So the messenger can be a police hating racist , but I’m suppose to consider his request even though he holds himself to absolutely no standard at all. That is 100% total bullshit.
Yes you are. Because 1) just because you don't like someone doesn't mean everything they say is invalid and 2) he's far from the ONLY person saying this message. He might be the only one that's visible to someone like yourself who doesn't give a **** about the issues he brings to light, but there are MILLIONS. If you can manage to take any of them seriously (doubtful) then listen to them instead. Either way, your feelings about the messenger are irrelevant. Your stance is 100% total bullshit.
Even if the issue isn’t cops kill more black men during arrest has been proven again and again not be true. They are just publicized way more by the media, because race baiting sells papers and increases internet traffic. I believe the relationship between the public and cops can always be improved no matter your skin color. But a start in improving that can be don’t raise your kids to hate co-s, raise them to respect them no matter your skin color.
More 100% total bullshit. Proven again and again not to be true? You are so full of ****. Must be nice to "believe" certain things when you can speak from the perspective of not having to worry about your skin color at all.
https://www.vox.com/cards/police-brutality-shootings-us/us-police-racism
As I said, I don't have a degree, and in my career field I am making as much as the guy next to me that has one. Same with my buddy. A lot of companies are willing to waive degree requirements and they still can't find quality candidates because those with and without degrees mostly sound like idiots during the interview. I can appreciate the things you stated in your post. Honestly. But for some, it simply isn't realistic. And considering that the cat is out of the bag on what higher education costs, if you still choose to go that route you have bear at least some responsibility for the debt you incur, especially when there are cheaper options available. May not be as prestigious, but you get an education without a mountain of debt.
As I said before, the schools are charging that much because they can. Have to pay those fat professors salaries somehow. Same with the $5 million a year the football coach is getting. I agree it is ridiculous. But perhaps if people choose the cheaper options, the market corrects and the cost of private schools comes down some. If they lose enrollment, they are going to have to lower costs. I agree something has to be done going forward, but I can't get on board with forgiving debt over personal choices. This is where parents come in. "Billy, maybe being $120,000 in debt at age 22 isn't the best option for you." No, parents want that trophy child. Can't go to community college for a piece of paper. You need to get the EXPENSIVE, prestigious piece of paper.
Something else. My daughter attends nursing school at Pitt Community College and Greenville, NC. Hospitals in that area recruit that little community college harder than they do UNC, Duke, NC State and ECU because of the quality of the education. Just because it is a big reputable school doesn't mean it is always the best. You can research and find reputable programs at state schools that are on par with the best in the country. That's why to me, if you choose to take on that mountain of debt because of the supposed prestige of one of the schools you mentioned, that makes it a personal choice. That isn't anyone else's fault, given what we know about the cost of education today.
I don't like the anecdotal example of getting into a career without a degree given years of experience. I question whether you are the exception or the norm. That tells me you are of an older generation where, when you were entering, there weren't the stringent education requirements and HR software filtering you out from the applicant pool if you don't have the experience. In the past, it was much easier to "get your foot in the door" through networking, showing a skill, etc without the proper education, then "grandfathering" your way into positions that NOW require degrees. I know one person in a similar situation as you and she makes less than her coworkers because of the lack of degree. But just to get in the door, everything is automated and software based now, and the millennials entering the workforce were so plentiful, employers do not have to "take a chance" on an uneducated person because there are hundreds of people with the required education applying for the same position. It is simply not feasible anymore. I understand there may be some one off examples of that here and there, not saying it's impossible, but it's not a "plan". You shouldn't base your future around the off-chance that that situation might possibly be happen for you. Hope is not a strategy.
I do agree with the second half of your post that schools charge ridiculous amounts because they can, and for various reasons. It's a racket and it's not right. But yes you're right, at some point we have to make practical choices. I did my best to do that for my education, taking some reasonably cost effective options for my degrees (relatively), and I'm still paying more than my car payment every month. Sure I could have taken the risk of going to a less prestigious university, but then the doors would not have opened for me that did. I would not have been able to network the way I have. So I don't think it's just about "the trophy child" (although that is really the parents' fault, and the KIDS are STILL getting screwed). There really is a demonstrable difference to employers, who are choosing between hundreds (thousands?) of applicants. Do you want to take the risk that the tiebreaker that costs you your dream job is because you went to community college and the other person you're going up against went to Harvard? Companies deal with so many applications, so many candidates, they don't "know" you, they don't have the time or resources to go out of their way to interview and get to know every candidate. They need to use the data they have, and which school you went to is a major data point when you are first entering the job force. And even if the best school you can get into is a "cheaper" option (relatively), cheaper than RIDICULOUS still isn't a guarantee that the cost is affordable or reasonable. Just because the alternative is WAY WORSE, doesn't mean the cheaper option still isn't going to cause some hardship after graduation.
But yes as you said, I respect your point of view and I appreciate the discussion. This is something I feel really strongly about so we may not agree, but I'm happy to read your point of view