http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.co...ch-bill-cowher-explains-the-weaknesses-in-the
Former Steelers head coach Bill Cowher explains the weaknesses in the Cover 3 defense
By 58Steel on Jul 20, 2016, 7:13a 10
Robert B. Stanton/Getty Images
TWEET SHARE (81)
I want to share with you another video of Bill Cowher explaining a facet of defense. We've seen Coach Cowher explain some defensive fronts, namely the 3-4 and 4-3. This time, however, we are going to look at coverages. Specifically, we will watch Bill and Pat Kirwan of RealFootball Network, explain the basics of the Cover 3. The Cover 3 was a staple of the Dick Lebeau defense, making it a coverage that Cowher is extremely familiar with. It also remains the predominant coverage the Steelers run under DC Keith Butler.
The primary takeaway I want to focus on is the weakness(es) inherent in the Cover 3. No defense/coverage is without it's weakness. Any particular defense is called with the intent to stop a certain aspect of the opposing offense, knowing you are "allowing" something else.
I bring this up because many times when we, as fans, see an opponent have a successful play, we assume someone on the defense made a mistake, "messed up," or simply was beaten on the play. Often, however, it is simply the result of the opponent taking advantage of the weakness in a particular defense.
As an illustration of this, we're going to look at a play from 2015. This one was against Seattle. As we all know, there were many successful Seahawks plays to choose from in that game, but I digress.
Recall in the latter part of the video where Pat and Bill showed the RB split out as a WR and the TE flexed as a WR as well. In that scenario, Bill explained the seams are particularly vulnerable. That's almost exactly what we get in this Seattle play (the Seahawks are actually in an empty set, with no RB in the backfield, and trips to the right side). The #2 to the right runs down the seam and Russell Wilson hits him for an easy completion and TD.
26BRBPaDyZqntxjEs.0.gif
Since the Steelers are in their nickel package, the personnel is a bit different, but the responsibilities don't change from what Bill showed on the glassboard. Let's break it down:
- 4 man rush (just as in the video)
- RCB (Cockrell), and LCB (Blake) have the deep 1/3 to their side, with FS (Mitchell) having the middle 1/3
- "W" (weak side OLB), Jarvis Jones (?) is walked out, but still has flat responsibility to the weak side
-"M" (Mack LB)Timmons has the curl to the weak side
- "B" here the Buck LB is replaced by an extra DB. The SS (Allen) takes the coverage responsibility of the "B" from the video, curl to the strong side
- "SS" Gay, as the slot CB, assumes the coverage responsibility of the "SS" from the video, covering the flat to the strong side
Again, since the route of the #3 WR holds Mitchell in the middle of the field, there is no one to cover #2 down the seam. The Seahawks exploited a weakness in the Steelers Cover 3 scheme.
One thing Butler said he was going to do was simplify the defense so that the younger players would be able to see the field more quickly. "Spot drops," such as those shown here, are easy to understand. They are also easier to exploit, however, by today's sophisticated offenses.
The answer, defensively, is to "pattern read." This means the defender adjusts his drop, and/or responsibility based on the type of pattern run. Of course, this requires more recognition on the part of the player. When dealing with younger players with less experience, it can leave a defense susceptible to mental mistakes, and result in wide open receivers.
Just to finish that thought on the play vs Seattle: if the Steelers were to pattern read, the defender covering #2WR would stay with him if he ran a vertical, rather than assuming his spot drop (flat responsibility in this case). Would that leave them vulnerable to the flat? Yes, but the other defenders could rally to any potential catch made in that area and make the tackle. That is far better than getting beat over the top.
My main point in showing the video, again, was to allow Coach Cowher to explain the principles of Cover 3. By understanding them, we, as fans, might have a better idea of what we are watching in the game.
Also, as we can see here, it's not always a particular player's mistakes that lead to a successful play by the opponent. Sometimes, it's the opponent taking advantage of an inherent weakness in the scheme.
Former Steelers head coach Bill Cowher explains the weaknesses in the Cover 3 defense
By 58Steel on Jul 20, 2016, 7:13a 10
Robert B. Stanton/Getty Images
TWEET SHARE (81)
I want to share with you another video of Bill Cowher explaining a facet of defense. We've seen Coach Cowher explain some defensive fronts, namely the 3-4 and 4-3. This time, however, we are going to look at coverages. Specifically, we will watch Bill and Pat Kirwan of RealFootball Network, explain the basics of the Cover 3. The Cover 3 was a staple of the Dick Lebeau defense, making it a coverage that Cowher is extremely familiar with. It also remains the predominant coverage the Steelers run under DC Keith Butler.
The primary takeaway I want to focus on is the weakness(es) inherent in the Cover 3. No defense/coverage is without it's weakness. Any particular defense is called with the intent to stop a certain aspect of the opposing offense, knowing you are "allowing" something else.
I bring this up because many times when we, as fans, see an opponent have a successful play, we assume someone on the defense made a mistake, "messed up," or simply was beaten on the play. Often, however, it is simply the result of the opponent taking advantage of the weakness in a particular defense.
As an illustration of this, we're going to look at a play from 2015. This one was against Seattle. As we all know, there were many successful Seahawks plays to choose from in that game, but I digress.
Recall in the latter part of the video where Pat and Bill showed the RB split out as a WR and the TE flexed as a WR as well. In that scenario, Bill explained the seams are particularly vulnerable. That's almost exactly what we get in this Seattle play (the Seahawks are actually in an empty set, with no RB in the backfield, and trips to the right side). The #2 to the right runs down the seam and Russell Wilson hits him for an easy completion and TD.
26BRBPaDyZqntxjEs.0.gif
Since the Steelers are in their nickel package, the personnel is a bit different, but the responsibilities don't change from what Bill showed on the glassboard. Let's break it down:
- 4 man rush (just as in the video)
- RCB (Cockrell), and LCB (Blake) have the deep 1/3 to their side, with FS (Mitchell) having the middle 1/3
- "W" (weak side OLB), Jarvis Jones (?) is walked out, but still has flat responsibility to the weak side
-"M" (Mack LB)Timmons has the curl to the weak side
- "B" here the Buck LB is replaced by an extra DB. The SS (Allen) takes the coverage responsibility of the "B" from the video, curl to the strong side
- "SS" Gay, as the slot CB, assumes the coverage responsibility of the "SS" from the video, covering the flat to the strong side
Again, since the route of the #3 WR holds Mitchell in the middle of the field, there is no one to cover #2 down the seam. The Seahawks exploited a weakness in the Steelers Cover 3 scheme.
One thing Butler said he was going to do was simplify the defense so that the younger players would be able to see the field more quickly. "Spot drops," such as those shown here, are easy to understand. They are also easier to exploit, however, by today's sophisticated offenses.
The answer, defensively, is to "pattern read." This means the defender adjusts his drop, and/or responsibility based on the type of pattern run. Of course, this requires more recognition on the part of the player. When dealing with younger players with less experience, it can leave a defense susceptible to mental mistakes, and result in wide open receivers.
Just to finish that thought on the play vs Seattle: if the Steelers were to pattern read, the defender covering #2WR would stay with him if he ran a vertical, rather than assuming his spot drop (flat responsibility in this case). Would that leave them vulnerable to the flat? Yes, but the other defenders could rally to any potential catch made in that area and make the tackle. That is far better than getting beat over the top.
My main point in showing the video, again, was to allow Coach Cowher to explain the principles of Cover 3. By understanding them, we, as fans, might have a better idea of what we are watching in the game.
Also, as we can see here, it's not always a particular player's mistakes that lead to a successful play by the opponent. Sometimes, it's the opponent taking advantage of an inherent weakness in the scheme.