• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Election Shenanigans Thread

I think it's more likely that Trump wins NY than PA. In NY the Dims aren't thinking that they need to print thousands of phony ballots.
Meantime there will be precincts in Pittsburgh, Erie, and Philly that will have 135% voter turnout.
 
Troglodyte said:
You should watch last night’s 60 minutes and listen to what Republicans have to about voting security and how much voter fraud actually exists.
Click to expand...
How about YOU answer the question and stop deflecting, take some accountability here.
 
Superman said:
what's that got to do with - as he said - dead people voting?

even your beloved Snopes says it happens.

and as badcat said - more dead people vote than have scored touchdowns in any football game.
Click to expand...
And it’s relevant how? How many elections has it come even remotely close to changing? Here’s a hint: NONE. EVER.

Again, watch the 60 minutes episodes, step outside your misinformation echo chamber.
 
go Flogtard, go!

 
Badcat said:
How about YOU answer the question and stop deflecting, take some accountability here.
Click to expand...
What’s your point? How is dead people voting relevant? In which election did it change the outcome?
 
Troglodyte said:
And it’s relevant how? How many elections has it come even remotely close to changing? Here’s a hint: NONE. EVER.

Again, watch the 60 minutes episodes, step outside your misinformation echo chamber.
Click to expand...
i watched it, and began to wonder why i'm wasting precious moments of my life watching a far left MSM echo chamber looking for confirmation validation about something we all know is true.
 
60 minutes and CBS shouldn't be permitted to call themselves news. They aren't. They manipulate.
 
Superman said:
i watched it, and began to wonder why i'm wasting precious moments of my life watching a far left MSM echo chamber looking for confirmation validation about something we all know is true.
Click to expand...
No one is denying that TRUMP asked Raffensperger to throw the election. I bet that’s the part where you turned it off. Ammiright???
 
This will continue until someone in the House has the intestinal fortitude to introduce a bill on how elections will be held.
Paper ballots, hand counted, election day voting only, absentee ballots limited for military personnel, etc., election day is a national holiday and polls open for 24 hours.
ID's, ID's, ID's, no one should be in favor of non-US citizens voting. And election results need to be known the night of the election, no excuses.

Until this happens, the loser of any election will be screaming and filing lawsuits. It shouldn't be this complicated, make the insanity end.
 
ZonaBurgh said:
Not sure the county is a reliable source, but according to them there are 2,587,196 registered voters in the county, 917,074 R, 739,701 D, the balance being G, L, and I.
As of a week ago over 1 million ballots have been turned in with about 100,000 more registered Republicans voting than Democrats. Funny how they know that already.

State wide about 4.4 million voters with Republicans holding a 300,000 edge. Seems like it should be statistically impossible for them to lose.
Click to expand...

996w52.jpg
 
Trump and Harris are both in Pittsburgh tonight.
 
ZonaBurgh said:
Not sure the county is a reliable source, but according to them there are 2,587,196 registered voters in the county, 917,074 R, 739,701 D, the balance being G, L, and I.
As of a week ago over 1 million ballots have been turned in with about 100,000 more registered Republicans voting than Democrats. Funny how they know that already.

State wide about 4.4 million voters with Republicans holding a 300,000 edge. Seems like it should be statistically impossible for them to lose.
Click to expand...
Except that they're laying groundwork for a long delay (so they can figure out how many they have to print.)

Total horseshit.
 
ZonaBurgh said:
This will continue until someone in the House has the intestinal fortitude to introduce a bill on how elections will be held.
Paper ballots, hand counted, election day voting only, absentee ballots limited for military personnel, etc., election day is a national holiday and polls open for 24 hours.
ID's, ID's, ID's, no one should be in favor of non-US citizens voting. And election results need to be known the night of the election, no excuses.

Until this happens, the loser of any election will be screaming and filing lawsuits. It shouldn't be this complicated, make the insanity end.
Click to expand...
I agree with everything but the paper ballots. I think paper ballots would be as easy to fake as anything plus that would be a tall task counting everything. Im not sure how the machines work exactly, but they should not be online and should provide a summary at the end. Reps from both parties should verify that the total ballots cast is the same as the sign in for the polling center.
 
If polling precincts are to large to hand count and verify in 24 hrs, there should be more precincts.

This is not difficult. Show up, show ID, sign in, mark the ballot that is given to you, enter ballot in sealed cardboard box. When box has 100 ballots entered, the box is taken to the counting area. When 5 boxes have accumulated, they are opened at random and counting is begun. Team A is comprised of 2 party observers and a caller. Both observers tally the votes as called and supply a tally sheet for each box. The ballots and tally sheets are sealed in a bag and passed to a second group of observers to have the tally sheets compared without opening said bag. If the sheets match they are tabulated as confirmed and that bag is added to the others confirmed and sealed for security. If the tally sheets are different, the process is repeated by Team B. At the end of each hour teams are rotated between 3-4 teams. All collection boxes, and tally locations, as well as storage areas are to have continuous video surveillance and security.

I actually agree with it being open 24 hrs, and NO CONNECTION TO THE OUTSIDE WORLD.
 
Troglodyte said:
What’s your point? How is dead people voting relevant? In which election did it change the outcome?
Click to expand...
I'll answer your questions when you answer the one that I posed. It really is as simple as you answer the question and then ask a follow up whereby I then answer your question and ask a follow up of my own. THAT is dialog. So, answer my question if you wish for me to answer yours.
 
Badcat said:
I'll answer your questions when you answer the one that I posed. It really is as simple as you answer the question and then ask a follow up whereby I then answer your question and ask a follow up of my own. THAT is dialog. So, answer my question if you wish for me to answer yours.
Click to expand...
No, a dead man has never scored a touchdown. Oh, the dialogue! Now show me where dead people voting has been relevant in the outcome of an election.
 
Troglodyte said:
No one is denying that TRUMP asked Raffensperger to throw the election. I bet that’s the part where you turned it off. Ammiright???
Click to expand...
no, it was maybe a nanosecond after I clicked on the interview via YouTube.
and if you really think what Trump was asking was "throwing the election," you're as dumb as we all figured you to be years ago.
 
Badcat said:
I'll answer your questions when you answer the one that I posed. It really is as simple as you answer the question and then ask a follow up whereby I then answer your question and ask a follow up of my own. THAT is dialog. So, answer my question if you wish for me to answer yours.
Click to expand...
He won't, ever, because with nothing to stand on, he can't. Really, just a waste of your time, even the entertainment factor is wearing thin.
 
Troglodyte said:
No, a dead man has never scored a touchdown. Oh, the dialogue! Now show me where dead people voting has been relevant in the outcome of an election.
Click to expand...
Thank you! Holy ****...getting you to answer a simple question shouldn't be this difficult.

Now, to answer your question, my point was not that dead people voting has been relevant to election outcomes, it was simply noted that dead people have voted.

With that in mind, it's noted that people who never requested a ballot are receiving them, and in some cases, multiple ballots. If there are over 18,000 dead people on voter records in Virgina dating back to 1960 (this is a fact) then there is potential for 18,000 ballots mailed to the address on record for those dead people. If even half of those people recieving said ballots fills them in, it could influence an election. The fact of the matter is that mail in voting is new, and we really don't have data on fraud just yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top