Ok hold on now, Maybe we need to increase global warming! Winter Is Coming!

[hamster]

Nice Ad Hominem overall , and nice touch with the straw man at the end too.....Elfie admirer of Felito Cruz....lol...steel time an ambulance chaser who uses the term "fucknut"....

You can be Felito's fan club president for all I care, I know what he's about. Like I said, slimy.

The good news is he'll take his campaign money, write a few books telling us how he would have clobbered those libs if he had become potus, then disappear.

Felito while bright, is a person almost no one liked in college. Smug, arrogant, and inflexible.A good debater but from what I've read his inflexibility is what made him lose to the top debaters in the country quite often.

Here is what another one of his professors had to say about him:

Edward Bergman, a New Jersey lawyer who taught Cruz in a course on alternative dispute resolution, says Cruz's classroom manner and written work displayed a smugness that made him unpopular.

In the course, Cruz wrote a final paper concluding that alternatives meant to ease the glut of court cases nationwide are "obstacles to the people's rights" to trial and due process.

"There he is, in a nutshell," Bergman says. "He was somebody who gave the impression that very complex issues are really not*so complex, and he can tell you the superior, correct view. It's a smug, know-it-all attitude about the world.

So you see while you may accuse me of being another poster, being a woman,( all part of your paranoid conspiracies including AGW being a hoax)

You are a sychopant of a guy who really did change his name(to something more Anglo of course) Felito/Ted, and of a guy so brilliant...so brilliant........

That a " libtard" like Chris Mathews handed his *** to him in that video,....and with that I rest my case counselor.

Dude.Give it up. This is embarrassing. You are looking like a mop, and Steeltime is doing the cleaning.

 

[DBS1970]

Each state already has their own environmental department.

Well there is that and the fact the the Federal Government has zero authority to regulate anything inside the borders of a sovereign state that is not a federal reservation.

 

[Rod Farva]

It's time to abolish the EPA



Another setback for Obama: Court halts EPA’s controversial water rule

A federal appeals court on Friday dealt the Obama administration’s environmental agenda a major blow, halting a highly controversial water rule and saying more time is needed to determine whether the regulations are legal.

Critics had said the rule would give the Environmental Protection Agency control over irrigation ditches, canals and small streams, giving the federal government a say in permitting and land-use decisions over millions of acres of land surrounding those waters.

A lower court had already blocked the rule in 13 states, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit issued a nationwide stay, undercutting the EPA’s push to try to carry out the rule in the rest of the country.

In a 2-1 decision, the majority said the process the EPA used to write the new rules was “facially suspect” because the agency didn’t tell the public never asked the public for comments on the far-reaching limits it ended up imposing.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/9/court-halts-epas-water-rule/?page=all#pagebreak

What's bothersome here is that the courts made this ruling based on what amounts to an administrative or procedural "error" ......"the agency didn’t tell the public never asked the public for comments on the far-reaching limits it ended up imposing" and not on the merits or flaws of the epa's proposal (or for that matter their entire existence and authority.) I mean, I'll take it......any curtailing of that agency's actions is a win but....

 

[deljzc]

Cruz scares the bejeezus out of me.

I'll vote for anyone just to make sure he doesn't get his finger on the red button. Of all the 20 candidates still out there on both side, he's the one that has "WAR" written all over him.

Being strong is one thing, being so strong you think you can't fail is another.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

Being strong is one thing, being so strong you think you can't fail is another.

It's so funny how Libs can see this in R candidates, but completely overlook that this is how every sound, sane American views Bammy - a nut job who believes he can't fail and will do anything, by hook or by crook, to get his way - bypassing the Constitution and breaking laws to get there.

Good stuff Del, good stuff.

 

[Rod Farva]

Cruz scares the bejeezus out of me.

I'll vote for anyone just to make sure he doesn't get his finger on the red button. Of all the 20 candidates still out there on both side, he's the one that has "WAR" written all over him.

Being strong is one thing, being so strong you think you can't fail is another.

What's Cruz said or done to provoke this reaction and "fear"?

 

[Ron Burgundy]

What's Cruz said or done to provoke this reaction and "fear"?

He filibustered against ObamaCare. Therefore Cruz is the debbil.

 

[Elfiero]

You contradict yourself in the space of two comments made 24 hours apart, idiot.

Further, your comment that Cruz supposedly lacked skills as a college debater is another elfiePolo lie:

Moreover, you clearly have no clue how debate competitions work if you claim that Cruz's "inflexibility" made him unsuccessful in debates. The way the debates work, those in competition do not know which side of the debate the person was to have before the debate begins. Another elfiePolo lie.

Further, this particular debate arose when you stated that Ted Cruz is dumb. You said that, buttlick, not me. I cited facts showing that you are a lying, ignorant slut. Once again, the undeniable fact is that Cruz graduated with honors from Princeton and high honors from Harvard Law School. I have substantial reason to say that Cruz is one of the most intelligent people on earth.

Seeing that your flaccid attempt to impugn Cruz's intellect fails, you then change the subject and blather about Cruz's personality. First, the "ooooh, he is so mean" commentary is completely irrelevant to your false claim that Cruz is stupid. You probably don't understand that because you are in fact too dumb to follow the arguments, even those you raise. Second, you have no basis for commenting on Cruz's personality.

Also, you are still denying adopting the user name "PoloMalu43" last year, despite the fact that elfie disappeared at the same time Polo43 appeared, Polo43 had exactly the same political and environmental views as elfie, Polo43 had the same writing style as elfie, and lo and behold, once elfie returns, Polo43 disappears.

Yeah, one need not have graduated with honors from Princeton to know that you are elfie/Polo43, and a liar.

Finally, you like playing pretend lawyer. But as expected, when make-believe encounters the real thing, the fake gets destroyed. So why don't you tell us again that Cruz is dumb, fake-counselor-wanna-be?

I said I rest my case as sarcasm and yet I meant it. The thing is you won't let it go and keep attacking me while avoiding the crux of my point; Felito is a hypocrite and an opportunist. Mathews showed this to the whole world.

I didn't contradict myself ; as I said Felito "strikes me" as slightly smarter than Palin because I didn't know much about him, and thought he was just another Reich wing/fundie Christian/putz.

After reading all about him and using my area of expertise to analyze him i now see that he is bright, but he's also just your garden variety psychopathic putz.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/2...s-in-princeton-debate-club.html?referer=&_r=0

I didn't lie about his debate skills either. While I can't post quotes from every source I used, I did go back and dig up something to verify what I said.

Even after his defeat at the nationals, Mr. Cruz had one last shot at glory, this time debating for Harvard Law School. In 1995, as so-called circuit dinosaurs, he and Mr. Panton, now his law school classmate, teamed up and made it to the semifinals of the world championships.

Mr. Cruz’s reputation had gone intercontinental. His Australian opponents warned the crowd at Princeton against the rhetorical slickness, but substantive weakness, of what they described as the famous Teflon Team, according to audience members. For a final time, Mr. Cruz lost.

Whatever paranoid delusions you have about "polo" and me being one and the same I don't know what to tell you. You also believe AGW "science" from people being paid by Exxon...,..get help please.

As far as intellect goes cruz is a lawyer...let's just say in the field I work in he would be bringing people coffee.

Lastly I don't play "pretend lawyer", that profession is of no interest to me. In fact I would rather be a herpes sore on the tip of the devils d*** in hell.....but the more I think about the idea of most lawyers going to hell immediately upon death, and the prospect of being covered in lawyer feces _24/7..... that's really a false dichotomy.I think I'd rather be a cancer tumor.

 

[Confluence]

I said I rest my case as sarcasm and yet I meant it. The thing is you won't let it go and keep attacking me while avoiding the crux of my point; Felito is a hypocrite and an opportunist. Mathews showed this to the whole world.

I didn't contradict myself ; as I said Felito "strikes me" as slightly smarter than Palin because I didn't know much about him, and thought he was just another Reich wing/fundie Christian/putz.

After reading all about him and using my area of expertise to analyze him i now see that he is bright, but he's also just your garden variety psychopathic putz.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/2...s-in-princeton-debate-club.html?referer=&_r=0

I didn't lie about his debate skills either. While I can't post quotes from every source I used, I did go back and dig up something to verify what I said.

Even after his defeat at the nationals, Mr. Cruz had one last shot at glory, this time debating for Harvard Law School. In 1995, as so-called circuit dinosaurs, he and Mr. Panton, now his law school classmate, teamed up and made it to the semifinals of the world championships.

Mr. Cruz’s reputation had gone intercontinental. His Australian opponents warned the crowd at Princeton against the rhetorical slickness, but substantive weakness, of what they described as the famous Teflon Team, according to audience members. For a final time, Mr. Cruz lost.

Whatever paranoid delusions you have about "polo" and me being one and the same I don't know what to tell you. You also believe AGW "science" from people being paid by Exxon...,..get help please.

As far as intellect goes cruz is a lawyer...let's just say in the field I work in he would be bringing people coffee.

Lastly I don't play "pretend lawyer", that profession is of no interest to me. In fact I would rather be a herpes sore on the tip of the devils d*** in hell.....but the more I think about the idea of most lawyers going to hell immediately upon death, and the prospect of being covered in lawyer feces _24/7..... that's really a false dichotomy.I think I'd rather be a cancer tumor.

Wow, grandiose much?

Your clear need to trumpet your wonderousness demonstrates your self esteem Elfie.

Hope the therapy continues to help you.

 

[ark steel]

Wow, grandiose much?

Your clear need to trumpet your wonderousness demonstrates your self esteem Elfie.

Hope the therapy continues to help you.

After reading all about him and using my area of expertise to analyze him

LOL. Had this dumb ***** on Ignore for quite a while. Thanks, Con, for quoting him/her so I could see this gem.

 

[Elfiero]

Dude.Give it up. This is embarrassing. You are looking like a mop, and Steeltime is doing the cleaning.

Really? To use a football metaphor; what game are you watching?

You haven't noticed that for all of steeltime's name calling and pounding of the idea that Cruz is brilliant he never addresses Cruz being shown for the hypocrite he is? How Mathews exposed him for the smug jackass he is ?

Mathew's point is Felito loved when the supreme court stole the election from Gore and gave it to their guy, but hated the court when they upheld gay rights, even calling for retention elections for the justices.

He presents himself as a man of principle ,but he's A HYPOCRITE!

 

[Rod Farva]

I don't know why the head of the Sierra club is being questioned on climate science in this video????

This is equvilant to me asking the president of the PGA tour to explain the metallurgy aspect of golf club manufacturing. I would expect him to say "trust me, the golf clubs work quite well".

I'd expect him to tell me the truth....if that means saying "I'm not well enough educated on the subject to say" so be it. I respect honest ignorance more than dishonest bullshit.

That's without even bringing up the fact that Cruz's questions are based on nonsense; there is no "pause",and you don't look at climate data with 18 year or as in the case of a poster here 17 year baselines.

Certainly not when the data refutes your point.

I myself could also take Cruz, put him in front of cameras, question him on climate change and make him look like the jackass he is in about 5 minutes.

I'm pretty sure you couldn't. And you dare to refer to Cruz as "smug"?

Of course I would use the facts, something that Cruz has an aversion for, and not just when it comes to AGW.

Yeah I didn't watch it through the first time since Cruz was stuck on pauses and incorrect representations. I watched it all now and heard nothing but his claims of objective truth,and data being data at the end.

He doesn't know what he's looking at( I doubt he even looked at it) and he doesn't understand how the hadcrut data is used nor its shortcomings, like I said ;nonsense coming from a jackass.

He strikes me as a slightly more intelligent (which isn't saying much)male version of Palin, but every bit as slimy.

Its not that hard to prove he's a jackass .Like I said earlier not just concerning AGW either.

Nice Ad Hominem overall , and nice touch with the straw man at the end too.....Elfie admirer of Felito Cruz....lol...steel time an ambulance chaser who uses the term "fucknut"....

You can be Felito's fan club president for all I care, I know what he's about. Like I said, slimy.

The good news is he'll take his campaign money, write a few books telling us how he would have clobbered those libs if he had become potus, then disappear.

Felito while bright, is a person almost no one liked in college. Smug, arrogant, and inflexible.A good debater but from what I've read his inflexibility is what made him lose to the top debaters in the country quite often.

"Smug, arrogant, and inflexible".........you would know, wouldn't you? And "ad hominem" is exactly your forte' like most libs......it's what you all end up using because none of your arguments convince anyone of any intelligence of anything.

Here is what another one of his professors had to say about him:

Edward Bergman, a New Jersey lawyer who taught Cruz in a course on alternative dispute resolution, says Cruz's classroom manner and written work displayed a smugness that made him unpopular.

In the course, Cruz wrote a final paper concluding that alternatives meant to ease the glut of court cases nationwide are "obstacles to the people's rights" to trial and due process.

"There he is, in a nutshell," Bergman says. "He was somebody who gave the impression that very complex issues are really not*so complex, and he can tell you the superior, correct view. It's a smug, know-it-all attitude about the world.

So you see while you may accuse me of being another poster, being a woman,( all part of your paranoid conspiracies including AGW being a hoax)

You are a sychopant of a guy who really did change his name(to something more Anglo of course) Felito/Ted, and of a guy so brilliant...so brilliant........

That a " libtard" like Chris Mathews handed his *** to him in that video,....and with that I rest my case counselor.

Handed his *** to him? A few seconds of soundbites that are ALL Chris Mathews and almost NO Ted Cruz interspersed among a diatribe of ad hominem attacks on Cruz's looks is "handing his *** to him"?

Really? To use a football metaphor; what game are you watching?

You haven't noticed that for all of steeltime's name calling and pounding of the idea that Cruz is brilliant he never addresses Cruz being shown for the hypocrite he is? How Mathews exposed him for the smug jackass he is ?

I'm addressing it.....that heavily edited video showed nothing even close o what you purport it to show. Now go get me some coffee.

 

[Elfiero]

Handed his *** to him? A few seconds of soundbites that are ALL Chris Mathews and almost NO Ted Cruz interspersed among a diatribe of ad hominem attacks on Cruz's looks is "handing his *** to him"?






I'm addressing it.....that heavily edited video showed nothing even close o what you purport it to show. Now go get me some coffee.

I wouldn't waste my time unless you want to end up with that almost in tears look Felito wears.

I've seen the whole interview and I know you're going to go with Felito's " they counted four times" angle, you're wasting your time, and missing the point.

The point was and is that the Florida Supreme court wanted to recount again, and the overvotes would have made Gore the winner. The Florida secratary of state(Repugnican) interfered then so did the US Supremes to make sure W got in the WH.

Regardless of the winner the point really is that that a partisan US supreme court interfered and Cruz loved it, gay rights and SCOTUS involved....not so much BECAUSE HE'S A HYPOCRITE.. There is documented proof that if the under votes would have been counted Gore would have won.

Read the article and read both links the author provided,especially the second one that has proof Judge Lewis would have allowed the under votes.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/06/yes-bush-v-gore-did-steal-the-election.html

 

[hamster]

Really? To use a football metaphor; what game are you watching?

You haven't noticed that for all of steeltime's name calling and pounding of the idea that Cruz is brilliant he never addresses Cruz being shown for the hypocrite he is? How Mathews exposed him for the smug jackass he is ?

Mathew's point is Felito loved when the supreme court stole the election from Gore and gave it to their guy, but hated the court when they upheld gay rights, even calling for retention elections for the justices.

He presents himself as a man of principle ,but he's A HYPOCRITE!

Really? He argues , and proves, his case like the talented lawyer he is. You shout talking points like the cornball academic that you are. Please bring back the clown car videos. At least it adds entertainment value to an otherwise valueless post.

 

[SteelChip]

The point was and is that the Florida Supreme court wanted to recount again, and the overvotes would have made Gore the winner. The Florida secratary of state(Repugnican) interfered then so did the US Supremes to make sure W got in the WH.

Whew, that would have put this guy in the WH, that's enough to ruin a good day.

 

[Steeltime]

Even after his defeat at the nationals, Mr. Cruz had one last shot at glory, this time debating for Harvard Law School. In 1995, as so-called circuit dinosaurs, he and Mr. Panton, now his law school classmate, teamed up and made it to the semifinals of the world championships.

So elfiePolo cites an article noting that Cruz made it to the world debate semifinals to support his argument that Cruz is dumb. And poor in debate.

Jesus, at least try to make it difficult to embarrass you, asswipe.

Whatever paranoid delusions you have about "polo" and me being one and the same I don't know what to tell you.

You disappeared at the exact time that Polo began to pollute Steeler Nation. Polo then mimicked your writing style and political views to a tee. Polo disappears at the exact same time that the genital wart known as elfie re-appears, and Polo has not been seen since.

You are Polo. That, and a lying ****.

As far as intellect goes cruz is a lawyer...let's just say in the field I work in he would be bringing people coffee.

Oh, so you work in a restaurant? How well does dishwashing pay?

And Cruz graduated with honors from Princeton. Only a complete ******* idiot would suggest that Cruz is anything other than brilliant.

You suggest that Cruz is something other than brilliant.

Complete the syllogism, genius.

Lastly I don't play "pretend lawyer", that profession is of no interest to me. In fact I would rather be a herpes sore on the tip of the devils d*** in hell.....but the more I think about the idea of most lawyers going to hell immediately upon death, and the prospect of being covered in lawyer feces _24/7..... that's really a false dichotomy.I think I'd rather be a cancer tumor.

So your goal in life is to be a herpes sore on the devil's dick, and/or a cancer tumor?

From what I have seen from you - congrats, you have achieved your life's goal.

 

[Elfiero]

I said he was a smart guy, smart enough to fool you guys.

Regardless of that he is a lying, psychopathic POS that has no integrity, of that there is no doubt.

You want proof of course.....



Where will you run to now?

 

[Ron Burgundy]

Big time El Nino forecast for this year. All the snow will be from people driving SUV's that we need to get around in the snow.

http://www.aol.com/article/2015/10/...7|htmlws-main-bb|dl3|sec1_lnk2&pLid=473077174

 

[Rod Farva]

As far as intellect goes cruz is a lawyer...let's just say in the field I work in he would be bringing people coffee.

Sorry, Your Brilliance but in the field in which I work extraneous prepositions are seen as....well, not a sign of brilliance.

Where will you run to now?

I dunno.....maybe somewhere they don't keep doing this.

Not being a grammar Nazi but if you're going to claim to be on the same intellectual level as a magna cum laude grad of Princeton with a law degree from Harvard you might want to consider stuff like that.

 

[Sarge]

a lying, psychopathic POS that has no integrity, of that there is no doubt.

Are you describing Cruz? It's a pretty accurate description of both Hillary and Obama.

 

[Steeltime]

elfiePolo, in the form of Kevin Bacon, during a debate on Steeler Nation:

And the decision as to elfiePolo's arguments is this:

 

[Elfiero]

Sorry, Your Brilliance but in the field in which I work extraneous prepositions are seen as....well, not a sign of brilliance.





I dunno.....maybe somewhere they don't keep doing this.

Not being a grammar Nazi but if you're going to claim to be on the same intellectual level as a magna cum laude grad of Princeton with a law degree from Harvard you might want to consider stuff like that.

That post was meant for steeltime.

You are being a grammar nazi, but I understand as your only other choice would be to address Felito's lack of character, and we know neither you or Steeltime are ever going to do that.

Case closed.

https://imgflip.com/memegenerator

 

[Elfiero]

elfiePolo, in the form of Kevin Bacon, during a debate on Steeler Nation:

How original. Related to Ron Burgundy are we?

 

[Ron Burgundy]

How original. Related to Ron Burgundy are we?

I'm kind of a big deal.

 

[Steeltime]

You are being a grammar nazi, but I understand as your only other choice would be to address Felito's lack of character, and we know neither you or Steeltime are ever going to do that.

Okay, genius, two points:

(1) Neither/nor, not "neither or"
(2) Neither/nor creates a single (not plural) subject, so "neither/nor is," not "neither/nor are."

Dumbass ...