• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Charlie Kirk shot from a distance, direct hit

I don't believe we know the truth.

Here's what keeps me grounded on the theory that Robinson in fact did it....

He or someone looking just like him is caught on the roof, marching to the university, climbing stairs, etc. He was in fact there.

How would you get a patsy to sign up to be Robinson, if he didn't do it...was just a decoy? How would you find someone willing to suffer through prison, trials, then the death penalty? Robinson would have had to sign up for this in some way, to be a decoy. To go to the campus, to the roof, knowing he's being set up (you would think).

Seem unlikely you'd find a volunteer for that. Could he have been 'duped' into it? I don't know how, but anything is possible.
disassembled the rifle
climbed down, leaving the screwdriver behind that he used to disassemble the rifle.
reassembled the rifle
ran and hid the reassembled rifle, wrapped in a towel

how did he reassemble the rifle when he left the screwdriver on the roof?

there are questions to be answered
 
You act as if this wouldn't be possible.

Have you read about what the Israelis did with cell phones and pagers? Fully functioning devices that were simultaneously bombs.

The above can indeed be built.

Not saying I believe it, but to deny it outright when we've seen even greater innovation is naive.
I'm not flat out denying it, but it is just not likely. Having bombs in pagers is different than trying to remotely shoot a bullet from a mic into someone's neck while the victim is holding / moving the mic.
 
shifting gears on this...

what do y'all think of the conspiracy theories surfacing now? particularly the one where the microphone had a bullet in it. there's reels going around where you can see the microphone jump (its pinned just above his right pec) and then blood come from the left side of his neck, like an exit wound. in that reel, it's slowed down so you can see that someone who jumped behind the table picked up said microphone and handed it to someone else, who then disappeared into the crowd.

this, fellas, is our JFK and MLK rolled into one.

For what it's worth, he talks about the "microphone" in his first theory assessment.

 
disassembled the rifle
climbed down, leaving the screwdriver behind that he used to disassemble the rifle.
reassembled the rifle
ran and hid the reassembled rifle, wrapped in a towel

how did he reassemble the rifle when he left the screwdriver on the roof?

there are questions to be answered

Tons of inconsistencies that do not make sense, agreed. Even the text messages. He had to have been smart enough to know anything he texted and posted online WOULD be found.
 
I'm not flat out denying it, but it is just not likely. Having bombs in pagers is different than trying to remotely shoot a bullet from a mic into someone's neck while the victim is holding / moving the mic.

Watch the video I just posted. The theory is the hidden mic under his shirt exploded. YouTube won't charge you $50 to watch it. It's free.
 
For what it's worth, he talks about the "microphone" in his first theory assessment.


what's interesting to me is they almost immediately identified this as a 30.06 round.

I'm not a hunter, but do go to the range. I've shot a 30.06 once. But that was at a paper target. So I'm relying on the experience of others who have shot this round to tell how the impact could have damaged the neck in such a manner. And I've been wondering where the bullet went after it went through his neck. I've seen where the doctor said the bullet was stopped by his bone structure, but I find that very difficult to believe.

as far as the microphone - would a smaller caliber bullet do such damage at close range? say a .22LR?
 
what's interesting to me is they almost immediately identified this as a 30.06 round.

I'm not a hunter, but do go to the range. I've shot a 30.06 once. But that was at a paper target. So I'm relying on the experience of others who have shot this round to tell how the impact could have damaged the neck in such a manner. And I've been wondering where the bullet went after it went through his neck. I've seen where the doctor said the bullet was stopped by his bone structure, but I find that very difficult to believe.

as far as the microphone - would a smaller caliber bullet do such damage at close range? say a .22LR?
My primary hunting rifle for years was a 30-06. I used to use 180 grain, but dropped down to 150 grain. Just more consistent ballistics over distance.

On a general note, the exit hole is a lot more significant than the impact hole. That changes with impacting a bone, metal, if the round hits anything significant on the way, etc. I don't believe it hit anything but Charlie. I am hearing that it went in the neck and came out near the right temple. That means it hit a bone on a glance, as I don't think it hit any jewelry of significance on the way.

I know that there are 30-06 rounds that go smaller - 120 grains or less even. Those will behave is such a way that they are more susceptible to deflection. I can't find anything on the grain of the round.

The microphone theory is too far fetched for me to get behind.
 
Watch the video I just posted. The theory is the hidden mic under his shirt exploded. YouTube won't charge you $50 to watch it. It's free.
Have you seen the comparisons to the 1998 Movie Snake Eyes with Nicolas Cage?

In the film, a Senator named "Charles Kirkland" is assassinated at a boxing match with the fighter named The Atlantic City Executioner Tyler who takes a fall as a distraction while Kirkland is shot in the throat. They even have the random weird guy in the crowd cheering the event. In fact, the fight takes place on September 10th against the backdrop of Hurricane Jezebel (the Jezebel story about curses uttered toward Charlie Kirk).

I'm thinking Predictive Programming and the movie as the blueprint here for what went down psyop or not.

 
Last edited:

This one is interesting, but still a few questions. What is being showed as the entry wound i think is his necklace flying up as seen in the first video. It is not conclusive that is blood. Second there was a backdrop behind Charlie plus the tent so I'm not sure the "bush" would have had a clear view. I have also have had injuries where the wound doesn't show up for a second or two. One time I sliced my hand on broken ceramic tile and I told my assistant "this is going to be bad" before the blood started coming out. The most interesting part in your video is that it does look like you can see the skin of the neck stretching out before the wound appears. I think the mic theory is debunked for many reasons. Most importantly his shirt should have been shredded or at least discolored from the discharge
 
what's interesting to me is they almost immediately identified this as a 30.06 round.

I'm not a hunter, but do go to the range. I've shot a 30.06 once. But that was at a paper target. So I'm relying on the experience of others who have shot this round to tell how the impact could have damaged the neck in such a manner. And I've been wondering where the bullet went after it went through his neck. I've seen where the doctor said the bullet was stopped by his bone structure, but I find that very difficult to believe.

as far as the microphone - would a smaller caliber bullet do such damage at close range? say a .22LR?

I've killed a deer (long long ago as a youth) with a .22 long. No way that round is blowing a hole that large in the side of his neck. My view.

Some information below. The .22 is known to bounce off bones, causing severe internal damage if it does. So maybe, if it was a .22 or .22long it hit the spine, splintered and blew out the neck but I find that highly doubtful.

1759288231707.png

1759288403884.png
 
Agreed. I mentioned that above in response to Jitter.
The video you posted was the guy basically debunking the mic theory, ear piece theory, and raising doubts about the 2nd shooter theory. It's pretty clear Charlie was not wearing an earpiece and he makes it very convincing there was no hidden explosive. The other theory was the bullet had to come from a different angle was inconclusive at best. This theory could be correct if Kirk was sitting perfectly straight forward and looking straight ahead. If Charlies head / body/ chair was turned even just a couple degrees it would debunk this theory. The second video that was posted gave a much better argument for the bullet coming from behind and was definitely interesting
 
Interestingly, and probably completely unrelated, but the US backed Qatar, long seen as bankers/backers/funders of anti-Israeli actions globally, was bombed a couple days ahead of Charlie Kirk's assassination, with Israel only informing POTUS as the bombs "were in air". This just after the US sent a Gaza peace proposal to Israel and Hamas. Then Kirk gets "hit", with the ensuing and embarrassing shitshow "investigation".
Fast forward to now, with the US authoring another proposal AND guaranteeing Qatar NATO like safety from Israeli attack.
Hmmmmmm
 
dont forget what mossad did with a shipment of pagers.
And how long it was planned...

Look up the Hebrew meaning of the word "Orem" (Utah). Symbolism always leaves clues.
 
Watch the video I just posted. The theory is the hidden mic under his shirt exploded. YouTube won't charge you $50 to watch it. It's free.

"Oh, I'm not worried about a $50 because when I check my bank balance, I keep seeing an extra $50 for some reas ... uhhh, never mind. Yeah, I need to save $50."
- jizzer$50
 
I didn't say it did,but ALL evidence points to him.
just like Oswald. lol

How did this kid get off the roof with the gun, as on film -- in under a minute -- including dissembling a gun that takes trained experts several minutes, changing clothes and 80 yard run and descent?

Why would he re-aasemble it, only to hide it in a towel in the woods? And then text like a 58 yr old cat lady with perfect grammar to his "furry love", who also texts with perfect English?
 
just like Oswald. lol

How did this kid get off the roof with the gun, as on film -- in under a minute -- including dissembling a gun that takes trained experts several minutes, changing clothes and 80 yard run and descent?

Why would he re-aasemble it, only to hide it in a towel in the woods? And then text like a 58 yr old cat lady with perfect grammar to his "furry love", who also texts with perfect English?

He isn't the only person involved. That's perfectly clear.
 
Top