- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 13,485
- Reaction score
- 18,466
- Points
- 113
PFT has the story.  Eagles were careful not to run the "Philly Special" or pretty much any of their other plays because the figured pats would have somebody watching
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ugh-in-the-event-pats-were-watching/#comments
This speaks volumes. When people try to say the pats cheating is no big deal or it was exaggerated, look at a team changing up their Super Bowl preparations as the proof that within the league it is known the pats cheated.
Pats could have lost every single Super Bowl. Each win was by a slim margin. Cheating could be the difference.
Or maybe we are supposed to believe that every other team has to gather multiple pro bowlers and top talents to compete but the pats can just stop offenses with no pass rush and any small white dude can just get open at will for them.
If it was just offensive design, then wouldn't everybody just study the pats offense and call those plays and score 40 points with a bunch of undrafted skill players?
				
			http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ugh-in-the-event-pats-were-watching/#comments
This speaks volumes. When people try to say the pats cheating is no big deal or it was exaggerated, look at a team changing up their Super Bowl preparations as the proof that within the league it is known the pats cheated.
Pats could have lost every single Super Bowl. Each win was by a slim margin. Cheating could be the difference.
Or maybe we are supposed to believe that every other team has to gather multiple pro bowlers and top talents to compete but the pats can just stop offenses with no pass rush and any small white dude can just get open at will for them.
If it was just offensive design, then wouldn't everybody just study the pats offense and call those plays and score 40 points with a bunch of undrafted skill players?
 
				 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		