• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Transgenderism - A Thread of Its Own

No ding ding. You and Stupe defend child rapists getting six month sentences or being paroled or pedophilia being covered up. Ask MTG.
you make as much sense as a paper sponge.

we "defend child rapists" and should "ask MTG"?

first off - any proven child rapist should be immediately drawn and slowly quartered while being stoned and tarred and feathered. A,N.Y.
is that clear enough? i dont agree with using taxpayer money to house, feed, clothe and board the lowest of criminals. so read that again. any proven child rapist should be immediately drawn and slowly quartered while being stoned and tarred and feathered. A,N.Y. there's not a loophole in that statement.

second - per your flogic, which as we always know, is 100% flawed, if "we" defend something, why would we "ask" anyone else? including an elected politician? i've made it known I do not trust any career politician. none of them. unlike... you. but, to ask someone else why i defend something (which, per my statement above, I do not), makes zero sense and actually lowers the abysmal standard of flogic.

it's been said too many times, but you absolutely pfucking suck at this.
 
You've lost the argument when you have to continually "make up" things others supposedly have said or done.

You won't find @Superman or I defending any rapist, from the cloth to bearded, nose-ring wearing purple hairs, on this board.

What's your next spin?

giphy.gif


PS...again, your method of whataboutism is pretty sick and twisted: "If I can just point out one or two people on the Right who raped kids, I can justify/normalize Trans rapists/voyeurs/exhibitionists/school shooters"
One or two? 😂
 
you make as much sense as a paper sponge.

we "defend child rapists" and should "ask MTG"?

first off - any proven child rapist should be immediately drawn and slowly quartered while being stoned and tarred and feathered. A,N.Y.
is that clear enough? i dont agree with using taxpayer money to house, feed, clothe and board the lowest of criminals. so read that again. any proven child rapist should be immediately drawn and slowly quartered while being stoned and tarred and feathered. A,N.Y. there's not a loophole in that statement.

second - per your flogic, which as we always know, is 100% flawed, if "we" defend something, why would we "ask" anyone else? including an elected politician? i've made it known I do not trust any career politician. none of them. unlike... you. but, to ask someone else why i defend something (which, per my statement above, I do not), makes zero sense and actually lowers the abysmal standard of flogic.

it's been said too many times, but you absolutely pfucking suck at this.
No, you trust Trump and choose to believe that he’s not a rapist, he just brags about sexually assaulting women.
 
One or two? 😂

So you agree your whatabouism play is in fact to dismiss any scrutiny of deviant/violent trans and allow them to continue as is.

Thanks for the confession.
 
No, you trust Trump and choose to believe that he’s not a rapist, he just brags about sexually assaulting women.
let's go slow and break this down...

is Trump a "career" politician? How many offices has he held? how many times has he been elected? was he ever a mayor? governor? has he held any elected title other than YOUR President?
 
let's go slow and break this down...

is Trump a "career" politician? How many offices has he held? how many times has he been elected? was he ever a mayor? governor? has he held any elected title other than YOUR President?
Con men are politicians, he’s been one all his life. He’s probably been a rapist and pedophile all of his adult life because whenever someone calls him such, he never sues.
 
Con men are politicians, he’s been one all his life. He’s probably been a rapist and pedophile all of his adult life because whenever someone calls him such, he never sues.
You've been called things on here, and have yet to sue. Hmmmm
 
Con men are politicians, he’s been one all his life. He’s probably been a rapist and pedophile all of his adult life because whenever someone calls him such, he never sues.
he's been a con man or a politician? so you're saying Pelosi, Obama, Biden, AOC, Schumer, Swalwell and every Democrat are con artists.

about time you came to that reality.

as for Trump suing - he'd been a private individual (albeit very public) forever. private meaning like you. and me. and everyone else on this board. you simply have zero way to know who he's sued, how many times he's filed lawsuits, how many of those lawsuits were dismissed via arbitration or ... well ... nothing about the man. Except for what you digest from the cackling hens on The View.

if i'm wrong, then post the number of times he's sued for libel or defamation. BTW - the New York Times was sued by Trump. Even if a liberal judge tossed it "for its contents" - which you can read about here, as I'm not spoon feeding you.

here's another lawsuit tossed by a liberal judge:

oh, but wait...

ABC and Stephanopolous ruled to pay Trump $15 mil

And those are only the lawsuits found on a quick google search. certainly you, with your oversized cranium housing two gray brain cells can find more to back up YOUR claim that:
he never sues

I'm not even going to address your wishful "probably" since exactly zero has been legitimately connected to the man.
 
he's been a con man or a politician? so you're saying Pelosi, Obama, Biden, AOC, Schumer, Swalwell and every Democrat are con artists.

about time you came to that reality.

as for Trump suing - he'd been a private individual (albeit very public) forever. private meaning like you. and me. and everyone else on this board. you simply have zero way to know who he's sued, how many times he's filed lawsuits, how many of those lawsuits were dismissed via arbitration or ... well ... nothing about the man. Except for what you digest from the cackling hens on The View.

if i'm wrong, then post the number of times he's sued for libel or defamation. BTW - the New York Times was sued by Trump. Even if a liberal judge tossed it "for its contents" - which you can read about here, as I'm not spoon feeding you.

here's another lawsuit tossed by a liberal judge:

oh, but wait...

ABC and Stephanopolous ruled to pay Trump $15 mil

And those are only the lawsuits found on a quick google search. certainly you, with your oversized cranium housing two gray brain cells can find more to back up YOUR claim that:


I'm not even going to address your wishful "probably" since exactly zero has been legitimately connected to the man.
😂 When two sentences get a nine paragraph response, the last of which starts with “I’m not even going to address”, it time to take the L. You’re protesting too much.
 
😂 When two sentences get a nine paragraph response, the last of which starts with “I’m not even going to address”, it time to take the L. You’re protesting too much.
You’re even Lower IQ than a retarded Somalian.
 
just further proof that when you respond to Flog and use more than one or two multi-syllabic words, ze's gerbil brain shuts down. Ze can parrot the absolute pfuck out of talking points, but cannot defend them. ever.
 
Not at all.

It is.

It's literally exactly what you are doing. Trans deviants are everywhere in the news, so you point to one white, religious dude to say "see, it's everywhere" - translation, leave the trans deviants alone.

"Look squirrel!"

A child's strategy.
 
Hmmmm, have a look....

Transgender pedo ‘witch’ who filmed his own 7-year-old daughter demands to conduct nude Wiccan rituals in NJ women’s prison

A twisted transgender pedophile is demanding his women’s prison allow him to conduct Wiccan rituals in the nude in the prison yard.

Marina Volz, 37, a biological male born Matthew, is serving a 25-year sentence at the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women in Clinton, N.J. for filming sadistic pornography of his own 7-year-old daughter


"Yeah, but did you hear about the Catholic Priest in Sioux Falls who fondled a little boy in 1987??!!?" //Flogged

I've pointed it out before, but it bears repeating again:

1779032169869.png
 
It is.

It's literally exactly what you are doing. Trans deviants are everywhere in the news, so you point to one white, religious dude to say "see, it's everywhere" - translation, leave the trans deviants alone.

"Look squirrel!"

A child's strategy.
Nope. You’re believing what you want to believe and ignoring that which you do not.
 
Nope. You’re believing what you want to believe and ignoring that which you do not.
So you quite literally dispute the absolute claims and verified reports of trans people committing sex crimes.
 
Top