- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,921
- Reaction score
- 831
- Points
- 113
He would be Patriots dream back.
No the next one is still only 4 games. That was part of the settlement
Bell is a unique football player with talents that are not just as a runner. I can easily envision another team valuing him the same way and would be willing to dump 2 first rounders to get him. If that is the case, the Steelers may have to be a little more aggressive in their contract negotiation. If that's the way the Steelers see it, I can see $12M a season being a distinct possibility. The good thing is, next year we have the cap room to afford it!
It was to me because it led me to believe he wasn't testing positive just missed the tests.. if he was doing both missing test and testing positive on the make up tests there would be no settlementNot exactly reassuring when part of the settlement was negotiating the terms of his next suspension.
The Pats with a 40 years old Brady and $60M of cap space will gladly pay Bell $16M a year to potentially grab a couple more SBs. It's not like the Pats had a #1 pick last year...zero effect on their performance and they would add the ultimate multi-tool RB. If you want to keep him....pay him.
They should remember those years when it comes to signing Bell.I believe that is incorrect. I believe part of the deal with the suspension reduction was avoiding court (cause there was some grey area with the case if you recall) was that he is still on the bottom rung of the ladder while still in the system. Next one is still 4 games I believe.Another positive testing would result in a full year suspension, correct? I think that should play a big role in the contract negotiation. Can't afford to be giving big money if he isn't going to be on the field because of suspensions.
Why would they back the money truck up for him when they do just fine with Blount and filler ? As long as they have Brady, Gronk, Edelman, scrubs and employ cheating, they wont need a prime all-league running back. That's not how they roll.
I think what ever the contract he is given they need to make a stipulation that anymore suspensions for controlled substances mean he is automatically cut and he forfeits the upfront money.
I think what ever the contract he is given they need to make a stipulation that anymore suspensions for controlled substances mean he is automatically cut and he forfeits the upfront money.
Would the 2 first round picks be a bad thing though? Having a healthy Bell in his prime should be priority #1 but he's also 1 suspension away from taking a Bryant-esque sabbatical and he's coming off 2 major knee surgeries within the last few years. RB's have proven to have a notoriously short shelf life of 4-5 years of top play at most before dropping off big time. I'd just hate to overpay for Bell and be handcuffed salary cap wise for the next 4-5 years when looking at RB history, his production is bound to drop off heavily in as little as 2-3 years. 2 1st rounders also give you the best shot at hand picking Ben's replacement should one be worthy after this years draft.
I'm just saying I don't think the chance of someone stealing Bell for 2 first rounders is seen as a negative and they shouldn't give him a couple million more per year just because the chance exists. If a team offered 2 first rounders for Bell next offseason, I'd think twice about saying no (unless it's the Pats, Ravens or Bengals). Not because of Bell's ability (he's clearly the best back in the NFL right now), but because of the short life of the position especially given his injury/suspension history.
Yeah id trade him for two firsts... I always thought rbs are typically a dime a dozen and while he is special, two firsts can really set up Post ben era and its not so hard to replace that you doom the team in the short run...