• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Report: Steelers Expected To Give RB Le’Veon Bell The Franchise Tag

antdrewjosh

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2014
Messages
9,543
Reaction score
3,401
Points
113
Location
Newark,NJ
Pittsburgh Steelers running back Le’Veon Bell is having a fantastic 2016 season and he will be rewarded handsomely for it during the offseason. While it shouldn’t come as a surprise, a Friday morning report by Adam Schefter of ESPN indicates that the Steelers plan on using the franchise tag on Bell ahead of the start of the 2017 league year.

“Here’s what Pittsburgh’s game plan likely will be, according to sources around the league: The Steelers are expected to use the $12.377 million franchise tag on Bell, restricting his ability to go to another team, while trying to hammer out a long-term extension in the offseason,” Schefter reported Friday. “This would provide the Steelers with the protection they would need for a player who is as good as any in the game, but who has been suspended twice and is one strike away from a 10-game suspension.”

Edit: It is worth pointing out Schefter is incorrect on Bell being one strike away from a 10 game suspension. As part of his reduced suspension/settlement, any next failed test would lead to another four game ban. Not ten.

Schefter goes on to say that he fully expects a long-term deal with the Steelers to be worked out that will likely make him one of the highest-paid running backs in the league. He adds, “Bell’s agent, Adisa Bakari, and Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin have developed a close relationship. The two men will want to do right by each other.”

While it’s still a bit early to worry about how contract negotiations will eventually play out with Bell after he’s ultimately issued the franchise tag, former NFL agent Joel Corry wrote extensively about Bell this past September and how he could be the litmus test for high-end running back compensation in 2017. It’s definitely worth a read.

In short, when and if Bell does ultimately sign a long-term contract with the Steelers, you can probably count on it having a yearly average value in the neighborhood of his franchise tag amount. As usual, guarantees and cash flow will play a huge part in those negotiations. Now, there’s always a chance that the two sides could strike a deal prior to the franchise tag being placed on Bell, but as we sit here in the middle of December, I think I’ll be surprised if that ultimately happens.

As long as Bell stays healthy and keeps producing like he has so far this season, it might be in his best interest to force the Steelers hand when it comes to them using the franchise tag on him.

You can rest assured that I’ll be speculating more on Bell’s future status in the coming weeks and months.
 
If the franoise tag is $12m+, doesn't any long term contract need to have a good $26m-$30m in guaranteed $. At least?
 
give him one year, run the wheels off, and draft SeSe Barkley.
 
Any contract should have a clause that he gets a cut to get minimum if he fails a drug test.
 
Not to take away from the Bell talk but how does tagging Le'Veon impact signing Brown long term?

I know we have Brown signed through next season but does this increase, decrease or have no impact at all on our ability to keep this group together?
 
Last edited:
Not to take away from the Bell talk but does how does tagging Le'Veon impact signing Brown long term?

I know we have Brown signed through next season but does this increase, decrease or have no impact at all on our ability to keep this group together?
Depends how much room it leaves you under the cap.
 
I get that. I'm just wondering if at say 12.5 a year which I think is more than fair (but something tells me he's gonna want more) that we could afford to sign Brown long term as well.

I know it's hard to say at this point. Even with a bunch of cap space it seems as if we have a bunch of guys to get under contract in the not so distant future.

I'd really like to see them keep this core group around while Ben is still playing (2019?) I guess we'll just have to see.
 
This was always going to be the plan, well since Bell got the suspension this year. As long as he doesn't holdout it should work well.
 
Bell has 4 more years left in him as a star... he will want a 5 or 6 year deal... im not sure that is wise, ... id rather give brown a six year megabucks deal...
 
Any contract should have a clause that he gets a cut to get minimum if he fails a drug test.

You know it...I know it and everyone knows it ...that that will never happen....ever.
 
I get that. I'm just wondering if at say 12.5 a year which I think is more than fair (but something tells me he's gonna want more) that we could afford to sign Brown long term as well.

I know it's hard to say at this point. Even with a bunch of cap space it seems as if we have a bunch of guys to get under contract in the not so distant future.

I'd really like to see them keep this core group around while Ben is still playing (2019?) I guess we'll just have to see.

At $26m after spending $10m keeping several other players, you'd have to spend all $26m on that to keep Bell and Brown right? Still might not be enough.
 
I bet the *'s would be willing to give up two 1st round picks for Bell. Think of how awesome he would be playing in an Offense that actually KNOWS the defensive calls.
 
Yep. 1 year deal. No more as he's big time risk.


Tomlin said that has just been the natural progression as Bell has matured as a player.

“All areas,” Tomlin said of where he’s seen Bell improve. “Intellectually, understanding of the game, not necessarily what it is he does, but how it fits into the bigger picture. The intellectual conversations with him are much different today than they were then.

“Just understanding how to play the position, the nuances of the position, the protection of the ball and the protection of himself. He’s a guy who’s got some talent. But equally or more importantly than that talent, he’s got a desire to be great and some work ethic to boot. He’s a much better conditioned athlete today than he was in 2014. So I mean it when I say, all areas.”

Though they won’t say it publicly, that also would include off the field.

Bell was suspended for the first two games of the 2015 season after being arrested for a DUI and marijuana possession in August, 2014. He then was suspended three games to open this season for missing three mandatory drug tests at the end of the 2015 regular season - when he was rehabbing a knee injury - and in the ensuing offseason.

Bell passed multiple drug tests in the offseason, including a court-mandated one that helped get the incident expunged from his record, but was suspended for the first three games of this season.
 
At $26m after spending $10m keeping several other players, you'd have to spend all $26m on that to keep Bell and Brown right? Still might not be enough.

Keep in mind, any deal we strike with Brown will LOWER his cap hit for next year. He's currently set to count for 13.6m. Here's a good article on how much and how a contract for Brown could be structured.

http://overthecap.com/looking-possible-contract-extension-antonio-brown/

Basically it would cut his cap hit for next year in half, while giving him $15m+ per year avg, making him the highest paid WR in the game.

So if we have 16m in cap space after all the other players, signing Brown to a new deal would actually give us around 22m in cap space to sign Bell. And this isn't taking into consideration that the cap is going to go up. We really don't know how much cap space we'll have until they announce the new cap for 2017.
 
It's the smart thing to do.
 
Keep in mind, any deal we strike with Brown will LOWER his cap hit for next year. He's currently set to count for 13.6m. Here's a good article on how much and how a contract for Brown could be structured.

http://overthecap.com/looking-possible-contract-extension-antonio-brown/

Basically it would cut his cap hit for next year in half, while giving him $15m+ per year avg, making him the highest paid WR in the game.

So if we have 16m in cap space after all the other players, signing Brown to a new deal would actually give us around 22m in cap space to sign Bell. And this isn't taking into consideration that the cap is going to go up. We really don't know how much cap space we'll have until they announce the new cap for 2017.

I didn't mean just about next year's hit. Just that, in general, you should expect to pay these two at least $26m/year. You could set it up such that it is a few years before the big hits, I guess.
 
Does anybody know if suspended players still count against the salary cap?
 
I didn't mean just about next year's hit. Just that, in general, you should expect to pay these two at least $26m/year. You could set it up such that it is a few years before the big hits, I guess.

Throw Ben's salary on top of that and then explain to me how this will be possible. I truly don't understand it. I've got ZERO capology knowledge
 
Throw Ben's salary on top of that and then explain to me how this will be possible. I truly don't understand it. I've got ZERO capology knowledge
Ben is already under contract and his cap hit is already accounted. The money left for next year FA doesn't have to add Ben or any other player under contract for next season
 
Does anybody know if suspended players still count against the salary cap?

If they are suspended for the year, they do not count. Neither does their year of eligibility with the team. Bryant didn't count at all against the cap and is still going to enter his 2nd season of his contract next year.

When a player is suspended for less than a season, the player is not paid for any games missed, so I assume it wouldn't count against the cap, but I am not positive on that.
 
Top