Democrat Violence Thread
- Thread starter JMM
- Start date
And they don’t care about hygiene.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 23,139
- Reaction score
- 27,457
- Points
- 113
Is it knee jerk reaction or intentional that you always end up on the wrong side of history?
ONE was breaking numerous laws impeding law enforcement, obstructing justice, and attempted murder with a vehicle. The other (to repeat) trespassed.
Both can be argued to have fatefully played FAFO, and both found out.
Good, however, was plainly, evidently, clearly breaking many laws. You refuse to acknowledge this, because you support Leftist illegality.
And the "wife" yells "Drive baby Drive!" after not being able to open the passenger door and let herself in.
And winner of second place in the FAFO Games that day
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,799
- Reaction score
- 6,663
- Points
- 113
So you’re against stand your ground laws?
It has nothing to do with what or how many laws were being broken. It’s about justifying deadly force or not.
All for them. I'm also for laws that prevent the obstruction of justice, impeding law enforcement, violating Terry laws, and attempted murder. So you're against all of the latter?
BINGO. In one case, a LEO's life was clearly in danger, in the other (the Capitol), the LEO's was not.
When you have little in your heart but hate, it reflects on your physical appearance.
I realize that what I say is a generalization, but it seems to hold true with many on the left that are consumed with the hatred for one man or any issue slightly right of center.
They choose not to debate but to lecture, to denigrate the individual than to rationally discuss an issue.
And it's getting worse.
This may be the best analysis I've seen, demonstrating she intended to hit the officer, by reversing to line him up. Encourage all to watch this, esp Floggy. Thank you Tim Pool.
A 37-year-old woman.
Three kids. Middle of a work week.
The father of those children is dead. She is the parent left. The one job she has above every cause, every protest, every headline, is getting home to her kids.
And what is she doing instead?
She’s in the street, in her car, blocking federal agents who are doing their job. Not alone! Her partner is right there filming her like this is some brave little documentary moment. Around them: whistles blaring, people yelling, pure chaos, manufactured chaos, so agents can’t do their lawful duty.
Her window is down.
She hears the orders.
She understands the orders.
She ignores the orders.
Then she puts the car in reverse.
Still doesn’t comply.
Then she puts it in drive, NOT park! She moves forward into the agent.
That’s not “confusion.”
That’s not “panic.”
That’s decision after decision after decision.
Now put yourself in the agent’s shoes for half a second. A driver is already in an unlawful act! refusing commands in a hostile, chaotic scene, and now that driver uses a vehicle to move toward you.
You get a split second.
You don’t get the luxury of “Maybe she’s just stressed.”
You have to assume the worst, you have to think of protecting other people like the partner at their window, because if you assume the best and you’re wrong, you don’t go home or someone else.
So the agent fires after she makes an intentional and aggressive move toward him, because he has no idea what her intentions are, and she just demonstrated she’s willing to escalate.
Now… imagine her three kids.
At school.
Sitting there like any other day.
Not knowing their mother is out playing street-hero games for criminals in the middle of a work week, with the two adults responsible for them!
She didn’t think about them.
She didn’t think, “If I get arrested, who picks my babies up?”
She didn’t think, “If I get hurt, who raises them?”
She didn’t think, “If I die, they have nobody.”
She thought about protecting criminals.
She thought about interfering with federal agents.
She thought about the camera.
She thought about the crowd.
She thought about the moment.
There is no amount of evidence, money, tears on TV, or news spin that can make this make sense.
As a parent: NOTHING about this makes sense.
At minimum, she knew her actions could get her arrested.
At minimum.
And she still chose it.
She chose strangers.
She chose chaos.
She chose lawlessness.
Make it make sense, because the only thing I see is three kids who just got abandoned by the only parent they had left, not by accident… but by a series of deliberate choices.
Stop defending this.
Three kids. Middle of a work week.
The father of those children is dead. She is the parent left. The one job she has above every cause, every protest, every headline, is getting home to her kids.
And what is she doing instead?
She’s in the street, in her car, blocking federal agents who are doing their job. Not alone! Her partner is right there filming her like this is some brave little documentary moment. Around them: whistles blaring, people yelling, pure chaos, manufactured chaos, so agents can’t do their lawful duty.
Her window is down.
She hears the orders.
She understands the orders.
She ignores the orders.
Then she puts the car in reverse.
Still doesn’t comply.
Then she puts it in drive, NOT park! She moves forward into the agent.
That’s not “confusion.”
That’s not “panic.”
That’s decision after decision after decision.
Now put yourself in the agent’s shoes for half a second. A driver is already in an unlawful act! refusing commands in a hostile, chaotic scene, and now that driver uses a vehicle to move toward you.
You get a split second.
You don’t get the luxury of “Maybe she’s just stressed.”
You have to assume the worst, you have to think of protecting other people like the partner at their window, because if you assume the best and you’re wrong, you don’t go home or someone else.
So the agent fires after she makes an intentional and aggressive move toward him, because he has no idea what her intentions are, and she just demonstrated she’s willing to escalate.
Now… imagine her three kids.
At school.
Sitting there like any other day.
Not knowing their mother is out playing street-hero games for criminals in the middle of a work week, with the two adults responsible for them!
She didn’t think about them.
She didn’t think, “If I get arrested, who picks my babies up?”
She didn’t think, “If I get hurt, who raises them?”
She didn’t think, “If I die, they have nobody.”
She thought about protecting criminals.
She thought about interfering with federal agents.
She thought about the camera.
She thought about the crowd.
She thought about the moment.
There is no amount of evidence, money, tears on TV, or news spin that can make this make sense.
As a parent: NOTHING about this makes sense.
At minimum, she knew her actions could get her arrested.
At minimum.
And she still chose it.
She chose strangers.
She chose chaos.
She chose lawlessness.
Make it make sense, because the only thing I see is three kids who just got abandoned by the only parent they had left, not by accident… but by a series of deliberate choices.
Stop defending this.
Anyone get a shocked face reading this? Thought so.
Indivisible Twin Cities, which describes itself as a grassroots group of volunteers, has led many of the protests against ICE raids in Minnesota, where Renee Nicole Good was shot dead Wednesday after allegedly trying to mow down an ICE agent with her vehicle.
Indivisible is an offshoot of the Indivisible Project in Washington, DC, which bills itself as a movement to defeat the “Trump agenda,” and received $7,850,000 from Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023, according to public records.
The controversial group was also behind recent pro-Venezuela protests and “No Kings” demonstrations against the Trump administration throughout the country last year.
In addition to Indivisible Twin Cities — which does not identify its leaders on its website — other protest leaders include the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an anti-Israel group whose Minnesota chapter’s executive director Jaylani Hussein has rallied against ICE at protests.
“A young observer killed in the line of observing, we believe in a peaceful manner. They are lying, as you hear today. They already shared lies about what took place,” Hussein said, speaking into a megaphone at an anti-ICE demonstration Wednesday.
Good, a sometime poet, has been described by leftist sources as a “legal observer” during the residential ICE action where she died.
Good, who moved from Colorado to Minnesota last year, was an anti-ICE “warrior” and a member of “ICE Watch,” a coalition of activists dedicated to disrupting ICE raids in Minneapolis, The Post recently revealed
Nekima Levy Armstrong, the founder of the Racial Justice Network, has also been a leader of the demonstrations.
The Minnesota attorney and civil rights activist is one of the people helping organize the so-called “legal observers” who show up at raids throughout the city to document the federal agents’ activities, according to social media posts.
She also posts information about vigils and demonstrations on her social media accounts. Armstrong played a prominent role during the protests after George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis in May 2020, according to reports.
When embattled Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz announced that he would not be seeking re-election amid a sprawling welfare fraud in the state earlier this week, Armstrong criticized his move as a “retreat.”
“When Democrats respond to bad-faith attacks by retreating, they don’t just lose candidates,” Armstrong said in a Facebook post.
“They legitimize the tactic. They teach voters that propaganda works, that cruelty carries no cost, and that marginalized communities can be used as political weapons without consequence. Whatever the intentions, the cumulative effect is strategic capitulation.”
Other protest leaders include Edwin Torres DeSantiago, who heads up the Immigrant Defense Network, which describes itself as an umbrella group for more than 90 nonprofits and religious groups working to protect the rights of immigrants.
Born in El Salvador, DeSantiago is the first undocumented immigrant to pursue a doctorate at the University of Minnesota.
Following Good’s death, DeSantiago accused President Trump of sowing “terror and chaos” in Minneapolis.
Here’s who’s really behind the Minneapolis ICE resistance movement
Radical leftist groups, including one financed with $7.8 million from progressive billionaire George Soros, are behind the anti-ICE protests in Minnesota, The Post has learned.Indivisible Twin Cities, which describes itself as a grassroots group of volunteers, has led many of the protests against ICE raids in Minnesota, where Renee Nicole Good was shot dead Wednesday after allegedly trying to mow down an ICE agent with her vehicle.
Indivisible is an offshoot of the Indivisible Project in Washington, DC, which bills itself as a movement to defeat the “Trump agenda,” and received $7,850,000 from Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023, according to public records.
The controversial group was also behind recent pro-Venezuela protests and “No Kings” demonstrations against the Trump administration throughout the country last year.
In addition to Indivisible Twin Cities — which does not identify its leaders on its website — other protest leaders include the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an anti-Israel group whose Minnesota chapter’s executive director Jaylani Hussein has rallied against ICE at protests.
“A young observer killed in the line of observing, we believe in a peaceful manner. They are lying, as you hear today. They already shared lies about what took place,” Hussein said, speaking into a megaphone at an anti-ICE demonstration Wednesday.
Good, a sometime poet, has been described by leftist sources as a “legal observer” during the residential ICE action where she died.
Good, who moved from Colorado to Minnesota last year, was an anti-ICE “warrior” and a member of “ICE Watch,” a coalition of activists dedicated to disrupting ICE raids in Minneapolis, The Post recently revealed
Nekima Levy Armstrong, the founder of the Racial Justice Network, has also been a leader of the demonstrations.
The Minnesota attorney and civil rights activist is one of the people helping organize the so-called “legal observers” who show up at raids throughout the city to document the federal agents’ activities, according to social media posts.
She also posts information about vigils and demonstrations on her social media accounts. Armstrong played a prominent role during the protests after George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis in May 2020, according to reports.
When embattled Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz announced that he would not be seeking re-election amid a sprawling welfare fraud in the state earlier this week, Armstrong criticized his move as a “retreat.”
“When Democrats respond to bad-faith attacks by retreating, they don’t just lose candidates,” Armstrong said in a Facebook post.
“They legitimize the tactic. They teach voters that propaganda works, that cruelty carries no cost, and that marginalized communities can be used as political weapons without consequence. Whatever the intentions, the cumulative effect is strategic capitulation.”
Other protest leaders include Edwin Torres DeSantiago, who heads up the Immigrant Defense Network, which describes itself as an umbrella group for more than 90 nonprofits and religious groups working to protect the rights of immigrants.
Born in El Salvador, DeSantiago is the first undocumented immigrant to pursue a doctorate at the University of Minnesota.
Following Good’s death, DeSantiago accused President Trump of sowing “terror and chaos” in Minneapolis.
Her diagnosis reminds me also of the AWFULS: Affluent White Female Urban Liberals
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,799
- Reaction score
- 6,663
- Points
- 113
How does the shooting of Ashlee Babbit not fall under stand your ground laws?
What don’t you understand about “it has nothing to do with what or how many laws were being broken”?
You’re making up your own reality much like Trump and Noem.
The ICE agents life wasn’t in danger when he fired the first, second or third shot. He was clearly beside the car. The guy who shot Ashlee Babbit had no way of knowing if she had a weapon on her or not.
