• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Iran

Hypocycloids said:
So you can’t access the files, but you know for a fact crimes are being covered up.

You’re pretty amazing.

Ask yourself if you would bet your life’s savings on it.
Not so sure now are you?

That’s the way you should approach this.
Click to expand...
You act like I’m the only one crying foul. Step outside your news bubble.
 
Badcat said:
Dude, C'mon. I read the article and it was so slanted it matched the angle of your forehead. The truth is, Trump mentions bajebus and that the troops were carrying out a mission from God and the media spins it into meaning "Trump says he was chosen by bajebus as our savior! Cheetos is dillulu!"

Go back under your rock.
Click to expand...
Right, you don’t care if it’s true or not.
 
Troglodyte said:
You act like I’m the only one crying foul. Step outside your news bubble.
Click to expand...

Yes, you and a bunch of other TDS afflicted morons, so no, you’re not the only one.

Answer the question, would you bet your life savings on it?
Yes? No?

The problem here isn’t us, it’s you.

No one is denying that there may **** in there that implicates Trump.
You however are insisting there is.
 
Last edited:
Hypocycloids said:
Yes, you and a bunch of other TDS afflicted morons, so no, you’re not the only one.

Answer the question, would you bet your life savings on it?
Yes? No?

The problem here isn’t us, it’s you.

No one is denying that there may **** in there that implicates Trump.
You however are insisting there is.
Click to expand...
So MTG and Thom Massie have TDS?

Given everything that has transpired and everything is not being released or seemingly covered up, how do you come to any other conclusion that there must be evidence that implicates Trump?

If you’re suspected of something reprehensible and your innocent, wouldn’t you want the evidence released?

When you don’t care how much smoke there is, that’s denial.
 
Troglodyte said:
So MTG and Thom Massie have TDS?

Given everything that has transpired and everything is not being released or seemingly covered up, how do you come to any other conclusion that there must be evidence that implicates Trump?

If you’re suspected of something reprehensible and your innocent, wouldn’t you want the evidence released?

When you don’t care how much smoke there is, that’s denial.
Click to expand...
He doesn’t necessarily have to be covering up for himself. He could just as easily be covering for friends or donors, and that’s assuming he’s covering for anyone. I think he’s covering for himself, others or both. Something tells me we’ll never know for sure.
 
Troglodyte said:
So MTG and Thom Massie have TDS?

Given everything that has transpired and everything is not being released or seemingly covered up, how do you come to any other conclusion that there must be evidence that implicates Trump?

If you’re suspected of something reprehensible and your innocent, wouldn’t you want the evidence released?

When you don’t care how much smoke there is, that’s denial.
Click to expand...
Would you bet your savings that there definitely is **** on Trump in those files.
Yes? No?
 
Last edited:
Troglodyte said:
You’ll forgive me for wanting our military commanders to be grounded in reality and not end or days ideology.
Click to expand...

Oh wow!! You’re forgiven. That certainly will have a damning effect on the way they conduct business.
I wish he hadn’t made those comments so as not to have offend your touchy thin skinned liberal self.

Generals George Washington, Stonewall Jackson, George Patton have all prayed to Jesus our Lord and Savior, and still were grounded in reality. No?

Now go dig up something else to be offended about and let us know what it is that troubles you.
 
Last edited:
Troglodyte said:
3 posts, you idiot.
Click to expand...

Thanks for confirming my point. I said you get confused after 2 posts. Which you did. If any back and forth goes 3, 4, 7, 12 posts, you get so lost you forget what you are arguing. In this case there were 3 and you were lost after the first 2.

Troglodyte said:
You mean if it happened prior to their other term that began eight years prior. It would be odd, yes.
Click to expand...

No, I stand by what I mean. Your logic is moronic. The fact that Iran's 47 years of crimes predates Trump AND existed under Trump has no bearing whatsoever on what he should or should not do. Your argument is baseless.

Troglodyte said:
You’re the king of stupid arguments, and if you haven’t noticed, people have agreed with me on that, and not just Tibs.
Click to expand...

Just Tibs. Trust me, just Tibs.

Troglodyte said:
“Owed or not”? No, it was owed. Not a donation.
Click to expand...

Owed is an interesting term and this isn't binary nor black and white. Since you never get beyond headlines, and certainly not the first paragraph, a little history (this will cost you another $19.95 Venmo payment (payable to YourDaddy@Venmo).

Education:
The $1.7Billion was a result of the failed 1979 Arms Deal (something you’ve never heard of). You may note that 1979 was when the Shah was deposed, democracy ended, and your beloved IRGC and the Mullahs took over Iran.

Iran, under the Shah, had placed a $400Million order for military equipment (F-16 fighters, destroyers, etc).

When the IRGC took over, they wanted to cancel the order and get the money back - you know, so they could build bombs and fund terrorism.

Well the deal collapsed due to Iran’s huge financial crisis, a reduced strategic role after the Shah was deposed, political unrest….and then Iran took Americans hostage (I’m sure you’ve forgotten about this also) and we froze their assets.

Seems like a pretty smart thing to do.

The Shah and the prior Government of Iran was owed $400M. Not the IRGC that was kidnapping Americans.

Obama capitulated. Many of us agree, they (the IRGC) were never entitled to this refund, especially with interest.

You’re welcome.

Troglodyte said:
No. It’s up to the DOJ to prove he, and others are, not cover up their crimes. Do you see how unhinged you’ve become?
Click to expand...

BINGO. It's up to the DOJ to prove he and others are guilty. Has this happened? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Until then, the presumption of innocence prevails. I know this is hard for you to grasp, as you were ready to hang him when Russia Russia Russia started.

Troglodyte said:
I’m not allowed to access the files.
Click to expand...

Proof you get lost after 2 posts. You said "You were for the release of the files, now you defend them being withheld." I said provide proof that those are my positions by providing evidence.

Your response: You're not allowed to access the Epstein files.

giphy.gif
 
Ron Burgundy said:
The TDS brain works like this:

The fact that there is no evidence of Trump doing anything illegal with Epstein means there is evidence that is being covered up.
Click to expand...

I swear during Trumps first term some democrat politician said something to the effect of “we must impeach, (or indict) Trump to find out what he did wrong”.
I came up empty with Google and AI.
Maybe it was just a meme.
 
Sarge said:
He doesn’t necessarily have to be covering up for himself. He could just as easily be covering for friends or donors, and that’s assuming he’s covering for anyone. I think he’s covering for himself, others or both. Something tells me we’ll never know for sure.
Click to expand...
And how much less of a crime would that be?

Pedophilia cases (Catholic church, Penn State) seem to always come to light years after the fact. Denial dies a slow death.

Something’s rotten.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top