- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Messages
- 15,544
- Reaction score
- 3,801
- Points
- 113
They say it takes 3 years to grade a draft. A look back at the 2016 draft
Round one CB Burns.
Now a backup, the Steelers blew this pick. They had a chance to trade down and pick up a 3rd, and a chance to select pro bowl corner X. Howard, a player thought would be a good one. Burns loses focus, and seems lost in zone coverage. At this point its safe to say Burns was a bad first round pick.
Round 2 Saftey Davis. Davis is still our starter, but his play has been very uneven. Davis has lead the team in miss tackles in 2018 and makes few plays on the ball. Few plays on the ball with our pass rush highlights his lack of ball skills. 3rd party rating systems in terms of football magazines or online sources such as PFF do not view him favorably. He is injured to start the season. The Steelers could have taken Saftey Kevin Byard a few picks later. He's only an All Pro.
Round 3 Nose Tackle / Defensive Tackle Hargrave.
Hargave has shown his value as a pass rusher later. He's average in my book vs. the run, and plays less than 50% of the snaps these days, partially to the coaches dumfounding 2 defensive lineman format. Still, he is a good third-round pick and has a relatively low cap number. What the Steelers decide to do with him in the offseason will be interesting.
Round 4 Offensive tackle Hawkins.
A pick I didn't like, he was shaky when healthy in the pre-season and hurt too often. He's cut now. Quite a few starting offensive linemen were taken after Hawkins.
Round 6. Outside linebacker Feeney.
A speedy and undersized linebacker who never panned out.
Round 7 Wide Receiver Ayers.
Small and slow, the Steelers let him go in 2017.
Round 7 Inside linebacker Matakevich.
An overachiever who adds value to special teams and always plays hard. A solid 7th round pick.
Draft grade C- The more time that passes, the worse this draft becomes. Our best pick was likely Hargrave. The Steelers miscalculated with the early picks as history shows there was far better talent on the board. Was the 2015 draft even worse? In my opinion, yes it was by a small margin.
Round one CB Burns.
Now a backup, the Steelers blew this pick. They had a chance to trade down and pick up a 3rd, and a chance to select pro bowl corner X. Howard, a player thought would be a good one. Burns loses focus, and seems lost in zone coverage. At this point its safe to say Burns was a bad first round pick.
Round 2 Saftey Davis. Davis is still our starter, but his play has been very uneven. Davis has lead the team in miss tackles in 2018 and makes few plays on the ball. Few plays on the ball with our pass rush highlights his lack of ball skills. 3rd party rating systems in terms of football magazines or online sources such as PFF do not view him favorably. He is injured to start the season. The Steelers could have taken Saftey Kevin Byard a few picks later. He's only an All Pro.
Round 3 Nose Tackle / Defensive Tackle Hargrave.
Hargave has shown his value as a pass rusher later. He's average in my book vs. the run, and plays less than 50% of the snaps these days, partially to the coaches dumfounding 2 defensive lineman format. Still, he is a good third-round pick and has a relatively low cap number. What the Steelers decide to do with him in the offseason will be interesting.
Round 4 Offensive tackle Hawkins.
A pick I didn't like, he was shaky when healthy in the pre-season and hurt too often. He's cut now. Quite a few starting offensive linemen were taken after Hawkins.
Round 6. Outside linebacker Feeney.
A speedy and undersized linebacker who never panned out.
Round 7 Wide Receiver Ayers.
Small and slow, the Steelers let him go in 2017.
Round 7 Inside linebacker Matakevich.
An overachiever who adds value to special teams and always plays hard. A solid 7th round pick.
Draft grade C- The more time that passes, the worse this draft becomes. Our best pick was likely Hargrave. The Steelers miscalculated with the early picks as history shows there was far better talent on the board. Was the 2015 draft even worse? In my opinion, yes it was by a small margin.
Last edited: