- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
WTF
A 20-year-old armed man with a rifle, handgun and body armor was stopped and arrested outside a Missouri Walmart
No, can't be another nut job
he's lucky he wasn't shot on sight
WTF
A 20-year-old armed man with a rifle, handgun and body armor was stopped and arrested outside a Missouri Walmart
Crazy people will find a way to kill innocent people.
Crazy people will find a way to kill innocent people. They can use a number of different instruments to do it.
According to NBC Bay Area, on early Thursday morning, an 18-year-old woman was hospitalized after receiving several injuries to the face by a group of women armed with sporks.
Police said the woman was dining at a 24-hour restaurant in the 800 block of Mission Street in San Francisco at approximately 3:50 AM when she got involved in a fight with a group of at least four other women, the news station reported.
During the fight, the teenager was allegedly held down by the women, who slashed her face several times with the plastic utensil
WTF
A 20-year-old armed man with a rifle, handgun and body armor was stopped and arrested outside a Missouri Walmart
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...rrested-outside-springfield-missouri-walmart/
This ought to **** up the narrative. An off duty fireman who was packing a handgun held this **** at gunpoint until the cops arrived. Most likely saved a bunch of lives. Wonder what the piece of **** media will make of this. Most likely pretend it didn't happen kinda like the Dayton shooting.
WTF
A 20-year-old armed man with a rifle, handgun and body armor was stopped and arrested outside a Missouri Walmart
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...rrested-outside-springfield-missouri-walmart/
I dunno. Can you blame him? Sounds prudent.
This ought to **** up the narrative. An off duty fireman who was packing a handgun held this **** at gunpoint until the cops arrived. Most likely saved a bunch of lives. Wonder what the piece of **** media will make of this? Most likely pretend it didn't happen kinda like the Dayton shooting.
Look, there is no better weapon for killing people than a gun. It is the right tool for the job.
Can other tools kill people? Of course. Homemade bombs can kill people. Cars can kill people. Knives can kill people. Machetes, axes, throwing people off high places.
But nothing kills better than a gun. That's why you WANT them for self defense. That's why we give them to our military to use in war. That's why we use them to hunt animals (same concept).
Do not pull the "other things kills people too" bullshit. You are smarter than that. I'm not even on the liberal side on this argument. I support the 2nd amendment. Maybe not a blindly or literally as some here, but I'm on your side. Just don't demean me with stupidity when you say knives can do as much damage in the hands of a mass murderer as a gun so maybe we should ban "knives" by comparison.
Gun control will not work for many other reasons:
1. There are too many guns in circulation - 300 million in the U.S. - and banning guns will only get those of law-abiding citizens.
2. Mass murders will still happen so the idea "banning guns will solve the problem" is WAY too simplistic an answer to this problem.
3. We have the 2nd amendment. Any law you propose better stand up in court against challenge. Sometimes I think liberals just ignore the fact this exists when they spout their "proposals".
All of these arguments are much more effective and intelligent that trying to argue that a gun ISN'T designed to be the perfect killing machine. Because that's what it is designed to do. And if it could be designed better, it would and all you gun owners would probably want to own one. It is the PROPER TOOL for the job.
I can drive a nail a LOT of different ways, but there is only one hammer.
You're pretty spot-on here, but I'm going to disagree about the deadliest weapon for a group of people huddled together in an open setting.
There's nothing more devastating than a large truck/van that can run over a large group of people in one shot. That, in the wrong hands, is a devastating killing machine. Several tons of steel/metal coming at flesh and blood at a high speed/velocity, that's the worst of the worst I can think of.
Look, there is no better weapon for killing people than a gun. It is the right tool for the job.
Can other tools kill people? Of course. Homemade bombs can kill people. Cars can kill people. Knives can kill people. Machetes, axes, throwing people off high places.
But nothing kills better than a gun. That's why you WANT them for self defense. That's why we give them to our military to use in war. That's why we use them to hunt animals (same concept).
Do not pull the "other things kills people too" bullshit. You are smarter than that. I'm not even on the liberal side on this argument. I support the 2nd amendment. Maybe not a blindly or literally as some here, but I'm on your side. Just don't demean me with stupidity when you say knives can do as much damage in the hands of a mass murderer as a gun so maybe we should ban "knives" by comparison.
Gun control will not work for many other reasons:
1. There are too many guns in circulation - 300 million in the U.S. - and banning guns will only get those of law-abiding citizens.
2. Mass murders will still happen so the idea "banning guns will solve the problem" is WAY too simplistic an answer to this problem.
3. We have the 2nd amendment. Any law you propose better stand up in court against challenge. Sometimes I think liberals just ignore the fact this exists when they spout their "proposals".
All of these arguments are much more effective and intelligent that trying to argue that a gun ISN'T designed to be the perfect killing machine. Because that's what it is designed to do. And if it could be designed better, it would and all you gun owners would probably want to own one. It is the PROPER TOOL for the job.
I can drive a nail a LOT of different ways, but there is only one hammer.
literally the only time I've heard of this
As stated above, TV has changed so much that the respect for authority and respect of another person's life has truly evaporated. Shows like the Purge - games like Grand Theft Auto - we could go on and on...
#prayersgoingup
There is no doubt it is a complex problem, but if having to give up high cap mag can save even one life then Id say it's worth it.
At least 29 people die every day in drunk driving related incidents. Enough is enough. This daily mass killing has to end. Oh i forgot vehicular homicide is a ok. And we tried the booze ban already.
Just putting things in perspective.
i have used this argument before and got "it's not the same". No one goes after Ford or Chevy or Dodge or the company that made the alcohol. They blame the bartender, the establishment, the waiter, but rarely the person.
At least 29 people die every day in drunk driving related incidents. Enough is enough. This daily mass killing has to end. Oh i forgot vehicular homicide is a ok. And we tried the booze ban already.
Just putting things in perspective.
Where does your "if it saves just one life" argument end? Seriously.
How many die in car accidents worldwide every year? Tens of thousands. Outlaw cars.
How many die from stabbings? Dozens, hundreds. Outlaw knives.
How many people drown? Hundreds. Outlaw swimming.
How many people choke to death on chicken bones? Dozens? Hundreds? Outlaw chickens.
How many are killed by illegal aliens? Answer - hundreds and hundreds.
So I guess you now fully support deporting illegals, all of them, and closing the border as doing so would save not just one life, or ten, or a hundred, BUT HUNDREDS EVERY YEAR.
Where does your "if it saves just one life" argument end? Seriously.
Cars have regulations. You can't drive down the road in a race car. Cars also serve a purpose.
Knives also serve a purpose. Tell me the purpose of a 100 round drum? I have not seen where home invaders have been taken out because the owner had a gun carrying 100 bullets. As for illegals i have no problem deporting them. The rest of your arguments are just plain stupid. The point is no civilian has the need to carry around that kinda ammunition. I am not for banning assault rifles because any semi auto gun could be considered an assault rifle. Besides the dayton shooter actually used a pistol.
feelings do not get to dictate what I can or can not do.