Sure. You could move Cole over true. Just not sure Cole is a big enough needed upgrade compared to LG and LT. And if a C is drafted are they still upgrading WR,NT, backup OLBer/ILBer/CB/LT?
Moore was a project with upside the day he was drafted. The Steelers needed a bridge LT and to have Moore on the bench year 1, 6th OL for short yardage in year 2 before taking over as starter in year 3. FWIW, PFF has Moore 59/80, Dotson 33/86, Cole 15/38, Daniels 24/86, and Okorafor 58/80.
Meh....we easily could bring in a few FAs and fix some issues. We do need to address the trenches though.
what do those numbers mean?
Whoa! John Jackson? Let's put his *** on the bench and hope he develops into a Marvel Smith, Oliver Ross, Kelvin Beachum or Max Starks first. Right now he is Jamaine Stephens lumbering out on the field. Seriously, Jackson was 6'6, 310 lbs and a man among men in his time. Big, strong, and athletic as hell. Moore is a slow lard-*** compared to him.
That is what Jackson became. Try to remember his first number of years. He was pretty average. He was a late round pick out of Kentucky and took a little time to develop. I see some similarities. What I like about Moore is he was thrown into a difficult situation and has hung in there. The lousy OC and play calling haven't exactly helped. One thing that perplexes me about some of you is how you will say the coaching is so bad and then judge the players. Shouldn't some of the judgement be withheld until the coaching improves? In John Jackson's case, Noll retired and Joe Walton went out the door with him. Cowher and Earhardt come in and 7-9 players became 11-5 players.
Moore is still a better LT in year 2 than Chuks was in year 4. Chuks could never figure out he needed to keep his arms extended even though they taught it to him every year. So, there is that. He's still an improvement over Chuks.
I'm all for adding talent. The OL needs it badly. I just think Moore may end up being a good player at LT. You also have no idea if a guy who has played nothing but tackle can be a guard. If you think Moore is so bad at LT what makes you project him as a good guard? And lastly, if the coaching is so damn bad, which we all agree on, how can we accurately judge the players? I also believe you get an OC that knows what the heck he is doing in there, the line will look a lot better.
The projections at Guard is because he struggles with speed to the outside, his kick is slow and puts him at a bad situation. Probably in a phone booth he would do a lot better without having to worry with chasing rushers
So did John Jackson. A lot of LTs struggle with the speed and athleticism of pass rushers. So Earhardt handled that issue by a willingness to run the ball on 3 and 8, for example, specifically a draw play. That's what good OCs do. I still remember Bruce Smith a number of times sailing right on by as Jackson just gave him a little shove around, as Foster or Hoge or Bettis would run right up through the hole created. That'll slow down a pass rush in a hurry.
You could also prove this by looking back at who was here before during and after Munchak left. Once Munch got here the Line improved immediately. It also declined immediately after he left (and not cause we lost a lot of players between that time). Pretty much a proven hypothesis here.
I'm not sure if he's played G so it will be interesting to see how that plays out. He really can't be any worse than Dotson or Green, can he?
Good comparison diver...
Probably.
I thought of that. Is it just the jersey number? But I am old enough to remember Jackson struggling some early, but really becoming a player once Cowher came in with Ron Earhardt. 
Probably.
Maybe. Unless they are pretty confident they know what is coming. Multiple opponents have stated they knew what the Steelers were going to run. If you are pretty confident in what's coming, your get off is gonna be a lot quicker.