Thanks. Let me try for full sack, without any helmet to hemet contact or girding someone into the dirt.
Here's the reason why the league has not figured Jackson out yet, or maybe they know but have not had the right situations.
The Ravens are very good. The play excellent defense and special teams; therefore Lamar Jackson has not had to play from behind and pass it often to win. As much as I dislike him, Harbaugh is a very good NFL coach and has surrounded Jackson with lots of deep speed, which opens up his ability to run the ball vs. man to man type of coverage.
If I'm the DC I take TE Mark Andrews out to the game. I play nickel ( We have a good 4 man pass rush ) with one LB covering Edwards or impeding his first five yards, and the other spying Jackson. If Jakcosn runs, hit him as hard as the rules allow. For us this might mean putting one of our safeties on Andrews if Bush can't do the job, or as a QB Spy ( Edmunds ). Hold Jackson up and make the officials whistle it dead or let the second player clean up on him. Make him Jackson throw it outside the numbers or deeper over the middle.
** I am interested to know what Andrew's production on games the Ravens lost throwing out any late 4th quarter yardage when the other team is playing prevent defense with a 2 score lead. **
So I checked and in the losses the Ravens had, Andrew was not productive all all. This is a good theory see the below link, including their playoff loss.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/gamelog/_/id/3116365/type/nfl/year/2019
We have half 2/3 of the equation with a good 4 man rush; and a man who could spy Jackson ( Bush ) the coverage part is tricky for us.
Either way, Jackson is going to have to bounce back as lots of NFL teams will be studying this game. The smoke could have been blown away from his mirrors.