• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Ok hold on now, Maybe we need to increase global warming! Winter Is Coming!

Global Warming Scam Alert!


Professor, wife convicted of fraud in $700,000 NASA contract

PHILADELPHIA (AP) - A university professor and his wife were convicted Friday of defrauding NASA by letting graduate students and researchers do all the work on a $700,000 project.

Lehigh University engineering professor Yujie Ding and his wife, Yuliya Zotova, told NASA that their startup company would develop a cutting-edge sensor used to track climate change,

Prosecutors called their company, ArkLight, merely "a front" to seek federal grants and said Ding, 53, hid his role in the company from Lehigh.

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/educat...4bdd8500f81d3a8f3b51.html#jYXIKg38tTmfyKX3.99
 
Prosecutors called their company, ArkLight, merely "a front" to seek federal grants

Seriously? Meantime someone near and dear to us turns up in a new Corvette. Just sayin'.
 
Brits bailing on "green energy"?


Just before Paris climate summit, Britain slashes wind, solar subsidies

On November 30th President Obama will join hordes of our ecological betters from around the world at the Paris Climate Summit. Weighty topics of how to save the planet will be discussed and agreements are expected which will further push the cause of eliminating carbon, fossil fuels and everything else we rely on to keep civilization chugging along.

With breathtaking abruptness, the British government has in recent months slashed its support for solar power and other renewable forms of energy, leaving a once-promising industry with grim prospects and throwing into doubt the country's commitment to clean power.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0c5630-8311-11e5-8bd2-680fff868306_story.html

-----------------

Wind farms will create more carbon dioxide, say scientists

Thousands of Britain’s wind turbines will create more greenhouse gases than they save, according to potentially devastating scientific research to be published later this year.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...reate-more-carbon-dioxide-say-scientists.html

----------

The obsession with global warming will put the lights out all over Britain


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...will-put-the-lights-out-all-over-Britain.html
 
derp



Sanders: 'To hell with the fossil fuel industry'


"Climate change is already causing devastating problems all over this world. To hell with the fossil fuel industry."

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/261019-sanders-to-hell-with-the-fossil-fuel-industry

--------------------

He must have **** in his Depends again - what a senile old fool

The hell with heating, air-conditioning, refrigeration, plastics, clothes, food distribution!!

No more cars, planes, trains. WALK EVERYWHERE!

Back to the dark ages clothed in burlap bags, living in mud yurts, eating twigs and berries.

What a ******* lunatic
 
http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11...sed-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/

Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims Ahead of UN Summit ‘Irrational’ – ‘Based On Nonsense’ – ‘Leading us down a false path’

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: 'Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial.' - 'When someone says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period.'

Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer: 'Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. We are being led down a false path. To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. Where does that lead us eventually?'

Greenpeace Co-Founder Dr. Patrick Moore: 'We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science.'


AUSTIN, Texas – A team of prominent scientists gathered in Texas today at a climate summit to declare that fears of man-made global warming were “irrational” and “based on nonsense” that “had nothing to do with science.” They warned that “we are being led down a false path” by the upcoming UN climate summit in Paris.

The scientists appeared at a climate summit sponsored by the Texas Public Policy Foundation. The summit in Austin was titled: “At the Crossroads: Energy & Climate Policy Summit.”

Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen, an emeritus Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT, derided what he termed climate “catastrophism.”

“Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial,” Lindzen said.

Lindzen cautioned: “The most important thing to keep in mind is – when you ask ‘is it warming, is it cooling’, etc. — is that we are talking about something tiny (temperature changes) and that is the crucial point.”

Lindzen also challenged the oft-repeated UN IPCC claim that most of warming over past 50 years was due to mankind.

“People get excited over this. Is this statement alarming? No,” Lindzen stated.

“We are speaking of small changes 0.25 Celsius would be about 51% of the recent warming and that strongly suggests a low and inconsequential climate sensitivity – meaning no problem at all,” Lindzen explained.

“I urge you when looking at a graph, check the scales! The uncertainty here is tenths of a degree,” he noted.

“When someone points to this and says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period. And they are arguing over hundredths of a degree when it is uncertain in tenths of a degree,” Lindzen said.

“And the proof that the uncertainty is tenths of a degree are the adjustments that are being made. If you can adjust temperatures to 2/10ths of a degree, it means it wasn’t certain to 2/10ths of a degree,” he said. (Also See: Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues)

“The UN IPCC wisely avoided making the claim that 51% of a small change in temperature constitutes a problem. They left this to the politicians and anyone who took the bait,” he said.

Lindzen noted that National Academy of Sciences president Dr. Ralph Cicerone has even admitted that there is no evidence for catastrophic claims of man-made global warming. See: Backing away from climate alarm? NAS Pres. Ralph Cicerone says ‘we don’t have that kind of evidence’ to claim we are ‘going to fry’ from AGW...

Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer, who has authored over 200 peer-reviewed papers, called policies to reduce CO2 “based on nonsense.”

“Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. They are all based on computer models that do not work. We are being led down a false path.

“Our breath is not that different from a power plant,” he continued.

“To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. Where does that lead us eventually?” he asked.

“Coal, formed from ancient CO2, is a benefit to the world. Coal is CO2 from ancient atmospheres. We are simply returning CO2 to the atmosphere from which it came when you burn coal. And it’s a good thing since it is at very low levels in the atmosphere. We are in a CO2 famine. It is very, very low,” Happer explained.

Happer continued: “CO2 will be beneficial and crop yields will increase.” “More CO2 will be a very significant benefit to agriculture,” he added.

Happer then showed a picture of polluted air in China with the caption: “Real pollution in Shanghai.”

“If you can see it, it’s not CO2,” Happer said.

“If plants could vote, they would vote for coal,” Happer declared.

Happer also rebutted the alleged 97% consensus.

“97% of scientists have often been wrong on many things,” he said.
 
Not to be outdone, the Beast chimes in.........

“By the end of my first term, we will have installed a half a billion more solar panels, and by the end of my second term, enough clean energy to power every home in America,” Clinton said at the Blue Jamboree in Charleston, S.C., on Saturday.

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-en...h-clean-energy-to-power-every-home-in-america

Which proves she knows nothing about solar panels or clean energy. Does anybody really know how stupid this sounds? People bitched about Trump's "unrealistic" deportation of 11 million aliens. This is 1000X more unrealistic and is really impossible. But I'm sure NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC etc... won't call her out on it.
 
That's the thing, "green energy" doesn't produce enough energy to be self-sufficient without government subsidies. The only way to use it is to artificially lower the cost with subsidies and artificially raise the cost of fossil fuels with taxes.
 
Gonna have to see this...

 
That's the thing, "green energy" doesn't produce enough energy to be self-sufficient without government subsidies. The only way to use it is to artificially lower the cost with subsidies and artificially raise the cost of fossil fuels with taxes.

You are correct. But even with subsidies green energy can't replace fossil fuels. It is unrealistic and really just stupid. Talk about unscientific? People that worship at the altar of AGW are just blowing off real science. Do they have no idea what fossil fuels are really used for? Do they not know that almost everything that is made comes from fossil fuels or bi-products? Hell I could list a 1000 things that come from oil alone. And their devotion to that flat earth religion is just plain stupid.
 
The other thing is that if global warming was real, which it's not, why exactly is that bad? At least half the planet would have longer growing seasons. If some coastal houses get swamped, so what? Only 1%ers can afford beachfront houses anyway. People get sick when it's cold, let's all be warmer and healthier.

And their devotion to that flat earth religion is just plain stupid.

 
The other thing is that if global warming was real, which it's not, why exactly is that bad? At least half the planet would have longer growing seasons. If some coastal houses get swamped, so what? Only 1%ers can afford beachfront houses anyway. People get sick when it's cold, let's all be warmer and healthier.




“Coal, formed from ancient CO2, is a benefit to the world. Coal is CO2 from ancient atmospheres. We are simply returning CO2 to the atmosphere from which it came when you burn coal. And it’s a good thing since it is at very low levels in the atmosphere. We are in a CO2 famine. It is very, very low,” Happer explained.

Read more: http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11...e-leading-us-down-a-false-path/#ixzz3sFc8awzA
 
Global Warming Alert!


“A New Heavy Icebreaker Is Essential” Claim Great Lakes Senators


United States Senators Gary Peters and Debbie Stabenow sent a letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Homeland Security calling for robust funding in the fiscal year 2016 appropriations legislation for the U.S. Coast Guard to design and build a new heavy icebreaker for the Great Lakes region.

The heavy ice seen in recent winters has seriously impaired commercial shipping and economic activity in the Great Lakes. Last winter, cargo shipping decreased by 3.2 million tons, costing $355 million in lost revenue and nearly 2,000 jobs

http://gcaptain.com/a-new-heavy-icebreaker-is-essential-claim-great-lakes-senators/
 
Global Warming Alert!


“A New Heavy Icebreaker Is Essential” Claim Great Lakes Senators


United States Senators Gary Peters and Debbie Stabenow sent a letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Homeland Security calling for robust funding in the fiscal year 2016 appropriations legislation for the U.S. Coast Guard to design and build a new heavy icebreaker for the Great Lakes region.

The heavy ice seen in recent winters has seriously impaired commercial shipping and economic activity in the Great Lakes. Last winter, cargo shipping decreased by 3.2 million tons, costing $355 million in lost revenue and nearly 2,000 jobs

http://gcaptain.com/a-new-heavy-icebreaker-is-essential-claim-great-lakes-senators/

I assume these will be solar powered?
 
 
Not to be outdone, the Beast chimes in.........

“By the end of my first term, we will have installed a half a billion more solar panels, and by the end of my second term, enough clean energy to power every home in America,” Clinton said
Vote for Pedr..er, Hillary and all of your wildest dreams will come true.
 
Mother Nature is taking a load to the face right now. This fire is blazing!
 
I would vastly prefer to be governed by Mahmoud Mansour than by Bammy.

Does that still make me a racist?
 
What's funny about that video is you could start putting like a million different subtitles and it could work.

Sort of how that Hitler/Nazi video with subtitles went completely viral with all sorts topics (mostly sports).

I would love to see 3 egyptian newcasters arguing and laughing about Deflategate or Greg Hardy.

Someone that knows a bit more about video editing needs to get on that. You could have a HUGE hit on your hands.
 
A German professor has confirmed what skeptics from Britain to the US have long suspected: that NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies has largely invented “global warming” by tampering with the raw temperature data records.

Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert is a retired geologist and data computation expert. He has painstakingly examined and tabulated all NASA GISS’s temperature data series, taken from 1153 stations and going back to 1881. His conclusion: that if you look at the raw data, as opposed to NASA’s revisions, you’ll find that since 1940 the planet has been cooling, not warming.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...nasa-fiddled-climate-data-unbelievable-scale/
 
Top