- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 706
- Reaction score
- 462
- Points
- 63
Heyward definitely could be an adequate (if not dominant 4-3 DE), he has played DE and 5 tech at OSU and he could be our best pass rusher (presently) on the roster.
I would compare him to Carlos Dunlap w the Bengals (LDE). Hell, Heyward nearly had as many sacks/pressures as Dunlap while playing inside. While I caught some flack for making direct comparisons to the Bengals 4-3 as an example of how our players would fit (Bengals have had a pretty good D, Ranked 5th last year, New DC this year and lack of production from Adkins/Gilberry hurt them this year), My ideal 4-3 set would line up Heyward, McClendon/McCullers, Tuitt/McCullers and Brandon Graham (or someone like him) at RDE when lined up in the 4-3 front. It would make it an easy switch personnel-wise to switch back to a 3-4 which I would run with Jarvis-LOLB, Heyward-LDE, McClendon/McCullers-NT, Tuitt/Vet-RDE and Graham at ROLB.
I don't know IF we can get Graham now that he's proven he can be productive in either a 4-3 or 3-4 and I heard Philly is now trying to re-sign him after considering him a 4-3 "only" kind of guy only to be surprised at how well he did this year at 3-4 when Cole went down.
To me, this would be the ideal situation IF we are running a hybrid 3-4/4-3 defense. Also, Jarvis might fare better against a RT who are less "technically sound" than a LT by playing LOLB in our base. It doesn't put as much pressure on him to produce either.
I would compare him to Carlos Dunlap w the Bengals (LDE). Hell, Heyward nearly had as many sacks/pressures as Dunlap while playing inside. While I caught some flack for making direct comparisons to the Bengals 4-3 as an example of how our players would fit (Bengals have had a pretty good D, Ranked 5th last year, New DC this year and lack of production from Adkins/Gilberry hurt them this year), My ideal 4-3 set would line up Heyward, McClendon/McCullers, Tuitt/McCullers and Brandon Graham (or someone like him) at RDE when lined up in the 4-3 front. It would make it an easy switch personnel-wise to switch back to a 3-4 which I would run with Jarvis-LOLB, Heyward-LDE, McClendon/McCullers-NT, Tuitt/Vet-RDE and Graham at ROLB.
I don't know IF we can get Graham now that he's proven he can be productive in either a 4-3 or 3-4 and I heard Philly is now trying to re-sign him after considering him a 4-3 "only" kind of guy only to be surprised at how well he did this year at 3-4 when Cole went down.
To me, this would be the ideal situation IF we are running a hybrid 3-4/4-3 defense. Also, Jarvis might fare better against a RT who are less "technically sound" than a LT by playing LOLB in our base. It doesn't put as much pressure on him to produce either.