- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,610
- Reaction score
- 6,923
- Points
- 113
Yes it is. The Clinton’s testified. Bondi refused. So will Blanche and Trump and Melania. Why?interesting.
Not what you were asked.
Yes it is. The Clinton’s testified. Bondi refused. So will Blanche and Trump and Melania. Why?interesting.
Not what you were asked.
Trump doesn’t strike me as altruistic. If anything he fears the others will bring anyone and everyone down with them.He doesn’t necessarily have to be running cover for himself. He could be doing it for his millionaire and billionaire friends. It’s one or the other. Maybe both. Either way, I’m tired of this crap. It needs to come out.
even more interesting is that in six, going on seven pages now, you've not called for a curb on gun violence or stricter gun laws.Trump doesn’t strike me as altruistic. If anything he fears the others will bring anyone and everyone down with them.
For having to endure hoax after hoax, it would be quite normal behavior for Trump to call this a hoax as well.Seriously? Compare the behavior of Trump over the past year to the other names found in the files. Maybe they’re sweating bullets but Trump is the only one alternately demanding an end to the investigation and calling it a hoax. Odd behavior for someone with nothing to hide.
Trump, Bondi and Blanche stopped at “now there isn’t a list, well there is, but there’s nothing to see and you’ll have to take our word for it” and you obeyed.
And then the warning:“When our government does nothing to stop federal agents from snatching us off the streets… we will shout and sing at their doors from dusk until dawn and make them hear us.”
The deleted page also listed actual Sunrise “Wide Awake” actions, including actions targeting Mitch McConnell, Thom Tillis, Baltimore officials, and Cleveland figures.“We are wide awake and we’ll ensure that the architects of this death economy will be too.”
Yeah, but what about Trump and Epstein?????Back on the topic of the thread Flog keeps diverting us from. Another bastion of Leftist violence, the Wide Awakes, also advised Biden...
The Media Is Hiding Cole Allen's Ties To A Far-Left Group That Advised Biden. Now The Evidence Is Vanishing From Their Website.
The official narrative is dead wrong.
Why White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooter Cole Tomas Allen’s reported link to a group known as “The Wide Awakes” receiving such little scrutiny from the media?
The name is associated with an arts-and-music-adjacent activist collective that describes itself as a creative, pro-democracy movement inspired by the original Civil War-era Wide Awakes. That’s what the media wants you to believe.
But that cultural collective is not the only relevant use of the term: a mainstream progressive group’s own materials repeatedly reference “Wide Awakes” as a direct-action protest tactic. Including specifically targeting the tactic towards Hilton hotels, where the WHCD took place, due to their hospitality of ICE agents in Minnesota.
Though the artsy “Wide Awakes” have denied any affiliation with Allen, the media seems hesitant to probe any further. Given that the relationship was reported by Allen’s sister to law enforcement (read: highly credible), you’d think it would garner more interest. For even more proof, they’re also part of the No Kings movement, which Allen reportedly attended.
The real reason why not?
It leads back to mainstream left-wing donors, protest infrastructure and a coverup — including deleted webpages.
Enter the Sunrise Movement, the left-wing youth climate group that became famous for Green New Deal pressure campaigns and Democratic Party agitation. It has used “Wide Awakes” as the name of a direct-action protest tactic for years. The group revived the term in 2020, promoted “Wide Awake” actions against Republican politicians, and now uses the same language in a recent anti-ICE campaign targeting Hilton hotels.
Now, the same hotel chain whose Washington, D.C. property hosted the White House Correspondents’ Dinner
Sunrise Movement’s Democratic pipeline
Sunrise Movement is often presented as a youth climate group, but its influence has long extended into Democratic politics.
Its own website describes the group as “the climate revolution” and says it is building a movement around climate, housing, jobs, public transportation, and community power. L
InfluenceWatch notes that Sunrise “played a significant role in the early days of Joe Biden’s presidency” and reports that, according to The Hill, Sunrise had been in “regular contact” with Biden administration officials as Biden moved on environmental priorities, including halting Keystone XL construction and restricting fossil fuel activity on federal lands.
Sunrise also sits inside the familiar progressive funding architecture.
The Guardian reported in October 2025 that Sunrise had received $2.1 million from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations from 2019 to 2023.
Other reports have traced earlier Soros-linked funding. The Washington Free Beacon reported that Open Society Foundations gave $500,000 to Sunrise in 2019, and that Democracy PAC, described as heavily funded by Soros, contributed $250,000 to Sunrise’s political action committee in April 2020.
InfluenceWatch also lists 2019 grants to Sunrise Movement including $175,000 from Tides Advocacy and $28,750 from the Tides Foundation, placing Sunrise within the broader mainstream progressive donor infrastructure.
The deleted page Sunrise no longer shows the public
The strongest receipt is the one Sunrise appears to have deleted from its website.
Sunrise previously maintained a page titled “Summer 2020 — Wide Awake Actions” at a URL that now returns “Not Found / Error 404.”
What the archive shows is explosive.
The deleted page said Sunrise hubs around the country were “inspired by a century-old tactic developed by the Wide Awakes,” which it described as “a pre-civil war abolitionist movement of 100,000-500,000 young people demanding urgent action on slavery.”
Sunrise then explained the tactic: “This group gathered and made noise to make themselves impossible to ignore.”
Then came the modern adaptation. The now-deleted page declared:
And then the warning:
The deleted page also listed actual Sunrise “Wide Awake” actions, including actions targeting Mitch McConnell, Thom Tillis, Baltimore officials, and Cleveland figures.
Several pictures revealing protesters with signs glaring with “Wide awake” were also on the webpage.
Much more in the link, too long to post.
You’re fine with them shutting down the investigation. You don’t want any more information than you already have. You’d prefer to stay blissfully ignorant.Do explain what you mean, exactly, by obeyed?
I read the same news you do. I'm aware of the gyrations in messaging. But exactly how is it that I obeyed?
![]()
You’re fine with them shutting down the investigation. You don’t want any more information than you already have. You’d prefer to stay blissfully ignorant.
Obey means to comply with, follow, or carry out commands, rules, or instructions, often under authority. It entails acting in accordance with orders, laws, or, in some contexts, following natural, physical, or personal impulses.
Do explain what you mean, exactly, by obeyed?
I read the same news you do. I'm aware of the gyrations in messaging. But exactly how is it that I obeyed?
Oh, bullshit. Among other things you’ve defended redactions that went against the EFTA.As predicted, the response would be epic.
I'll state for the record again, as the board's reigning legal mind, you have no concept of the English language, as we have all witnessed - sadly for far too long. You don't even understand the definition of the word.
A). I've stated on this board, many times, that I want this investigated. You're wrong.
B). I've stated on this board, many times, I want ALL of the information released. You're wrong.
C). A retard cannot call someone else retarded.
Back to the point, nothing above has anything to with "obeying."
Now let's get back to the topic - the White House shooting - shall we DeflectorFlog?
I don't care if they build the ballroom or not, but using this event as a reason is stupid. The event could have been held at the Whitehouse if it wasn't torn down. Secondly it was held at a hotel which by all accounts security was terrible. The hotel could have easily been locked down much better. Allen rode a train from CA and checked into the hotel Friday with multiple guns. Not sure how that even happens at a place where multiple high ranking officials would be at. Third Trump went from his friends are paying for the ballroom to now trying to get tax payers to fund it while donors just pay for the fine ChinaIf he looks, walks and (talks like a democrat before he was elected) doesn’t mean he’s a democrat.
View attachment 17289
I don't care if they build the ballroom or not, but using this event as a reason is stupid. The event could have been held at the Whitehouse if it wasn't torn down. Secondly it was held at a hotel which by all accounts security was terrible. The hotel could have easily been locked down much better. Allen rode a train from CA and checked into the hotel Friday with multiple guns. Not sure how that even happens at a place where multiple high ranking officials would be at. Third Trump went from his friends are paying for the ballroom to now trying to get tax payers to fund it while donors just pay for the fine China
interesting that you highlight and pinpoint that the goobermint can not even protect its own, but to some here, we're to "obey" them and allow them to protect us from the millions of illegals they've allowed to walk across our borders.I don't care if they build the ballroom or not, but using this event as a reason is stupid. The event could have been held at the Whitehouse if it wasn't torn down. Secondly it was held at a hotel which by all accounts security was terrible. The hotel could have easily been locked down much better. Allen rode a train from CA and checked into the hotel Friday with multiple guns. Not sure how that even happens at a place where multiple high ranking officials would be at. Third Trump went from his friends are paying for the ballroom to now trying to get tax payers to fund it while donors just pay for the fine China
I think the govt is capable of protecting their own, just did not do it. Same with the butler incident. The one main strategic sight line to the president was left unguarded in butler. I can understand some places would be a security nightmare, but a hotel convention room and a field with just a couple buildings should not be difficult to secure. But you are correct I certainly don't trust the govt to protect us from anything reallyinteresting that you highlight and pinpoint that the goobermint can not even protect its own, but to some here, we're to "obey" them and allow them to protect us from the millions of illegals they've allowed to walk across our borders.
Oh, bullshit.
Among other things you’ve defended redactions that went against the EFTA.
no.No, it's not bullshit that you don't understand the word OBEY.
Defended is the wrong word - as usual. I explained what was agreed upon by the lawmakers, that the names of the innocent and any information that may expose them was to be redacted.
You having a problem with this is your internal butt hurt, but those were the rules.
correct. just as the goobermint stooges could very well close the border. thus making American tax-paying citizens safer in their own country, but instead want to take away our gun rights and ability to not only protect ourselves but also investigate where our paid tax money goes since it's not being used on the border or on the obvious low-hanging transportation infrastructure. imagine what they could get away with if they merely fixed the roads and closed the border.I think the govt is capable of protecting their own, just did not do it. Same with the butler incident. The one main strategic sight line to the president was left unguarded in butler. I can understand some places would be a security nightmare, but a hotel convention room and a field with just a couple buildings should not be difficult to secure. But you are correct I certainly don't trust the govt to protect us from anything really
correct. just as the goobermint stooges could very well close the border. thus making American tax-paying citizens safer in their own country, but instead want to take away our gun rights and ability to not only protect ourselves but also investigate where our paid tax money goes since it's not being used on the border or on the obvious low-hanging transportation infrastructure. imagine what they could get away with if they merely fixed the roads and closed the border.
Step out of your bubble, it’s keeping you clueless. In their redactions, the DOJ revealed names of victims, and concealed names of people who were not victims. Again, blissful ignorance with you.No, it's not bullshit that you don't understand the word OBEY.
Defended is the wrong word - as usual. I explained what was agreed upon by the lawmakers, that the names of the innocent and any information that may expose them was to be redacted.
You having a problem with this is your internal butt hurt, but those were the rules.
holy **** the irony.Step out of your bubble, it’s keeping you clueless.