors.

Luckily, just last week the Pakistanis were talking about a Nobel Peace prize for DJT, lol.
 
Top