• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

Obviously reading comprehension isn't a strength - or even a basic skill - you've developed thus far in life. It's never too late to sign up for a remedial course or take a GED test or something.



A clear case of abuse of power. A clear case of high crimes and misdemeanors. A clear case for impeachment.

“My understanding is only coming from people I talk to.” - Ambassador Taylor

Who is it with reading comprehension issue? What the **** does it take to get through to a-holes like you?
 
Last edited:
What the **** does it take to get through to a-holes like you?

I dunno, maybe try using huge, bold font, that always helps get your point across.
 
“My understanding is only coming from people I talk to.” - Ambassador Taylor

Who is it with reading comprehension issue? What the **** does it take to get through to a-holes like you?

Wait a minute. So what you're saying is that Ambassador Taylor has no first hand, direct knowledge? He wasn't a witness? It was all hearsay?

PS...Liberals hear what they want to hear. To them, hearsay is worthy of Salem Witch Trial-type lynchings.
 

I dunno, maybe try using huge, bold font, that always helps get your point across.


A point repeated over and over and not just by me you nimrod...it has come down to scolding the child that you are. Not surprised that the intentions of the bold went over your head as well.

Three years ago..to get rid of Trump by any means necessary. Is it becoming any more clearer to you the motives of the corrupt left?

image.png.58c283252d6a0d21f5b74f13d65b0edf.png
 
Last edited:
Hey Tibs, Had Obama acted in the exact same manner Trump with regards to Ukraine, would you be staunchly in favor of his impeachment?

Answer that.

Would there be "500 law professors" viewing his actions as impeachable?
 
Drag them all in to testify under oath!



Biden blames staff, says nobody ‘warned’ him son’s Ukraine job could raise conflict

Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed in a new interview that when his son Hunter was a board member of Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings while he was in office, no one informed him that it could pose a problem.

Biden insisted again that Hunter did nothing wrong, but this time appeared to fault his staff for not cluing him in that there could be concerns about his son's involvement with the foreign company that had been under investigation while Biden was in office and dealing with Ukraine policy.

"Nobody warned me about a potential conflict of interest. Nobody warned me about that," Biden told NPR

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bi...ned-him-sons-ukraine-job-could-raise-conflict


-----------------------


“Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorance on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon... you know, cause I’ve worked in a lot of offices, and I tell you, people do that all the time.” — George Costanza
 
Drag them all in to testify under oath!



Biden blames staff, says nobody ‘warned’ him son’s Ukraine job could raise conflict

Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed in a new interview that when his son Hunter was a board member of Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings while he was in office, no one informed him that it could pose a problem.

Biden insisted again that Hunter did nothing wrong, but this time appeared to fault his staff for not cluing him in that there could be concerns about his son's involvement with the foreign company that had been under investigation while Biden was in office and dealing with Ukraine policy.

"Nobody warned me about a potential conflict of interest. Nobody warned me about that," Biden told NPR

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bi...ned-him-sons-ukraine-job-could-raise-conflict


-----------------------


“Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorance on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon... you know, cause I’ve worked in a lot of offices, and I tell you, people do that all the time.” — George Costanza

That’s a bullshit cop-out excuse. Sleepy Creepy knew exactly what he was doing when he did pay-for-play with China and Ukraine to get his junkie son money.
 
Hey Tibs, Had Obama acted in the exact same manner Trump with regards to Ukraine, would you be staunchly in favor of his impeachment?

Answer that.

Would there be "500 law professors" viewing his actions as impeachable?

Obama ran guns to the cartels in the Fast and Furious and lied about a youtube video causing a coordinated 9-11 attack that led to the death of an Ambassador in a weapons arsenal complex in Benghazi after illegally toppling the Libyan government.

Obama lied for weeks about the true nature of the attack to stave off the October Surprise effect and to protect his re-election.

People died in both instances.

Trey Gowdy -- a Rubio supporter -- squawked and made a lot of noise but once again the nice guy Republicans failed to hold the Executive Branch accountable for high crimes and dereliction of duty from the anointed First Black President as the country wouldn't survive a bunch of OWG's impeaching him..

The R's are now similarly squirming in the Senate and never want any of this to see the light of day in a Senate trial because people like LG, McCain, and undoubtedly many others are also knee deep in foreign aid corruption along with Creepy Joe and Co.

Like Christine Pelosi said about Epstein: "Some of our faves are going to be implicated..."

The R's want this thing to reach room temperature faster than Epstein because they all want it to go away as fast as possible and again will not hold the true wrongdoers accountable after the grandstanding is done.
 

this picture is all you need to refute the shrieking fauxrage over any/everything Trump that the Left and staunch Dims cry alligator tears about. Every since Election Night, we were told that Impeachment was near, that they were going to impeach the ************. It's almost as if they're - no, it is reality - making up rules and allegations as they go. Do we have a current scorecard on the allegations brought forth by the Dims for this president?

as said before, the Dims have tried to impeach every Republican President for many, many years. Why stop now?
 
Trump has been facing the prospect of impeachment since even before he was elected, due to the simple fact he called for Russian help/interference numerous times as a candidate during the campaign. He did this in the most public and brazen way possible. And Putin and Russia delivered, hacking Hillary's emails & Dem servers a mere five hours after Trump asked them to. Back then, he learned his lesson. Aha, he said to himself, so this is how to win an election? Being the bumbling fool that he is, having gotten away with it once, he decided to go back to the till yet again, to get foreign assistance to take down his current political rival, Biden. This is why we are here today. This is why he must be impeached and removed from office. He has proven time and again he considers himself above the law and beyond reproach. Congress must stand with the Constitution and the American people. And send this tyrannical asshat packing. Most likely off to jail, as he will face multiple indictments once he's out of office.
 
Last edited:
Biden isn't anyone's rival. He is a senile old fool.
 
Biden isn't anyone's rival. He is a senile old fool.

I agree on that end. Not sure why Trump/Giuliani went to all the trouble, maybe they thought he would be a more formidable candidate. And let's not forget Biden was leading Dem polls pretty consistently.
 
Last edited:
It's all working out according to plan.....


LOL



Thanks Impeachment: Trump Now Beating Every Democrat In Three Battleground States

Who knew that when it came to impeachment, its biggest benefactor would be President Donald Trump?

Everyone. Everyone knew that…except the Democrats apparently.

According to Firehouse Strategies, the battleground states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin all consistently showed that Trump was losing to Joe Biden in a match-up, but recently, polling from Firehouse shows that he’s now falling short of beating Trump by six points, and it’s all thanks to impeachment:

As the race currently stands, President Trump is in the lead in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin in hypothetical match-ups against former Vice President Joe Biden, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Bernie Sanders, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and former Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Across the three states, Trump’s closest contest is against Joe Biden, although the president leads by an average of 6 percentage points against each Democrat.

https://www.redstate.com/brandon_mo...ing-every-democrat-three-battleground-states/
 
Trump has been facing the prospect of impeachment since even before he was elected, due to the simple fact he called for Russian help/interference numerous times as a candidate during the campaign. He did this in the most public and brazen way possible. And Putin and Russia delivered, hacking Hillary's emails & Dem servers a mere five hours after Trump asked them to. Back then, he learned his lesson. Aha, he said to himself, so this is how to win an election? Being the bumbling fool that he is, having gotten away with it once, he decided to go back to the till yet again, to get foreign assistance to take down his current political rival, Biden. This is why we are here today. This is why he must be impeached and removed from office. He has proven time and again he considers himself above the law and beyond reproach. Congress must stand with the Constitution and the American people. And send this tyrannical asshat packing. Most likely off to jail, as he will face multiple indictments once he's out of office.


I'm still trying to figure out where there's evidence of Trump committing treason, or behaving dictatorial, or implementing anything without going through proper channels. You keep spouting the Democratic talking points as if they're gospel.

Right now... Congress is breaking the Constitution by marching towards impeachment without the evidence of any high crime or misdemeanor.
Yet they keep using scare tactics that Trump is the one destroying our republic.
 
I'm still trying to figure out where there's evidence of Trump committing treason, or behaving dictatorial, or implementing anything without going through proper channels. You keep spouting the Democratic talking points as if they're gospel.

Right now... Congress is breaking the Constitution by marching towards impeachment without the evidence of any high crime or misdemeanor.
Yet they keep using scare tactics that Trump is the one destroying our republic.

To say nothing of the fact that DACA is COMPLETELY unconstitutional, yet it is treated as the law of the land.
 
Trump has been facing the prospect of impeachment since even before he was elected, due to the simple fact he called for Russian help/interference numerous times as a candidate during the campaign. He did this in the most public and brazen way possible. And Putin and Russia delivered, hacking Hillary's emails & Dem servers a mere five hours after Trump asked them to. Back then, he learned his lesson. Aha, he said to himself, so this is how to win an election? Being the bumbling fool that he is, having gotten away with it once, he decided to go back to the till yet again, to get foreign assistance to take down his current political rival, Biden. This is why we are here today. This is why he must be impeached and removed from office. He has proven time and again he considers himself above the law and beyond reproach. Congress must stand with the Constitution and the American people. And send this tyrannical asshat packing. Most likely off to jail, as he will face multiple indictments once he's out of office.

big swing and a yuge miss.

Trump was sarcastically calling for Russia to find the emails that Hillary sent to others pertaining to yoga (******* right - have you seen her cankles????), grandchildren, recipes and general whatnot. 33,000 emails of those kind. You'd know that if the stick in your *** wasn't perma-wedged sideways.

Had that been Melania sending out 33,000 emails on virtually anything, that were then deleted, the hard drives for those computers destroyed and the servers wiped clean (no, not with a rag), the Dems would be screeching so loudly that aliens would cease to even monitor our existence for 100 years.

and you want to say he was facing the prospect of being impeached before he was elected... think about that. that statement in and of itself shows just how massively butt hurt the snowflakes on the left had their feefees trampled by OrangeManBad.

Further, if Congress didn't "must stand with the Constitution and the American people" under the heavy-handed Obama regime, what makes you believe in any honesty that they'll do anything at this point.
 
copied from elsewhere:

Wouldn't it be cool if the FISA Report came out today & they started handcuffing democrats @ the impeachment hearing?!!
 
I agree on that end. Not sure why Trump/Giuliani went to all the trouble, maybe they thought he would be a more formidable candidate. And let's not forget Biden was leading Dem polls pretty consistently.

Leading the polls doesn't make him a political rival. Hell, being a democrat doesn't make him a political rival. Trump insulting him doesn't make a political rival. In order for them to be rivals, they would have to have a history. They do not, beyond Trump insulting him a few times. Political rival. Give me a break.
 
copied from elsewhere:

That would be cute, but until the report is released and contains anything of substance, I'm not holding my breath. Got a feeling this will be the nothing burger to end all nothing burgers. Maybe get a few no-name lackeys if that. Nobody of any import is going down. Bank it.
 
<samp class="EmbedCode-container"><code class="EmbedCode-code"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The most corrupt President in the history of our nation and Richard Nixon. <a href="https://t.co/lTX69SDPr4">pic.twitter.com/lTX69SDPr4</a></p>— Doug Gordon (@dgordon52) <a href="https://twitter.com/dgordon52/status/1204033297069858817?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 9, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </code></samp>
 
I still haven't had ANYONE answer this for me.

How is it impeachable and unconstitutional for Trump to talk to the Ukraine president and say, "Hey, you ran on corruption, you ought to look in to that possible corruption." But it is apparently NOT impeachable or unconstitutional for the democrat led house to talk to virtually every country they can get on the super-secret red phone and try to find evidence of illegality or corruption?

The dems SAY that the reason this is inappropriate is because it's an election year and Trump is trying to get an advantage over a political opponent. Is it NOT an election year and are the democrats NOT trying to get an advantage over a political opponent?

Asking for a friend.
 
I still haven't had ANYONE answer this for me.

How is it impeachable and unconstitutional for Trump to talk to the Ukraine president and say, "Hey, you ran on corruption, you ought to look in to that possible corruption." But it is apparently NOT impeachable or unconstitutional for the democrat led house to talk to virtually every country they can get on the super-secret red phone and try to find evidence of illegality or corruption?

The dems SAY that the reason this is inappropriate is because it's an election year and Trump is trying to get an advantage over a political opponent. Is it NOT an election year and are the democrats NOT trying to get an advantage over a political opponent?

Asking for a friend.

Tibs may have you on ignore for asking uncomfortable questions. no worries. he won't answer it now, either.
 
Tibs may have you on ignore for asking uncomfortable questions. no worries. he won't answer it now, either.

Nah, I like wig and enjoy reading his posts. I don't have anyone on ignore. Those types of snowflakes are all on your side.

As far as Wig's question, it's dead on arrival. The question was never "Hey, you ran on corruption, you ought to look in to that possible corruption." The assertion was withholding military, financial and political aid unless Ukraine agreed to go after Trump's personal, political opponent. Those two things are wildly different. Trump abused the power of his office, then obstructed Congress in its investigation. That's two counts of impeachment right there.
 
Last edited:
Top