Yes you are.
You are missing the "Well if he had just listened to the police" and not all "cops are bad" and the "they don't protest criminals" and the general don't give a **** attitude about police brutality/accountability/corruption. Keep in mind this was not the only scandal CPD is involved in. This murder and subsequent cover up attempt is in addition to the Chicago Police Department running a secret detention/torture facility. That points to a systemic problem throughout the CPD that we all ought to be outraged over. As a conservative I care bout the rule of law as much as I care about law and order. Most of you guys seen to be content to trade your rights away for some temporary security. Y'all need to remember the favor of the government is fleeting. A long time ago a wise old man said something about trading liberty for safety.
DON'T BE A BOOT LICKER.
I guess I don't see where people are saying what you think they are saying. The vast majority has said they don't agree with what the cop did. They ALSO mention that if the cops tell you to get out of the street, get out of the ******* street.
Do you think
this cop would have shot
this guy if he had gotten out of the street? I think it unlikely, which is all anyone is saying. No one is using it as justification for the shooting (or I don't interpret it as such). Based upon what little I've seen/read, it was, probably, only a matter of time before this cop shot or otherwise injured someone.
How many of them are saying it is OK for the cop to shoot you if you don't. Especially, in the back or 16 times? Who are they?
How many people here are saying what this cop did was OK? Who are they?
I also don't see how getting out of the street when the cop tells me to as giving up any rights.
How many of us here are saying "give up your rights if a cop tells you to do so"? Who are they and what rights are they OK giving up?
How many of us are saying the cops don't have to follow the law and who are they?
I'm not missing the "not all cops are bad", I just don't interpret someone saying that the same way you do, I guess. This seems to have been a bad cop who did a bad thing. I don't know how saying "not all cops are bad" changes that in any way? Are any of us saying this was a good cop? Anyone saying he didn't use excessive force?
If a cop approaches me, I don't assume he is a bad cop. I assume he is one of the good cops, with the wariness that I could be wrong.
The fact is, if anyone is going to protest, it should be because of an unjustified shooting and not based upon the race of the people involved (unless there is some actual proof that THIS officer acted in such a way due to racial views). This should be protested that those in charge covered it up and, seemingly, conspired to destroy evidence. I'd imagine that wasn't done on racial bias, but, who knows.
Several people should be fired, just for the cover up, as it had to involve several people. I see where the Police Chief already resigned. How can that be enough?