• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Charlie Kirk shot from a distance, direct hit

Maybe you should google the first amendment and read the first five words: "Congress shall make no law...". Nothing in the first amendment prevents a business making decisions to protect their commercial interests or people criticising him for his comments. It never ceases to amaze me how many Americans invoke the first amendment without knowing those important five words.
Which part of the first amendment discusses the government being able to pressure companies to suspend employees?
 
Which part of the first amendment discusses the government being able to pressure companies to suspend employees?
You mean like when health care employees were fired for commenting about the Covid shots?

All those doctors and nurses didn't have sinking ratings on a talk show that mostly featured lefty sympathizers. They had families and dependents.

They were directly silenced by government edict when Biden/pFauci et al. suspended the 1st Amendment, informed consent and my body, my choice to frighten and divide the world.

ABC got rid of an underperforming employee who refused his boss's request to modify his behavior.
 
Just STOP with your ridiculous false equivalencies.



Comparing the Hortman murders to Charlie Kirk's assassination is the absolute shining star example of a FALSE equivalency. Yet, of course, you use it.

What's even worse is your LAME, baseless attempt to drawn any equivalency between Trump making a stadium full of people laugh saying he "hates his opponents" and EVERY Leftist media organization/reporter and the loudest of Dem pols calling Trump and the ENTIRE Right NAZIS and HITLER for more than a decade.

If it wasn't so sick, your compare would be funny. But it's not.

Your side's language is an excuse for violence, and an inferred suggestion (sometimes very direct) toward violence.

You lose again, this time woefully.

Now, care to tell us your thoughts on Charlie Kirk's assassination? Can we look at your Twitter feed?
 

Comparing the Hortman murders to Charlie Kirk's assassination is the absolute shining star example of a FALSE equivalency. Yet, of course, you use it.

What's even worse is your LAME, baseless attempt to drawn any equivalency between Trump making a stadium full of people laugh saying he "hates his opponents" and EVERY Leftist media organization/reporter and the loudest of Dem pols calling Trump and the ENTIRE Right NAZIS and HITLER for more than a decade.

If it wasn't so sick, your compare would be funny. But it's not.

Your side's language is an excuse for violence, and an inferred suggestion (sometimes very direct) toward violence.

You lose again, this time woefully.

Now, care to tell us your thoughts on Charlie Kirk's assassination? Can we look at your Twitter feed?
Never been on Twitter.

So you can explain why Dear Leader is right and Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson are wrong? This should be good…
 


Never been on Twitter.

So you can explain why Dear Leader is right and Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson are wrong? This should be good…


The **** is that nonsensical, not funny SOCIAL MEDIA post (remember, you HATE social media posts).

Second...I have no idea what you're referring to re: Cruz/Tucker.

Regardless, you're not playing your bullshit with me and change the argument.

You've tried to equate murders to political assassinations and failed miserably.
You've tried to equate snippets from some to a decade of non-stop political hate speech inciting violence and failed miserably.
You've yet to even give us your thoughts on Charlie's assassination (not that any of us are surprised).

So we are going to stick to this topic until you stop evading it.

What are your thoughts on Charlie Kirk being assassinated in front of his wife and children by a radical, trans-loving Leftist?
 
Comparing the Hortman murders to Charlie Kirk's assassination is the absolute shining star example of a FALSE equivalency. Yet, of course, you use it.
Why, because she was an elected representative and Kirk was merely a talking head?
 
Remember when Trump tried to sue Bill Mahrer because he had proof he wasn’t a descendant of an orangutan? Did that make sense to you?

What are your thoughts on Charlie Kirk being assassinated in front of his wife and children by a radical, trans-loving Leftist?
 
Why, because she was an elected representative and Kirk was merely a talking head?

This has been explained to you. Go back, read, absorb.

She was murdered for as yet unidentified personal reasons, NOT because of a decade long chorus of targeted, violent hate speech that's led to Trump nearly being killed twice and Charlie's murder.

What are your thoughts on Charlie Kirk being assassinated in front of his wife and children by a radical, trans-loving Leftist?
 
"Hello Bob? Hey, it's Barack here, listen Michelle and I were just talking, and we'd like you to can Rosanne over that Twitter thing.
As soon as possible if you don't mind, we need to fuel the fire on social media. Thanks, Bob."
 
Which part of the first amendment discusses the government being able to pressure companies to suspend employees?
So, the government also pressured the suspensions and firings of Bill Maher, Gina Carano, and Rosanne Barr?
The Networks themselves didn't come to this conclusion themselves from viewer letters/emails/calls/etc.?
It took governmental officials to pressure them into these decisions?
 
You mean like when health care employees were fired for commenting about the Covid shots?

All those doctors and nurses didn't have sinking ratings on a talk show that mostly featured lefty sympathizers. They had families and dependents.

They were directly silenced by government edict when Biden/pFauci et al. suspended the 1st Amendment, informed consent and my body, my choice to frighten and divide the world.

ABC got rid of an underperforming employee who refused his boss's request to modify his behavior.
It's almost as if someone forgot about their arguments in the COVID thread about how jobs are not a right and that it was the individual's own fault for being fired for refusing to take a vaccine. But no blame should fall on the company itself for the mandates they implemented.

For those scoring at home :
My body/my choice but ONLY when talking about abortion.
Employers can fire you for refusing the COVID vaccine but not for making comments that go against the image the network is trying to maintain ( unless of course you identify as not a Democrat/Liberal ).
 
Comparing the Hortman murders to Charlie Kirk's assassination is the absolute shining star example of a FALSE equivalency. Yet, of course, you use it.

Now, care to tell us your thoughts on Charlie Kirk's assassination? Can we look at your Twitter feed?
Oh Flog.


1758561395110.png
 
"Hello Bob? Hey, it's Barack here, listen Michelle and I were just talking, and we'd like you to can Rosanne over that Twitter thing.
As soon as possible if you don't mind, we need to fuel the fire on social media. Thanks, Bob."

Floggy: "Fake news, JFC!!"
 
Which part of the first amendment discusses the government being able to pressure companies to suspend employees?
I actually agree with you on this point. The FCC chairs comments were out of line. But it was no more reprehensible than what what was systemic under Biden and hidden from public view. At least he had the guts to make his asinine statement public. Biden handlers were teaming up in collusion with the media and social media to silence dissenters. That scares me a whole lot more than bluster from the chairman. Kimmel should be called out for his lies but what to do about him should be entirely left to his bosses without pressure from the government.
 
Does this guy make sense?

 
You're right. Murder has always been part of the human experience. But the mass murder of children in traditionally safe and secure places is a pretty new thing.
and yet here you, and Flog, are cheering on a school shooter.
 
I actually agree with you on this point. The FCC chairs comments were out of line. But it was no more reprehensible than what what was systemic under Biden and hidden from public view. At least he had the guts to make his asinine statement public. Biden handlers were teaming up in collusion with the media and social media to silence dissenters. That scares me a whole lot more than bluster from the chairman. Kimmel should be called out for his lies but what to do about him should be entirely left to his bosses without pressure from the government.
I agree with you, but that ship has long since sailed.

If an assassination can be justified over an opinion, there is no going back.
Rational thought and discourse have gone the way of the Edsel.

As far as Kimmel goes, that decision should be up to his employer and dictated by the bottom line, as it should in any business operating in the free market system.
 
Just STOP with your ridiculous false equivalencies.


so, if a mf takes a shot at you, and just nicks your ear, you'd turn the other cheek?

and if another mf tries to set up to put a round into you while you're golfing, you'd again turn the other cheek?

and if a mf tries suing you into bankruptcy over something they do themselves, you'd again turn the other cheek?

and if a mf literally changes the law to sue you over some insane bullshit, you'd again turn the other cheek?

and if a mf coordianates the undermining of your legitimacy as POTUS, you'd turn the other cheek?

yet you condemn a mf who only spoke to people.

i bet you're a wnba fan.
 
Top