Iran

[Tim Steelersfan]

2nd pilot may have been rescued. @Troglodyte weeps.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

My issue is the cost of those $30000 missions and what did we accomplish exactly. After all these missions Iran is still launching missiles, drones, and still has an air defense system. The regime is still the same just younger, Iran still has the uranium, control of the oil, and the people are still not free. Trump is acting like we have won, but we have barely accomplished anything. After 30000 missions you would think there would be no drones, missile launch sites, or IRGC left. I am just worried we have no end game or the end game will fall short of any real resolutions and we will be revisiting this in a couple years

If you're afraid of failure, you don't deserve to be successful - anonymous

 

[Superman]

2nd pilot may have been rescued. @Troglodyte weeps.

don't you dare bring @Tibs into this. He'll screech **** you in your face.

 

[Superman]

Nobody was discussing a hypothetical invasion of the U.S. prove me wrong.

so either you're saying one or the other:

1) any invasion by a foreign country would be damn near impossible geographically speaking
2) the only fear the American citizenry should have has is its own government
3) both 1 and 2

if 1, then no, the USA does not need NATO
if 2, then you're supporting 2A
if 3, you're finally seeing the light of day

if, somehow, you find a loophole in any of those three options, you're not smarter than a single digit Somalian retard.

psst... this was brought up in post 1,345

 

[steel dino]

What a great way for his family, friends, and our nation to start Easter Sunday!

We got him!

Amazing!

 

[Troglodyte]

No, you weren't guessing, you stated it as fact.

At the time, yesterday, when you made this statement, you were guessing.

You work yourself into an argumentative frenzy and don’t even remember what you’re arguing and what you’ve said and then accuse me of not being able to follow the argument. It just stupid with you.

 

[Troglodyte]

so either you're saying one or the other:

1) any invasion by a foreign country would be damn near impossible geographically speaking
2) the only fear the American citizenry should have has is its own government
3) both 1 and 2

if 1, then no, the USA does not need NATO
if 2, then you're supporting 2A
if 3, you're finally seeing the light of day

if, somehow, you find a loophole in any of those three options, you're not smarter than a single digit Somalian retard.

psst... this was brought up in post 1,345

No. Tim implied that U.S. citizens could rise up against the U.S. government and defeat its military. That’s ridiculous, juvenile fantasy. Then he really went off the rails. That’s all.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

You work yourself into an argumentative frenzy and don’t even remember what you’re arguing and what you’ve said and then accuse me of not being able to follow the argument. It just stupid with you.

You simply are unable to comprehend, aren't you?

I called you out for making it a "statement of fact" when (at the time) no one knew the facts and told you you were guessing.

You'd do well writing for HuffPo or ABC.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

No. Tim implied that U.S. citizens could rise up against the U.S. government and defeat its military. That’s ridiculous, juvenile fantasy. Then he really went off the rails. That’s all.

You have this uncanny ability to twist others' words wildly.

I said the 2A gives us a fighting chance and it's a shame the Iranians don't have it after you unconsciously threw out undeniable support for the 2A. That was the gem of this discussion.

Ever since, you've been trying to walk it back.

 

[BLITZ]

You have this uncanny ability to twist others' words wildly.

I said the 2A gives us a fighting chance and it's a shame the Iranians don't have it after you unconsciously threw out undeniable support for the 2A. That was the gem of this discussion.

Ever since, you've been trying to walk it back.

He just spouts **** out to get people of topic. It is thst simple.