- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 16,354
- Reaction score
- 14,795
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
Same analysis is true for players on the national level, though. The difference in skill level is so acute that equal pay would be bizarre.
The "not equal pay" riff is a lie. Women who have similar careers where gender simply does not matter - medicine, law, academics, journalism, etc. - earn as much as their male counterparts, considering length of employment, time off for child care, etc.
Single women without children earn more in their 20's than do males, because women are now much more likely to earn a college degree because of ... sexism or something. Men out-earn women, by a fairly small amount generally around 1% to 5%, in their 30's and 40's because professional women have children at that age, spend less time at work.
I disagree with the idea the women are less skilled or talented, the only reason they don't play with the men is the same reason men identifying as women should not be competing against women. They are physically different. Skill can't completely make up for simply being bigger stronger and faster. But that is a far cry from saying the skill itself is lacking. I hate to see skill and physical ability intermingled like that. I have known many great physical athletes who had little to no skill and many great technical athletes who had little to no real athletic ability but were skilled and smart about there sport and competed that way.
For me the pay issue still comes down to one simple thing regardless of National or professional. The more you bring in the more you get paid.