• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

A possible solution in Syria

I'm not stressed "about these things." I'm stressed that so many so-called patriotic American conservatives let themselves get bamboozled by Vladimir Putin.

I've already explained this to you.

hugehogballs.jpg
 
Last edited:
Why would Russia do such a thing? ISIS is quite useful for both the Russians and the Syrians.

I'm not stressed "about these things." I'm stressed that so many so-called patriotic American conservatives let themselves get bamboozled by Vladimir Putin.

You assume much.
 
Why would Russia do such a thing? ISIS is quite useful for both the Russians and the Syrians.

I'm not stressed "about these things." I'm stressed that so many so-called patriotic American conservatives let themselves get bamboozled by Vladimir Putin.

The only one that appears bamboozled is Bammy. ....or in cahoots. After all, didn't he just have a sit down with Vlad a week or so ago? And didn't he tell Medvedev that he would have more fexibility after reelection? Hmm.
 
The short term for us as Americans is not bad. Let Russia do some of the heavy lifting for a while.

The long term is a disaster.

The precedence this sets is very dangerous and greatly increases the threat of an escalation of military action between Russia, China, NATO and the U.S.

It is clear by our policy that we have lost all ability to oust al-Assad in Syria. That ship has long sailed now. The world has basically allowed Putin to back him and any efforts to do anything could be an act of aggression against Russia. That's a path I don't think the west wants to take right now.

The next attempt Russia will make to push the envelope will be in Iraq. He will argue he is chasing ISIS and eliminating a threat to his nation (which might be somewhat true). But what is our position? We've left Iraq alone and they have done what any struggling nation would do... find alliances with people that are willing to help, i.e. Iran and Russia.

Again, I see no negatives for Russia to unite the Shiites from Iran to Syria and then permanently set up shop as a military force to maintain order in the region. Where the Sunni's go, I have no idea. Likely fighting the Kurds along the Tigris.

This all started with Iraq's defacto government that formed after the Iraq War being almost entirely Shiite. They decided to become non-secular and we allowed it. They decided (based on religion) to start to align themselves with Iran and we allowed it. Iraq decide to let the Sunni north and west go to chaos and we allowed it.

And now our lack of diplomacy and action has created the perfect scenario for Russia to re-establish itself as a world power and create a stretch of allies in the Middle East that rivals anything the west has geographically. It also creates a strong conglomerate of oil producing countries (Russia/Iran/Iraq) that can aid in manipulation of oil prices and production vs. OPEC.

I'm worried how all this shakes out and what the region looks like in 5 years. Especially because I think Clinton is going to win the white house.
 
relax - Bammy isn't going to do anything


U.S. will not directly confront Russia in Syria, Obama says

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c1f7fc-6932-11e5-9223-70cb36460919_story.html

---------------------

He's too busy with more important matters


Obama admin bans pork products from federal prisons


The Obama administration has banned bacon, pork chops, pork links, ham and all other pork products from all federal prisons.

“In general we welcome the change because it’s facilitating the accommodation of Muslim inmates,’ said CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper. “We hope it’s not an indication of an increasing number of Muslims in the prison system.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...minate-pork-from-the-menu-in-federal-prisons/
 
BHO is probably the weakest president I've ever seen. He makes Carter look like Reagan in comparison. The middle east is ruled by force and strong men. I don't like it but that's just the reality of the situation. BHO's inaction allowed Russia to just walk in. The real issue in Syria is the lack of proxies. Normally U.S. force at least allows proxy wars so direct conflict isn't necessary. That's gone now. Russia wouldn't be anywhere near Syria if not for this feeble middle east policy (and I use policy very loosely). Also while this is going on Afghanistan is still a mess. The U.S. will be leaving it soon. I wonder what will happen there?
 
He's too busy with more important matters


Obama admin bans pork products from federal prisons


The Obama administration has banned bacon, pork chops, pork links, ham and all other pork products from all federal prisons.

“In general we welcome the change because it’s facilitating the accommodation of Muslim inmates,’ said CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper. “We hope it’s not an indication of an increasing number of Muslims in the prison system.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...minate-pork-from-the-menu-in-federal-prisons/

I was gonna say, might want to ask why so many Muslims are in prison.
 
Obama doesn't make ANY decisions...

say it with me now....Obama doesn't make ANY decisions.

he's a well spoken pretty Afro American puppet....y'all hating him so much is silly.....

you REALLY think they let him "decide " a damn thing?

it is to laugh......
 
Obama doesn't make ANY decisions...

say it with me now....Obama doesn't make ANY decisions.

he's a well spoken pretty Afro American puppet....y'all hating him so much is silly.....

you REALLY think they let him "decide " a damn thing?

it is to laugh......

Who are "they"?
 
Who are "they"?

I truly believe that there is a loosely tied network of industrialists, oil magnates, bankers, political operatives, etc, that exert a significant amount of influence over national leaders, including our President. These people have significant financial or geopolitical interests that may be put at risk by certain political policies, and when threatened, they have the channels or connections to impact policy. Is it some secret society, like the Illuminati? I don't think so. But it is not far fetched to believe that there are some very powerful people that hold immense political sway.
 
I truly believe that there is a loosely tied network of industrialists, oil magnates, bankers, political operatives, etc, that exert a significant amount of influence over national leaders, including our President. These people have significant financial or geopolitical interests that may be put at risk by certain political policies, and when threatened, they have the channels or connections to impact policy. Is it some secret society, like the Illuminati? I don't think so. But it is not far fetched to believe that there are some very powerful people that hold immense political sway.

My only issue with that is that most of those parties have opposite interests. Why would oil magnates allow BHO to waste billions in green energy and have other countries worrying about the bad effects of fossil fuels? Since they control BHO that should mean they control other countries as well right? Why allow Bush to go into Iraqi and then have BHO just abandon it? Why let Russia take over Syria? Why are interest rates so low when banks could make much more money with higher rates? I don't think these entities have as much control as most people think. They surely have almost no control over Russia, China and the Middle East.
 
Obama doesn't make ANY decisions...

say it with me now....Obama doesn't make ANY decisions.

he's a well spoken pretty Afro American puppet....y'all hating him so much is silly.....

you REALLY think they let him "decide " a damn thing?

it is to laugh......

Oh that is funny. But Booooshhh made every decision, don't you remember?

What are the odds on this being a selective argument, selectively used only to try to defend horrible Democratic Presidents?
 
My only issue with that is that most of those parties have opposite interests. Why would oil magnates allow BHO to waste billions in green energy and have other countries worrying about the bad effects of fossil fuels? Since they control BHO that should mean they control other countries as well right? Why allow Bush to go into Iraqi and then have BHO just abandon it? Why let Russia take over Syria? Why are interest rates so low when banks could make much more money with higher rates? I don't think these entities have as much control as most people think. They surely have almost no control over Russia, China and the Middle East.
I guess I liken it to the five NY mob families. They have competing interests, but sometimes letting the other guy have his keeps the peace, and is good for the whole. That, and politicians are always juggling competing interests.
 
I guess I liken it to the five NY mob families. They have competing interests, but sometimes letting the other guy have his keeps the peace, and is good for the whole. That, and politicians are always juggling competing interests.

Never made sense to me. I get what you are saying but I don't see that in the real world. The 5 mob family are all mob families and can divvy out things. Helping one doesn't necessarily hurt the other. With banks, oil, industrialists etc... you can't help one without hurting the other in some cases. Everybody thought private unions were running the show years ago. Now most of them are gone. So did they really control things? Why would banks allow onerous rules and regulations during the past 6 years? It doesn't help the industrialists nor the oil people. Who exactly does it help? It hurts almost everyone. Just like most liberal ideas.

Not only that but why does BHO care anyway? He isn't up for re-election and he is just doing what he wants. I don't see anyone controlling him that way. He's the one responsible because he's making the rules.
 
Last edited:
Oh that is funny. But Booooshhh made every decision, don't you remember?

What are the odds on this being a selective argument, selectively used only to try to defend horrible Democratic Presidents?
I ain't defending nothing, Hoss...sure sounds like you are though.....W was just as much a puppet...why do you think he had to have Cheney hold his dick over 9-11 when it came time to do the 'splainin'?
 
Why let Russia take over Syria?

Let? Who's going to stop them?


Saudis and Russia agree to cooperate in Syria.

1023955733.jpg


Russia’s military strength has apparently impressed Saudi Arabia.

The new Saudi defense minister agreed with Russian President Vladimir Putin that both countries should cooperate in Syria

Russia and Saudi Arabia have surprisingly agreed on establishing closer coordination in Syria despite a number of disagreements. A meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and the new Saudi Defense Minister Mohammed bin Salman al-Saud took place in Sochi.

After the talks, Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Dschubeir said that his country is in favor of a dialogue between the current Syrian government and the opposition and that it would support the idea of a transitional government in the war-torn country.

Thus, the Saudis have given up their plan to immediately overthrow Syrian President Bashar-al-Assad, which can be considered a great achievement

http://sputniknews.com/politics/20151012/1028397831/saudi-arabia-gives-up-resistance.html
 
Let? Who's going to stop them?


Saudis and Russia agree to cooperate in Syria.

1023955733.jpg


Russia’s military strength has apparently impressed Saudi Arabia.

The new Saudi defense minister agreed with Russian President Vladimir Putin that both countries should cooperate in Syria

Russia and Saudi Arabia have surprisingly agreed on establishing closer coordination in Syria despite a number of disagreements. A meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and the new Saudi Defense Minister Mohammed bin Salman al-Saud took place in Sochi.

After the talks, Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Dschubeir said that his country is in favor of a dialogue between the current Syrian government and the opposition and that it would support the idea of a transitional government in the war-torn country.

Thus, the Saudis have given up their plan to immediately overthrow Syrian President Bashar-al-Assad, which can be considered a great achievement

http://sputniknews.com/politics/20151012/1028397831/saudi-arabia-gives-up-resistance.html

Syria, Egypt, and Jordan are all Russian client states. At one time so was Iraq. Ivan has always held influence over them.
 
Obama refuses to give up on his Muslim Brotherhood


U.S. delivers 50 tons of ammunition to Syria rebel groups


U.S. military cargo planes gave 50 tons of ammunition to rebel groups overnight in northern Syria, using an air drop of 112 pallets as the first step in the Obama Administration's urgent effort to find new ways to support those groups

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/12/politics/syria-rebel-groups-ammunition-50-tons/
 
More Obama backed terrorists checking in.


Syria Rebels Plan Suicide Attacks on Russians

After more than a week of Russian aerial attacks, Syrian rebels plan to hit back with double agents and suicide bombers.

“First, we will endure the violent aerial bombardment, then move to weaken Russia by all means available, such as recruiting agents in the ranks of the regime to provide us with the movements of the Russians and the regime,” Capt. Rashid al-Hourani, from the rebel Homs Liberation Movement

The Homs Liberation Movement — a division of the U.S.-backed Free Syrian Army — seems ready to use tactics associated with ISIS. “We will conduct martyrdom operations carried out by dissident officers,” al-Hourani said, using a euphemism for suicide attacks.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/12/syria-rebels-plan-suicide-attacks-on-russians.html

----------------------

The Russians need to rubblize mostly all of Syria
 
Obama refuses to give up on his Muslim Brotherhood


U.S. delivers 50 tons of ammunition to Syria rebel groups


U.S. military cargo planes gave 50 tons of ammunition to rebel groups overnight in northern Syria, using an air drop of 112 pallets as the first step in the Obama Administration's urgent effort to find new ways to support those groups

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/12/politics/syria-rebel-groups-ammunition-50-tons/

In related news ISIS was pleasantly surprised when 112 pallets containing 50 tons of ammunition landed gently in their camp overnight.
 
In related news ISIS was pleasantly surprised when 112 pallets containing 50 tons of ammunition landed gently in their camp overnight.

yeah - I should have changed that headline to: ISIS receives 50 tons of ammo from Obama.
 
one more reason to vote for Trump...

http://conservativetribune.com/alert-trump-reveals-greatest/

Donald Trump recently entered the Syrian refugee debate and had some bold things to say about the crisis.

The Republican presidential front runner spoke with Fox News’ Eric Bolling on Cashin’ In about the issue. During the interview, Trump expressed his deep concern about potentially letting jihadists come into the country as “refugees.”

“They were talking about 3,000 people coming,” he told Bolling. “Then I heard 10 [thousand], then I heard 25 [thousand], then I heard 200,000 people.”

“And Eric, if you look at this migration, it’s mostly men,” Trump said. “And they look like young men, and strong men, and they look like fighters.”

Trump said he wondered “why aren’t they fighting for their own country — Syria?”

He went on to say, “This could be one of the greatest military coups of all time.” Trump obviously wasn’t talking about a domestic military overthrow of the government, but a surprise attack from a foreign enemy, as indicated when he said, “Some of [the immigrants] definitely in my opinion will be ISIS.”

Trump warned that accepting refugees in our attempt at humanitarianism could be like accepting “a Trojan horse.” Many migrants, including Islamic militants, would come to an unprepared United States.

He further pointed out that the United States is a “debtor nation” that owes $19 trillion, and our infrastructure is outdated.

“Obama wants to bring 200,000 people here,” Trump said. “f I win the election, they are going back. They’re going back.”

Under a Trump administration, instead of transferring these migrants to European countries or the U.S., “free zones, safe zones” would be set up in Syria for these people.

Trump pointed out that the Persian Gulf states aren’t “accepting anybody.”

“And they are right there,” he said. “We have a big problem in this country.”
 
Top