- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,476
- Reaction score
- 16,096
- Points
- 113
The Epstein Problem
- Thread starter hamster
- Start date
Everyone here agrees with this, well, maybe not the guy that you can't figure out, but everyone else.
Never would have pictured you with a red beard. Nice
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,476
- Reaction score
- 16,096
- Points
- 113
Your instincts are correct. I have a soul.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,476
- Reaction score
- 16,096
- Points
- 113
Only pFlogtard would believe this:
She obviously didn't take her own advice about getting more done by doing more things.
This release of the files should shut up one @Troglodyte. It won't, but it should.
Former President Bill Clinton seen in a pool next to a person whose face has been redacted.
A person whose face has been redacted sits with her arm around former President Bill Clinton on a plane.
Ghislaine Maxwell (left), charged for recruiting underage girls for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to abuse, is seen in a pool alongside former President Bill Clinton.
Former President Bill Clinton seen in a pool next to a person whose face has been redacted.
A person whose face has been redacted sits with her arm around former President Bill Clinton on a plane.
Ghislaine Maxwell (left), charged for recruiting underage girls for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to abuse, is seen in a pool alongside former President Bill Clinton.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,969
- Reaction score
- 21,078
- Points
- 113
And none of that means anything. Look, they know who did what with whom. This kind of stuff is nonsense, a distraction. Our government, even under Trump, has a serious problem with telling the truth. They’ll continue to throw garbage out there for the ideological idiots that think it matters, meanwhile anything of any consequence is redacted or simply kept out of public view. It’s crap. Just release the ****, in full, victims names redacted. There needs to be a reckoning.
Send in The Duck!
That's what this supposedly is. All that is redacted - supposedly - are victim's names/images.
Not saying I believe that...
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,621
- Reaction score
- 6,591
- Points
- 113
Both parties are crying foul over the amount of redaction and this is your takeaway? Your true colors are shining through.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,621
- Reaction score
- 6,591
- Points
- 113
Your attempted walk back is pathetic. You were quick to reveal what’s important to you and what isn’t. You don’t care if Trumps DOJ is corrupt.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,621
- Reaction score
- 6,591
- Points
- 113
because parts of the Epstein files are ... i'm going to type this as slowly as I can, but I know you still won't understand ... remain under investigation.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,621
- Reaction score
- 6,591
- Points
- 113
Sure. That’s it. Those are very, very long lists of names.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 22,960
- Reaction score
- 27,089
- Points
- 113
Yeah, but the folks that need to be exposed aren't welders, plumbers or schoolteachers.
Power and money buy a lot of protection. Not saying that's right, just the reality of it.
The law that was signed by Trump, that was passed by Congress dictated that the victims names/faces not be released. This was done because the victims asked not to be named/identified due to fear of retribution from the guilty.
Assuming the redactions were done to this end, I support it. I don't want to see dozens of people suicided by those guilty in this shameful scheme. Do you?
LMAO that wasn't a walkback in the least. One would think you, the King, the Czar, the Heavy Weight Champion of The Walkback would better recognize one.
It was an explanation as to why so much was redacted. That's why words and phrases like "supposedly" and "if you believe that" were included in the response. Nor did my initial post say I believe 100% of this release. I simply said the release SHOULD shut you up. We can't be that fortunate however.
Floggy reading the news over his morning soy peppermint latte hoping Trump is shown in just one compromising photo...
Flogtard checking the news again while eating Ze's quiche for lunch....
Flogged watching the evening news...
Flogtard going to bed realizing The Epstein files are yet another dud in the never-ending attempts to oust DJT...
Flogtard checking the news again while eating Ze's quiche for lunch....
Flogged watching the evening news...
Flogtard going to bed realizing The Epstein files are yet another dud in the never-ending attempts to oust DJT...
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,621
- Reaction score
- 6,591
- Points
- 113
speaking of the names "ON" the list... care to discuss Bill Clinton?
wait. hold up.
this doesnt effect you, personally.
so why do you suddenly care so, since it doesnt begin to penetrate your bubble?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,621
- Reaction score
- 6,591
- Points
- 113
As I’ve said before, I don’t have a Clinton hat, flag, watch, bible, coin or any other nonsense that Trumptards purchase. I don’t care if he goes down, I don’t idolize or worship him. But… given that his image wasn't redacted, wouldn’t that suggest that he isn’t part of any criminal investigation?