• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Epstein Problem

I really don't get the back and forth. just my opinion but I feel that ANYONE that is fighting to keep all of the information from coming to light is hiding something. If I truly had zero to be worried about I would be screaming at the top of my lungs to get all this **** out in the open.

Where is my man DT with his sharpie? sign a **** ing executive order and make them release every ******* thing they have. you want to pardon Maxwell fine but only after she tells it all. enough of this **** already.. anyone involved in any way needs to rot in prison and I don't mean some cushy fed prison, I mean one of these Alabama **** holes.

This is CHILD rape. hang all these **** ers on national TV after they spend a few months getting **** ed in the ***.
 
Hey, Daffy. What is the odds the Epstein list is ever opened to the public?

1000000349.gif
 
Troglodyte said:
😂 The emails, his past behavior and the cover-up portray Trump as a pedophile. The media is just doing their job.
Click to expand...

Yeah, the media just doing their job.
Smearing Trump. And you bought into the media misinformation about Trump colluding with the Russians too.

Speaking of those emails.


The victim’s name blacked out in two of the emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate released by House Democrats on Wednesday is Virginia Giuffre, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told TIME in an email.

“The Democrats selectively leaked emails to the liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump. The ‘unnamed victim’ referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and ‘couldn’t have been friendlier’ to her in their limited interactions,” Leavitt wrote in a statement to TIME.
 
Last edited:
584659622_1156722433312638_646027075462491248_n.jpg
 
Hypocycloids said:
Yeah, the media just doing their job.
Smearing Trump. And you bought into the media misinformation about Trump colluding with the Russians too.

Speaking of those emails.


The victim’s name blacked out in two of the emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate released by House Democrats on Wednesday is Virginia Giuffre, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told TIME in an email.

“The Democrats selectively leaked emails to the liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump. The ‘unnamed victim’ referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and ‘couldn’t have been friendlier’ to her in their limited interactions,” Leavitt wrote in a statement to TIME.
Click to expand...
How is it misinformation? Leavitt exposing the identity of the victim is shameful. There’s never been a bigger kunt.
 
Troglodyte said:
How is it misinformation? Leavitt exposing the identity of the victim is shameful. There’s never been a bigger kunt.
Click to expand...
Exposing Virginia Giuffre’s identity? You mean the person who wrote a book about herself? Odd they would redact her name, maybe it has something to do with the fact that she testified under oath that he never behaved inappropriately with her or around her.
 
Troglodyte said:
How is it misinformation? Leavitt exposing the identity of the victim is shameful. There’s never been a bigger kunt.
Click to expand...
So cherry pick a word, fine.
Perhaps “deception” is the better word in this case.
To the point of my post…The redacted person, Guffrie had already testified that Trump had not behaved inappropriately.
…and there have been bigger kunts. And only democrats come to mind.
 
So Dershowitz was Epstein's lawyer. I've previously posted about him. He has perhaps the most inside information on this whole story. He's previously said he can prove Trump wasn't a part of this. He wants to share his files. And...A...Judge...Won't...Let...Him.

Let that sink in.

‘I Know What’s in Those Documents’: Alan Dershowitz Says He Has the Epstein Files, But Judges Are Blocking Their Release​


Alan Dershowitz, a former defense attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, said he wants to release “important” files on the dead sex criminal — and would happily turn them over to Piers Morgan — but judges are blocking him from doing so.

The famous lawyer, during an appearance on Piers Morgan Uncensored on Wednesday, pleaded directly to the camera and asked for the green light to release the documents.

“I have them in my possession, my lawyers have them. Judge, let me give them to Piers Morgan. I want to give them to Piers Morgan,” Dershowitz said. “Why, Judge, are you preventing me from disclosing material that would be very, very important in putting a whole picture on this thing?”

Mike Nellis, a “social impact entrepreneur” and former advisor to Kamala Harris, a moment earlier, pushed back on Dershowitz. He said the files Dershowitz has “represent about 3% of what would be considered the Epstein Files” and that the White House and Justice Department could “end this at any time” by releasing the vast majority of files.

Dershowitz pushed back on that claim.

“No, they can’t. It’ll never end as long as judges are sealing depositions,” he said.

He continued, “I know what’s in those documents! I know something you don’t know! I know what’s in those documents. That’s why it’s so important to get these judicial documents out there, if the judge will give me permission.”

Dershowitz then made his aforementioned plea.

Since Dershowitz provided legal representation to Epstein, his communications with the deceased convicted child sex predator would be covered by the attorney-client privilege, which cannot be waived by the attorney and does not end with a client’s death.

His appearance on Uncensored came hours after Democrats released emails where Epstein said President Donald Trump “spent a few hours” at his house, but was the “dog that hasn’t barked”; 20,000 pages of Epstein-related documents were released by the House Oversight Committee soon after.

“It’s been leaked here, [and] I have some sympathy for the White House, in a way that makes it look as damning as possible,” Morgan said at the beginning of the episode. “However — I think it’s an important ‘however’ — it’s certainly, on the face of it, it is stuff that, if I was the White House, I’d be pretty concerned.”

Dershowitz said “sure” because in 2025, the release equals “guilt by accusation.”

He then said he talked to Epstein about Trump between 2006 and 2007, and that Epstein “never” said Trump was involved in improper conduct.

Dershowitz said he told Epstein:

Can you name people who may have had sexual relationships with anybody, and if we can turn those people over to the government, we can maybe get you a better deal. And then I went through a variety of names, including Donald Trump! And Jeffrey Epstein said ‘No, Trump didn’t do anything wrong. I can’t say anything about him that would be helpful to the government, even if the government wanted to get him.
Click to expand...

He added the calls for the White House to release files tied to Epstein fail to consider the role judges are playing in keeping them sealed.

“It’s not the White House that’s keeping a lot of the most important material out,” Dershowitz said. “It’s judges — three federal judges in New York have sealed depositions. I want those depositions out there!”
 
Troglodyte said:
How is it misinformation? Leavitt exposing the identity of the victim is shameful. There’s never been a bigger kunt.
Click to expand...
Dude, you're kind of a tool. She is dead, there is no privacy to protect. The only reason the dems redacted her name at all is because their bullshit narrative didn't work if people knew the words were her's. It was a lie by omission on the dem's part, and your outrage shows how misinformed and easily led you and most libs are.
 
Troglodyte said:
Crickets from @Superman. Coward.
Click to expand...
LOL - you calling someone a coward for not answering a direct question. Meanwhile, I've directly answered any question you've posed.

Yes at some point there will be a a majority vote to release the Epstein files. I'm not going to split hairs with you over the Dems' votes, but I am hoping that the pedo list is released - and damn whomever is listed as a contributor or player in these.

Though, will you roll back your unbridled lunacy if it is proven Trump was not a participant?

i'd have to consider that as well connected as Epstein was (or still is) to the big heads in NYC and the global financial world that it would be understandable for people to be linked to him. Though I'd also believe the number of people who were willing and repeat participants in his smaller world of pedophilia and child sex trafficking is a lot smaller.
 
 
Troglodyte said:
How is it misinformation? Leavitt exposing the identity of the victim is shameful. There’s never been a bigger kunt.
Click to expand...
The Democrats redacted her name. She’s dead. She’s already been on record numerous times about Trump, Epstein, your idol and Bill Gates. See my previous post.
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top