- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 17,519
- Reaction score
- 21,525
- Points
- 113
We've been discussing this in multiple threads and I wanted to get some ideas in one place.
While I would be happy to have Harris or Etienne on the Steelers, I just don't see the value of drafting a running back in the first round.
1. The NFL is a passing league. Yes, the Steelers need to improve their ground game, but they need to do so while keeping in mind that you need to be able to throw the ball. Are either of the top two running backs enough to put the team over the top this year? I personally don't see it so I want to find another way to build to compete this year and into the future.
2. Without an improved offensive line, any first-round running back would be limited. Our running backs don't have great vision and left yards on the table. However, if you watch the line on run plays, the blocking is a mess. Part of it is philosophy--the lack of commitment to the run by the coaching staff. The other part is lack of talent. Pouncey was overpowered in the middle. DeCastro saw a steep drop in his play either due to injury or age. Feiler is better in pass protection than run blocking and the same with Dotson. Chuks is a weak link for the ground game. Factor in the tight ends as well and the Steelers could improve across the board.
3. There is little value in drafting a running back in the first round. Saquon is clearly a great back, but he's injured and the Giants have still been one of the worst teams in the league with him in the backfield. If you look at the top-20 rushing leaders this year you have: 4-1st rounders, 7-2nd rounders, 6-3rd rounders, 1-5th rounder, 2-UDFAs. (I do acknowledge that Saquon and CMC would likely be on this list if they were healthy. Again, two of the top backs in the league are doing little to elevate their teams to the next level). Value is in the 2nd and 3rd rounds and there are some good players who could be very good at the next level including Javonte Williams and Kenneth Gainwell.
4. Part of the reason there's value on Day 2 is because running backs are one-contract players. The average age of the top-20 rushers is 24.1 years old. The oldest on the list are 27 (Henry, Gordon, and Drake). Harris would be 28 at the end of his first contract, Etienne 27. I know this is a fantasy site, but it at least gives some ideas on production and you can see a drop off after age 28: https://apexfantasyleagues.com/2020/02/the-peak-age-for-an-nfl-running-back/. This seems to be supported by NFL teams as this site (https://fftoolbox.fulltimefantasy.com/football/2020/old-running-backs.cfm) identifies 17 running backs 29 or older entering the 2020 NFL season. If you don't want to click the link, it's not an impressive list.
5. The Steelers have one offensive lineman signed beyond 2021. They have a gaping hole at center and assuming Big Al leaves, it's either Chuks, a low-mid tier UFA signing, or a rookie to start at LT. The Steelers won a Super Bowl with maybe the worst line in the NFL, but that's when they had Ben in his prime and one of the best defenses in team history. They don't have either right now. A rebuilt OL will go a long way in protecting either Ben or whoever the new QB is moving forward. It's a 10-year investment. Just about every playoff team had a good offensive line entering the playoffs (of course the Chiefs got decimated with injuries). A strong OL is a way to improve a team for the long term.
6. If not OL, the Steelers could use a number of other positions if good players fall or if they're willing to trade up. QB is a need. Another athlete at ILB isn't a bad option after watching White and David dominate in this playoff run for the Bucs. Depending on what happens with the CBs, a future starter at CB could be a need. There always potential a luxury position could fall and be too good to pass up. It's just if you value these other positions more than finding an upgrade at running back.
Someone sell me why we should draft Harris or Etienne in the first.
While I would be happy to have Harris or Etienne on the Steelers, I just don't see the value of drafting a running back in the first round.
1. The NFL is a passing league. Yes, the Steelers need to improve their ground game, but they need to do so while keeping in mind that you need to be able to throw the ball. Are either of the top two running backs enough to put the team over the top this year? I personally don't see it so I want to find another way to build to compete this year and into the future.
2. Without an improved offensive line, any first-round running back would be limited. Our running backs don't have great vision and left yards on the table. However, if you watch the line on run plays, the blocking is a mess. Part of it is philosophy--the lack of commitment to the run by the coaching staff. The other part is lack of talent. Pouncey was overpowered in the middle. DeCastro saw a steep drop in his play either due to injury or age. Feiler is better in pass protection than run blocking and the same with Dotson. Chuks is a weak link for the ground game. Factor in the tight ends as well and the Steelers could improve across the board.
3. There is little value in drafting a running back in the first round. Saquon is clearly a great back, but he's injured and the Giants have still been one of the worst teams in the league with him in the backfield. If you look at the top-20 rushing leaders this year you have: 4-1st rounders, 7-2nd rounders, 6-3rd rounders, 1-5th rounder, 2-UDFAs. (I do acknowledge that Saquon and CMC would likely be on this list if they were healthy. Again, two of the top backs in the league are doing little to elevate their teams to the next level). Value is in the 2nd and 3rd rounds and there are some good players who could be very good at the next level including Javonte Williams and Kenneth Gainwell.
4. Part of the reason there's value on Day 2 is because running backs are one-contract players. The average age of the top-20 rushers is 24.1 years old. The oldest on the list are 27 (Henry, Gordon, and Drake). Harris would be 28 at the end of his first contract, Etienne 27. I know this is a fantasy site, but it at least gives some ideas on production and you can see a drop off after age 28: https://apexfantasyleagues.com/2020/02/the-peak-age-for-an-nfl-running-back/. This seems to be supported by NFL teams as this site (https://fftoolbox.fulltimefantasy.com/football/2020/old-running-backs.cfm) identifies 17 running backs 29 or older entering the 2020 NFL season. If you don't want to click the link, it's not an impressive list.
5. The Steelers have one offensive lineman signed beyond 2021. They have a gaping hole at center and assuming Big Al leaves, it's either Chuks, a low-mid tier UFA signing, or a rookie to start at LT. The Steelers won a Super Bowl with maybe the worst line in the NFL, but that's when they had Ben in his prime and one of the best defenses in team history. They don't have either right now. A rebuilt OL will go a long way in protecting either Ben or whoever the new QB is moving forward. It's a 10-year investment. Just about every playoff team had a good offensive line entering the playoffs (of course the Chiefs got decimated with injuries). A strong OL is a way to improve a team for the long term.
6. If not OL, the Steelers could use a number of other positions if good players fall or if they're willing to trade up. QB is a need. Another athlete at ILB isn't a bad option after watching White and David dominate in this playoff run for the Bucs. Depending on what happens with the CBs, a future starter at CB could be a need. There always potential a luxury position could fall and be too good to pass up. It's just if you value these other positions more than finding an upgrade at running back.
Someone sell me why we should draft Harris or Etienne in the first.
