As I understand it, the NFL sent an investigator (a female investigator) to interview the complainant in this case. The NFL's female investigator stated that the woman filing the complaint was not credible, basically the investigator didn't believe her. The police also had an issue with her credibility and declined to file charges.
So there is no evidence that what this woman said occurred actually occurred. No one who has spoken to this woman believes her story, and Elliot denied it from the beginning. So with all that lack of evidence, and the NFL's own investigator reporting that she didn't believe it happened, Rog goes ahead and imposes a 6-game suspension.
Given all that, what exactly is Elliot supposed to accept responsibility for?
yeah, the NFL is trying to make itself look good, but refuses to come down on Tyreke Hill and looks the other way in regards to lesser known players.
And not that I think that Ben was accused of it on more than the two instances. But Id be willing to bet both players have been sat down and told no more issues. Whuch is what happens when you slap wrists or look the other way. You become a co conspirator. The NFL cant say we know xyz too. Or they will become co defendants in the lawsuits.The same *** thing that Ben was guilty of: Bad publicity for the NFL...aka "tarnishing the shield".
What ever it takes to get rid of the"rog" and his far left bullshit.
Salute the nation
I'm with Jerry on that. I'm still pissed over the little paterisks****** evidence destruction. I'm a grudge holder and don't forget a damn thing until justice has been truly served.