- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Messages
- 15,544
- Reaction score
- 3,801
- Points
- 113
Earlier in the thread you advanced the argument that you cannot judge Burns in a vacuum, you have to judge him by comparing him to other DBs in the draft. Does this same thought process apply to the Steelers FO?.
Driver,
I will offer a compare and contrast to another corner. Just send me the link for a snap count.
As for the front office thought process, I think they reached because the problem hit a point of no return. Otherwise they accept the offer to trade down. Football Focus said square peg into round hole
25. Pittsburgh Steelers: Artie Burns | Grade: D
In a mismatch of skillsets and scheme, the Steelers take Burns with the hope that they can develop his 6-foot plus frame into a dependable player. The problem here, much like the Apple pick to the Giants, is that the Steelers played more zone coverage than any team in the league last year and that’s where Burns has his struggles. His +2.8 coverage grade ranked 42nd in the draft class, and though he does show skills as a man coverage cornerback, but his overall game remains raw. If Pittsburgh plans on altering their scheme to play more man coverage, this pick makes more sense, but at this point, it’s an example of a cornerback’s size and speed moving him up a draft board at the expense of his on-field play. - Pro football focus
https://www.profootballfocus.com/draft-round-by-round-ranking-of-2016s-best-nfl-cb-prospects/