- Joined
- Sep 23, 2015
- Messages
- 1,508
- Reaction score
- 1,186
- Points
- 113
There could be another rule emerging from this “rivalry,” and I use the term loosely. It could be called the “Chris Boswell rule. “
I went back and watched the game again last night, in light of Boswell’s comments today. He’s right. Josh Shaw (#26) clearly jumped offsides and made a beeline for the kicker. He then stuck his leg out, in an attempt to “block Boswell’s kick” with his leg. Boswell came up gimpy.
I’ll try to give Shaw the benefit of the doubt, but it certainly looked intentional. At a minimum, he was going for the ball, but very possibly could have been going for Boz’ leg. Either way, where is the protection for the kicker? Why else would he intentionally give Boswell a free five years penalty in that situation?
There is a rule against a defender having an unabated path to he QB. Why not protect the kicker (and the holder)? They’re both in a vulnerable position.
Heard talking heads today talking about how injuring the kicker in a situation like that is a good strategy. Look how it worked out for San Diego (I mean LA). Most teams do not have a viable back-up FG kicker. Of course all this assumes the NFL REALLY cares about player safety. [emoji849]
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
I went back and watched the game again last night, in light of Boswell’s comments today. He’s right. Josh Shaw (#26) clearly jumped offsides and made a beeline for the kicker. He then stuck his leg out, in an attempt to “block Boswell’s kick” with his leg. Boswell came up gimpy.
I’ll try to give Shaw the benefit of the doubt, but it certainly looked intentional. At a minimum, he was going for the ball, but very possibly could have been going for Boz’ leg. Either way, where is the protection for the kicker? Why else would he intentionally give Boswell a free five years penalty in that situation?
There is a rule against a defender having an unabated path to he QB. Why not protect the kicker (and the holder)? They’re both in a vulnerable position.
Heard talking heads today talking about how injuring the kicker in a situation like that is a good strategy. Look how it worked out for San Diego (I mean LA). Most teams do not have a viable back-up FG kicker. Of course all this assumes the NFL REALLY cares about player safety. [emoji849]
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
Last edited: