Tomlin has been a fortunate coach, not a great (or even very good) coach. This is evidenced by his inability to win regularly without Ben. When Ben is gone, MT had better leave too, lest he be exposed.
I agree with Terry in that I have no idea what he does beyond cheerleading. I've never seen him coaching up a player on the sideline during a game. I've never seen him discussing coverages with his players the way I see some other coaches do during games. I've never even seen him holding an f'n clipboard during a game, it wouldn't surprise me to find out that he can't read. He tries very hard (too hard) to sound intelligent during his press conferences, but I've never heard him make any salient points regarding football strategy or analysis (hence the title: 'Coach Cliche').
His ability to adjust game plans during games is non-existent, never seen it happen. His only in-game contributions appear to be whether to go for two or kick the extra-point, and he ***** that up on the regular. His use of challenges has been mostly atrocious, the only time he seems to get it right is when the play has little or no bearing on the outcome of the game, like challenging a spot on 2nd and one when we're already up by 17 points late in the 4th quarter.
It was once said that Chuck Knoll's players won in spite of him, rather than because of him, truer words couldn't be said of Mike Tomlin.
I agree with Terry in that I have no idea what he does beyond cheerleading. I've never seen him coaching up a player on the sideline during a game. I've never seen him discussing coverages with his players the way I see some other coaches do during games. I've never even seen him holding an f'n clipboard during a game, it wouldn't surprise me to find out that he can't read. He tries very hard (too hard) to sound intelligent during his press conferences, but I've never heard him make any salient points regarding football strategy or analysis (hence the title: 'Coach Cliche').
His ability to adjust game plans during games is non-existent, never seen it happen. His only in-game contributions appear to be whether to go for two or kick the extra-point, and he ***** that up on the regular. His use of challenges has been mostly atrocious, the only time he seems to get it right is when the play has little or no bearing on the outcome of the game, like challenging a spot on 2nd and one when we're already up by 17 points late in the 4th quarter.
It was once said that Chuck Knoll's players won in spite of him, rather than because of him, truer words couldn't be said of Mike Tomlin.
Last edited: