• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Transgenderism - A Thread of Its Own

How so? I posted this simple fact. Check the numbers. I completely oppose having men participate in women's sports. 100% opposed to it. I am simply pointing out what an absolute cynical farce the MAGA culture wars are, in reality. It's pure, unbridled performance politics. Approximately 1.0% of the US population is transgender, but listening to MAGA blowhards, you'd think we're dealing with an imminent, round-the-clock threat. So yeah, in your mind, this somehow makes me a communist, or a fascist, or someone who supports such things. Yet another example how far down the rabbit hole you folks are. Not sure there's a rope long enough that we can throw you, to bring you back to reason and sanity.


View attachment 18061
all commies are not transgender, but all transgenders are democrats and by guilt of association, commies.

you miserably fail to see what is happening here, in this country. you fail to see that there is a upward rise in the not just the increase in socialist leaning democrat politician candidates, and sitting democrats leaning to socialism, but also the policies that are being created and pushed that will, 100% change the very fabric of this country from one your grandparents (and, likewise mine and others here) fought to preserve and keep off intact so that insufferable ******** like you can physically grow up in safe spaces and turn around to help usher in the very evils that they fought against.

your snarky responses only show how much you know about exactly nothing in this country. yes, you have relatives and friends here who likely tell you what you want to hear so they can get back to their own lives. the politicians you've publicly declared fealty for are the very ones who have helped push identity politics (which divides us), a loosely secured border (which endangers us) and calls for disarming us while also taxing us more and more. Which is a-ok with you since you do not live here and do not have to face the burden of those consequences from your secured country.

communism is a cancer and like cancer, if you kill it off quickly enough it will not fully spread and kill the host.
 
Close, but no cigar, Lebanon. 🔎
NO. THEY have openly called themselves Communists and many have openly called for or approved of the seizing of the means of production. Communism and Socialism have some minor IN THEORY but in practice they are two sides of the same coin. They are openly quoting Marxist manifesto's. Once more this isn't McCarthyism this is their own words and they are proud of it.
 
Close, but no cigar, Lebanon. 🔎
and your beloved democratic socialist politicians have no idea how slippery their slope is.
 
yes, you have relatives and friends here who likely tell you what you want to hear so they can get back to their own lives.

Lolz, my relatives and friends stateside are all hardcore MAGAs. :unsure:🤷‍♂️
 
NO. THEY have openly called themselves Communists and many have openly called for or approved of the seizing of the means of production. Communism and Socialism have some minor IN THEORY but in practice they are two sides of the same coin. They are openly quoting Marxist manifesto's. Once more this isn't McCarthyism this is their own words and they are proud of it.

The only one interested in seizing the means of production has been Trump, seeing his absolute criminality with crypto, appeasing tech bro oligarchs, and government bailouts in various industries.
 
Close, but no cigar, Lebanon. 🔎
There is in functional reality no such thing as a democratic socialism. It is simply a euphemism for Socialism meant to fool the weak-minded overly emotional masses. Simply read the DSA's own platform and you will see there is nothing remotely consistent with our Constitution there.
 
The only one interested in seizing the means of production has been Trump, seeing his absolute criminality with crypto, appeasing tech bro oligarchs, and government bailouts in various industries.
Come on Tibs I give you more credit than this. Get over your TDS and look at the facts presented by the very people we are discussing, you are defending people who are blatantly telling you they want to do this and call themselves Communists. Trump is irrelevant to this discussion.
 
NO. THEY have openly called themselves Communists

Just to give you a sense how ridiculous Trump & MAGAs are screaming about Communists!!

Implementing a full Soviet-style communist system in the United States would require a complete, foundational overhaul of the nation's political, legal, economic, and social structures. Because the U.S. Constitution and its current institutions are explicitly designed to protect private property, individual rights, and a separation of powers, such a transformation could not happen through standard legislative reforms.
Here is a breakdown of what it would take to establish a Soviet-type system in the U.S.:

1. Political Overhaul
    • Abolition of the Constitution: The current U.S. Constitution would need to be completely replaced or nullified, as it guarantees private property rights, free speech, and a multi-party democratic process.
    • Single-Party State: The multi-party system would be banned, establishing the Communist Party as the sole, vanguard political organization with absolute authority over the government.]
    • The Soviet Structure: The federal government, presidency, and Congress would be replaced by a hierarchical network of "soviets" (workers' councils). Local councils would elect regional councils, culminating in a Supreme Soviet at the national level.
    • Democratic Centralism: Freedom of dissent within government organs would be eliminated. Once the central party leadership makes a decision, all lower bodies and citizens must follow it bindingly.

2. Economic Restructuring
    • Total Nationalization: The state would seize all private industries, corporate assets, financial institutions, and natural resources without compensation to the owners.
    • Abolition of Private Property: Private ownership of land, real estate, and factories would be outlawed. Citizens would only be allowed personal property (such as clothes or household goods).
    • Command Economy: Market mechanisms, supply and demand, and Wall Street would be abolished. A centralized state planning agency (a U.S. equivalent to Gosplan) would dictate what goods are produced, in what quantities, and at what fixed prices.
    • Collectivization of Agriculture: All private farming, corporate agriculture, and food supply chains would be federalized into state-run farms or collective agricultural communities.
    • Elimination of Independent Labor Unions: Current independent unions would be dissolved or absorbed into a single, state-controlled labor apparatus meant to enforce production quotas rather than bargain for workers' rights.

3. Legal and Judicial Transformation
    • Replacement of the Judiciary: The Supreme Court and the independent judicial system would be dismantled. Courts would be converted into instruments of the party to enforce ideological conformity and state security.
    • Rewriting the Legal Code: Laws protecting corporate rights, contracts, and inheritance would be erased, replaced by laws prioritizing the collective interest of the state over the individual.

4. Ideological and Social Control
    • State Monopoly on Information: All independent media outlets, internet platforms, and publishing houses would be nationalized. Strict state censorship would ensure all public information aligns with Marxist-Leninist ideology.
    • Establishment of a Security Apparatus: A massive domestic intelligence agency (similar to the KGB) would be required to suppress counter-revolutionary movements, political dissent, and underground capitalist markets.
    • Secularization: State policy would actively promote state atheism, stripping religious organizations of their tax-exempt status, nationalizing church properties, and removing religious influences from public life.

5. Practical Implementation Challenges
    • Civilian and Military Resistance: Given the deeply ingrained culture of individualism, private enterprise, and the Second Amendment (widespread private firearm ownership), attempting to forcibly nationalize the country would almost certainly trigger a massive civil war or severe societal collapse.
    • Geopolitical Realignment: The U.S. would have to withdraw from all global capitalist trade networks, treaties, and international financial institutions (like the IMF and World Bank), completely upending the global economy.

But we're veering off course in this thread. Back to "Transgenders" and what a massive, imminent threat they are to Americans.
 
But we're veering off course in this thread. Back to "Transgenders" and what a massive, imminent threat they are to Americans.
so you jumped the rails, got called on your bullshiite muslims and now want to avoid the asskicking SIL was laying on you.

yes, back to your supporting grown men playing dress up and jerking off in the bathroom where little girls are in the next stall.
 
There is in functional reality no such thing as a democratic socialism. It is simply a euphemism for Socialism meant to fool the weak-minded overly emotional masses. Simply read the DSA's own platform and you will see there is nothing remotely consistent with our Constitution there.
or hear their own words?

 
so you jumped the rails, got called on your bullshiite muslims and now want to avoid the asskicking SIL was laying on you.

Tell me, Oh, Wise One, how and when will Communism be implemented in the United States.

yes, back to your supporting grown men playing dress up and jerking off in the bathroom where little girls are in the next stall.

And you can **** right off with this crap. You bring up "playing dress up" and "jerking off in a bathroom with little girls around" so often, it wouldn't shock me if you were a transgender sex freak yourself. It seems to be always on your mind.
 

Who is Julie Tetart? Meet the French transgender basketball player who wants to join the WNBA amid Sophie Cunningham controversy​


Julie Tetart knows exactly what people want to ask.

Clocking in at an imposing 6’3″, the French basketball standout just wrapped up one of the most dominant individual seasons in recent memory, leading France’s second-tier Ligue 2 in both scoring and rebounding while collecting three major individual awards. But as talk surrounding transgender participation in women’s sports continues to dominate WNBA headlines, her on-court production isn’t the only thing drawing attention.

Tetart, who publicly came out as transgender in 2021, recently acknowledged that reaching the WNBA is still a lifelong ambition—even if she doesn’t believe it’s likely to ever happen.

If they contact me, I won’t say no,” Tetart told OutKick. “But you have to be realistic: I’m old, and there are far better players than me.

When asked why she believed a move to the WNBA wasn’t realistic, Tetart offered another revealing answer.

The league, yes. The country, no.

The timing of those comments is hard to ignore.

Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham has become one of the league’s most talked-about players after reiterating her belief that women’s sports should remain reserved for biological women.

I got a lot of negative feedback about me ‘hating trans.’ And I’m like, ‘I never once said that,‘” Cunningham told ESPN last month.

I think that I am here to extend love. But I also think with that love is truth, being honest. And I want to protect young girls in a locker room, or young girls in sport who shouldn’t have to go against biological men.

The comments have triggered days of debate across the basketball world, drawing responses from fellow players, coaches, commentators, and fans. Minnesota Lynx head coach Cheryl Reeve even wore a “Trans Kids Belong” shirt during Sunday’s game against the Fever, while ESPN cameras captured an animated pregame conversation between Reeve and Cunningham that quickly went viral.

Dominant Season Keeps Julie Tetart In The Spotlight​

Long before her WNBA comments made headlines, Tetart had already put together a season impossible to overlook.

The 34-year-old center averaged 21 points and 20 rebounds per game for Monaco while finishing atop Ligue 2 in both categories. One performance stood out above the rest: a remarkable 21-point, 30-rebound outing in March that became one of the most eye-catching stat lines of the French season.

MVP voting didn’t go her way. That didn’t stop Tetart from taking home Player of the Year, Defensive Player of the Year and Domestic Player of the Year after one of the league’s most productive seasons.

Not everyone believes those accomplishments should translate into an opportunity in the WNBA.

Former French international Audrey Sauret has argued that allowing transgender athletes to compete in women’s professional leagues creates an uneven playing field.

Ligue 2 serves as a kind of testing ground,” Sauret said earlier this year. “By allowing them to participate in professional competitions, we create unfair competition, especially for younger players.

She added that hormone treatment does not erase biological differences and warned the issue should have been addressed much sooner.

Tetart, meanwhile, has largely stayed away from interacting directly with Cunningham’s comments, tacitly acknowledging that the “league” and, on a larger scale, the culture of the “country” is standing in the way of her WNBA dream.

Asked whether she had a response to the Fever guard’s position, she answered with a single word: “Aucun”—French for “none.”

That brief response hasn’t stopped her name from becoming part of the wider conversation.

Tetart may have kept her answer short, but the timing guarantees people will keep talking, whether she wants them to or not. The French star’s jaw-dropping dominance and WNBA aspirations have fell squarely in the middle of the league’s biggest off-court debate.
 
Tell me, Oh, Wise One, how and when will Communism be implemented in the United States.



And you can **** right off with this crap. You bring up "playing dress up" and "jerking off in a bathroom with little girls around" so often, it wouldn't shock me if you were a transgender sex freak yourself. It seems to be always on your mind.
hopefully it never gets implemented here. but history repeats itself and your beloved Democrats continue to whitewash history, so who knows.

i won't apologize for putting it front and center another horrible hill - transgenders in women's restrooms - that your beloved Democrats continue to want to die on.
 
Tibs seems more unhinged than usual. I wonder if everything is okay.
maybe his bridge was repaved and wifi is spottier than usual?

1785961913983.png
 
Crazy times in America. I just hope Trump can weed out all the Communists, and arrest all the journalists, before things get out of hand. :rolleyes:


View attachment 18059
2 different topics, shall we discuss them separately like sane adults?

Do i want the police to use flock cameras to stalk women? My answer is no.
Do I want trans athletes in youth sports? My answer is again no.

Your turn.
 
Quick question, should be easy.

Who won the Democrat nomination for US Senator in Michigan yesterday?

What is his platform, his beliefs and public comments?
 
Lolz, my relatives and friends stateside are all hardcore MAGAs. :unsure:🤷‍♂️
Probably because they have common sense and respect for your ancestors who fought against communism, unlike you on both counts. I’m betting you’re not missed at Thanksgiving.
 
Once again, I had to check the thread title to see what the hell we're supposed to be discussing.

This isn't 3rd grade intramural kickball where all the kids in Mrs. Smith's class take on all the kids In Miss Jones class.

We're talking fully grown or nearly fully grown biological men pretending to be women, period, and the effect that has on women athletes.
 
2 different topics, shall we discuss them separately like sane adults?

Do i want the police to use flock cameras to stalk women? My answer is no.
Do I want trans athletes in youth sports? My answer is again no.

Your turn.


Do i want the police to use flock cameras to stalk women? My answer is absolutely not.
Do I want trans athletes in youth sports? My answer is absolutely not.

Glad we got that out of the way.
 
Do i want the police to use flock cameras to stalk women? My answer is absolutely not.
Do I want trans athletes in youth sports? My answer is absolutely not.

Glad we got that out of the way.
So trannies in the Olympics, WNBA, LPGA, UFC etc…. Is perfectly fine. Got it. Freak.
 
So trannies in the Olympics, WNBA, LPGA, UFC etc…. Is perfectly fine. Got it. Freak.

No, bozo. I'd ban all men/trans from all women's sports across the board, now and forevermore. You can go crawl back into your dank cave now, dragging your knuckles.
 
Do i want the police to use flock cameras to stalk women? My answer is absolutely not.
Do I want trans athletes in youth sports? My answer is absolutely not.

Glad we got that out of the way.
OK, then what was your point in posting that in the first place?

Do you believe it's OK for biological men to compete with biological women in high school, college and at the professional level?

My answer for obvious reasons would be a resounding no.
 
Top