Because he's how old? We are talking about last year anyways, he should've come in on passing downs, as he proved vs KC.And, yet, went unsigned.
Sent from my XT1585 using Steeler Nation mobile app
Because he's how old? We are talking about last year anyways, he should've come in on passing downs, as he proved vs KC.And, yet, went unsigned.
Yeah, this year, not last year.
Last year he was signed by New England, and was still good enough to play in the Super Bowl.
What's hard for you to understand?
Because he's how old? We are talking about last year anyways, he should've come in on passing downs, as he proved vs KC.
Sent from my XT1585 using Steeler Nation mobile app
I'm not up in arms, I'm not saying he should've been starter, but he should've come in on passing downs, anyone that watched saw Dupree wasn't getting to the QB, hell they switched his position because he wasn't getting I done. I don't care about stats, Harrison was far more disruptive in the little time he played than Dupree was.His last full season with the Steelers he had 5 sacks. Having 2 with NE cannot be extrapolated to a full season. That is not how it works.
2017 he was only 1 year younger than he is now and, presumably, had less wear and tear on his body in 2017.
What's so hard to understand about: while Harrison "may" have been better than durpee, i also "may" be that the difference was so marginal as to be insignificant. It "may" also be that he wasn't, at all.
See, you've never seen me say he wasn't. You get all up in arms because i suggest he might not have been, or only marginally, so.
If just being 1 year older this year has such an effect after having only light work in 2017, why would 2017 been that much better than 2016 after playing in 16 games ans producing 5 sacks? Might it have been? I suppose so. Is there significant evidence to support that? Nope.
Well, last season (you know, when Harrison was released by Tomlin) he was still good enough to record 2 sacks and 5 tackles in 1 game for the Patriots. While Bud Dupree had a grand total of 6 sacks and 31 tackles in 15 games for the Steelers.
Im told it was obvious he was better than durpee. My question is obvious. If that was/is true, why didn't anyone else sign him for the last season.
Moats wasn't signed this year he did radio for SNR.not sure what that has to do w/ anything, but I dont think chick / moats would be signed either. I can understand the team sticking w/ Dupree even though he was not performing, but I do not understand putting in chick / moats and not even dressing Harrison. Its not like they provided great coverage skills...
I'm not up in arms, I'm not saying he should've been starter, but he should've come in on passing downs, anyone that watched saw Dupree wasn't getting to the QB, hell they switched his position because he wasn't getting I done. I don't care about stats, Harrison was far more disruptive in the little time he played than Dupree was.
Sent from my XT1585 using Steeler Nation mobile app
If I were to make up a scenario it would be that he told Tomlin something or made it obvious that he didn't like the way Tomlin let players act and Tomlin punished him. Remember his tweet - "What you permit, you promote. What you allow, you encourage. What you condone, you own". What doesn't make sense in this scenario is him hanging out with AB, who I think would be one of the players getting away with ****.Tomlin didnt even give him a fair chance in what everyone knew was his last season. That is ****** in my opinion. Real ******.
Im told it was obvious he was better than durpee. My question is obvious. If that was/is true, why didn't anyone else sign him for the last season.
Bullshit. You didn't read my post and are trying to ask me about something I didn't say. Why is the sky blue? Answering that has as much to do with my post as what you are asking me.
Whatever floats your boat, skippy.
Don't blow it off now. Tell me where I said what you say I said. You can't skippy. You didn't read it, you just thought you knew what it said. Obviously you were wrong but that **** still needs to be stirred so stirred it.
So, you don't think Harrison was better. Glad we agree.
His last full season with the Steelers he had 5 sacks. Having 2 with NE cannot be extrapolated to a full season. That is not how it works.
2017 he was only 1 year younger than he is now and, presumably, had less wear and tear on his body in 2017.
What's so hard to understand about: while Harrison "may" have been better than durpee, i also "may" be that the difference was so marginal as to be insignificant. It "may" also be that he wasn't, at all.
See, you've never seen me say he wasn't. You get all up in arms because i suggest he might not have been, or only marginally, so.
If just being 1 year older this year has such an effect after having only light work in 2017, why would 2017 been that much better than 2016 after playing in 16 games ans producing 5 sacks? Might it have been? I suppose so. Is there significant evidence to support that? Nope.