• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

That's Jizzers job, damn it.
iu

Sorry folks...
 
he's 67. yes, that is getting up there, but the man is not feeble by any means. @Ron Burgundy is close to that dude's age, and Ron is in shape, but not in Olympian shape. I'm fairly certain that Ron could reach down to 18" and jack around with something at foot level. And if it was pulling up, do tell why he decided to pull it. It wasn't a glory hole, so he had no business pulling on something there. Like I said, common sense aint so common anymore. Seems you're showing that you lack that trait as well.
I spend so much time in the gym that they gave me a part-time job.

 
Arrests are public records, dipshit.

That's categorically false. We can point to tens of thousands of examples where crimes and arrests have been made where the perps are not identified for a myriad of reasons.

In the United States, an arrest does not automatically mean the person's name will be made public, although in many cases it does become publicly available through government records. It depends on the jurisdiction, the type of offense, and applicable laws.
  • Police blotters and arrest logs: Many police departments and sheriff's offices routinely publish the names of people who have been arrested, along with the charges, date, and location. Others publish only limited information or nothing at all.
  • Jail records: If someone is booked into a county or city jail, their booking information—including their name, mugshot (where permitted), charges, and bond amount—is often a public record. Some jurisdictions no longer release mugshots routinely due to privacy laws.
  • Court records: Once charges are filed in court, the defendant's name is generally part of the public court record unless the case has been sealed.
  • Juveniles: Arrests involving minors are typically confidential, with exceptions for certain serious crimes or when a juvenile is charged as an adult.
  • Protected or sealed cases:Some arrests may not be publicly disclosed if:
    • the records are sealed by a court,
    • the arrest involves certain protected victims or witnesses,
    • disclosure would compromise an ongoing investigation,
    • state law limits release of the information.
  • Federal arrests: Federal agencies often announce significant arrests through press releases, but many federal arrests receive no public announcement beyond the court records.
You are this stupid.

Please come back tomorrow and entertain us further Jester.

giphy.gif
 
No, that would be you. You even fantasized about his grip strength.

Not as scapegoats for a pathetic baby who can admit his failures.
1 - point to where I “fantasized about his grip strength”. You can’t. I never said it. Looky there. Another L to add to your collection. Loser.

2 - did Trump arrest these “scapegoats”? Show the video or photos. Looky there. Another L to add to your collection. Loser.
 
Arrests are public records, dipshit. They’ve made this a spectacle. Why not reveal the names and charges?
You mean, like the J6ers? Like that?
 
1 - point to where I “fantasized about his grip strength”. You can’t. I never said it. Looky there. Another L to add to your collection. Loser.

2 - did Trump arrest these “scapegoats”? Show the video or photos. Looky there. Another L to add to your collection. Loser.

Ummm....

1783564690981.png
 
That's categorically false. We can point to tens of thousands of examples where crimes and arrests have been made where the perps are not identified for a myriad of reasons.

In the United States, an arrest does not automatically mean the person's name will be made public, although in many cases it does become publicly available through government records. It depends on the jurisdiction, the type of offense, and applicable laws.
  • Police blotters and arrest logs: Many police departments and sheriff's offices routinely publish the names of people who have been arrested, along with the charges, date, and location. Others publish only limited information or nothing at all.
  • Jail records: If someone is booked into a county or city jail, their booking information—including their name, mugshot (where permitted), charges, and bond amount—is often a public record. Some jurisdictions no longer release mugshots routinely due to privacy laws.
  • Court records: Once charges are filed in court, the defendant's name is generally part of the public court record unless the case has been sealed.
  • Juveniles: Arrests involving minors are typically confidential, with exceptions for certain serious crimes or when a juvenile is charged as an adult.
  • Protected or sealed cases:Some arrests may not be publicly disclosed if:
    • the records are sealed by a court,
    • the arrest involves certain protected victims or witnesses,
    • disclosure would compromise an ongoing investigation,
    • state law limits release of the information.
  • Federal arrests: Federal agencies often announce significant arrests through press releases, but many federal arrests receive no public announcement beyond the court records.
You are this stupid.

Please come back tomorrow and entertain us further Jester.

giphy.gif
Thanks for confirming that generally arrest/ are public records. Now, what is the reason they are withholding the charges and names of the others but not the bicyclist? Thought so.
 
1 - point to where I “fantasized about his grip strength”. You can’t. I never said it. Looky there. Another L to add to your collection. Loser.
You literally explained why he would (supposedly) be able to perform an act of strength mere mortals could not. Weird.
2 - did Trump arrest these “scapegoats”? Show the video or photos. Looky there. Another L to add to your collection. Loser.
He instructed people to find people. You know he did.
 
You literally explained why he would (supposedly) be able to perform an act of strength mere mortals could not. Weird.

He instructed people to find people. You know he did.
uh, no. that was your ASSumption. Here is precisely what I said:
1783611056177.png

The National Park Service arrested those people. oh, and btw:


An incident of alleged vandalism involving a "sharp knife or razor" used to cut caulk at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was revealed in a federal court filing overnight -- an incident that happened shortly after the rehabbed structure was filled again with water.

According to a declaration by Deputy Director for the National Park Service Frank Lands, "On June 9, 2026, after the rehabilitation project was substantially complete, the U.S. Park Police responded to an NPS report of damage to the reflecting pool, including a caulk over the foam sealant that was cut with a sharp knife or razor and destruction of delaminating surface material. In addition, approximately 70 fence post tops were thrown into the pool."

I know you do not understand a goddamned thing, so let me slow walk this for you.

if the caulk was cut - as is alleged - then the seal between the liner and the pool surface can thus be compromised. This could result in the liner becoming loose (caulk is used to secure or seal things) and allowing the liner to then ... get this ... become unstable and possibly float upwards.

its already been said here that the liner was "floating" or at the surface of the pool. even then, it's federal property.

(this is where you go off on some wild tangent, counting the paragraphs of this, or even characters in the response and claim a victory)

get over it. You're in a cuLt. Take another L. Loser.

1783611425577.png
 
uh, no. that was your ASSumption. Here is precisely what I said:
View attachment 17793

The National Park Service arrested those people. oh, and btw:




I know you do not understand a goddamned thing, so let me slow walk this for you.

if the caulk was cut - as is alleged - then the seal between the liner and the pool surface can thus be compromised. This could result in the liner becoming loose (caulk is used to secure or seal things) and allowing the liner to then ... get this ... become unstable and possibly float upwards.

its already been said here that the liner was "floating" or at the surface of the pool. even then, it's federal property.

(this is where you go off on some wild tangent, counting the paragraphs of this, or even characters in the response and claim a victory)

get over it. You're in a cuLt. Take another L. Loser.

View attachment 17794
😂 A sharp knife or razor or something!
 
Are any of them among the ones that have been arrested for sex crimes against minors since Trump’s pardon?
so you want to arrest people in advance of crimes committed?
special kind of retard, aintcha?

you're in a cuLt. take the L.

1783611733388.png
 
uh, no. that was your ASSumption. Here is precisely what I said:
View attachment 17793

The National Park Service arrested those people. oh, and btw:




I know you do not understand a goddamned thing, so let me slow walk this for you.

if the caulk was cut - as is alleged - then the seal between the liner and the pool surface can thus be compromised. This could result in the liner becoming loose (caulk is used to secure or seal things) and allowing the liner to then ... get this ... become unstable and possibly float upwards.

its already been said here that the liner was "floating" or at the surface of the pool. even then, it's federal property.

(this is where you go off on some wild tangent, counting the paragraphs of this, or even characters in the response and claim a victory)

get over it. You're in a cuLt. Take another L. Loser.

View attachment 17794
Someonce in the industry mentioned a theory about the seams expanding and contracting causing the sealant / liner to crack. This seems much more plausible than someone jumping in the water and cutting big sections of whatever. If they really had evidence of people cutting the pool they would plaster it all over. There would be videos of people in the pool cutting it up. They wouldn't have to show faces or names just bodies in the water doing something. Trump would love to show the world TDSers actually vandalizing something. The park service is going to say whatever Trump tells them to say. Trump just makes these grand statements all the time with no proof and expects people to forget about them in a couple weeks. I guess it is genius in a way because people will believe anything and society has very short term memory.
 
Someonce in the industry mentioned a theory about the seams expanding and contracting causing the sealant / liner to crack. This seems much more plausible than someone jumping in the water and cutting big sections of whatever. If they really had evidence of people cutting the pool they would plaster it all over. There would be videos of people in the pool cutting it up. They wouldn't have to show faces or names just bodies in the water doing something. Trump would love to show the world TDSers actually vandalizing something. The park service is going to say whatever Trump tells them to say. Trump just makes these grand statements all the time with no proof and expects people to forget about them in a couple weeks. I guess it is genius in a way because people will believe anything and society has very short term memory.
"Someone" is everywhere. Your "plausible" theory could also be in conjunction with someone cutting the caulk.

Are you trying to join Flog's cute LittLe group?
 
Top