So where do scouts come into play? Just curious on your opinion. Is our drafting just Tombert or is there more to it than that?
I don't think the scouts "stack" the board. Maybe they sell a guy during a sit down meeting with Tombert about the board, but it's ultimately Tombert that is stacking the board and putting a player like Golson ahead of a player like P.J. Williams. Or a player like Archer ahead of Bryant.
Remember, a big board for a specific team is a lot more about elimination than selection. They have so much more information than just the game tapes. Rumors around school, psyche evaluation, interview, et. al. The more information, the more possibilities Tombert says "I don't like that about the guy" and down he falls on the board.
My impression of both Archer and Golson is that both excel with the intangibles Tomlin likes. Kind of the "small kid on the block" that has to stand up to the big guys his whole life. The underdogs. Great work ethic. Won't back down from a fight. Spence was undersized. Same type of character. Antonio Brown was the same way (but at least he was a 6th rounder).
And it's not just the small guys. We've seen it time and again under the Tombert regime they seem to get fixated on certain prospects that they "fall in love with". It's part of the reason for the quick triggers on turning in the card. They know what they want and nothing that happens on draft day is changing their mind.
To me ever since Tomlin arrived there's been a lot more emotion involved with our draft choices. Tomlin doesn't seem logical or cool-headed in his draft thought process. I worry he talks up prospects in his brain during the process. Finds a guy he likes and over-inflates their actual value. Especially on the defensive side of the ball.
One of the reasons I like to keep coaches coach and GM's manage is just because of that scout process errors that occurs if you start to think too much about how great it would be to coach a guy rather than think whether the guys has the skills to succeed. Coaching up guys you don't like is part of what makes a good coach. Coaching guys you like is easy.
But at this level, talent still rules the roost. Not coachability.