- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,705
- Reaction score
- 6,343
- Points
- 113
You and Tibs should go bowling. Tranny bowling. It’ll be fun! Bring your high heels.
Again, who is sowing hatred and division? It's motherf*ckers like you.
You and Tibs should go bowling. Tranny bowling. It’ll be fun! Bring your high heels.
Naw, I'll admit Indy can be a little forceful in his opinions, but it's the left that labels anyone that voted for the Hitler Trump as a fascist, bigot, racist, (fill in the blank) phobic, with no basis other than inuendo and parroting from what was heard or seen in the MSM or liberal social sights.Again, who is sowing hatred and division? It's motherf*ckers like you.
Naw, I'll admit Indy can be a little forceful in his opinions, but it's the left that labels anyone that voted for the Hitler Trump as a fascist, bigot, racist, (fill in the blank) phobic, with no basis other than inuendo and parroting from what was heard or seen in the MSM or liberal social sights.
It's time to stop the hateful rhetoric, because there are lunatics out there that will take your comments literally.
(Reuters) - Eight years ago, in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election, JD Vance was a bitter critic of Donald Trump. Publicly, he called the Republican businessman an "idiot" and said he was "reprehensible." Privately, he compared him to Adolf Hitler.
Because they can't win arguments intellectually. Or elections.Naw, I'll admit Indy can be a little forceful in his opinions, but it's the left that labels anyone that voted for the Hitler Trump as a fascist, bigot, racist, (fill in the blank) phobic, with no basis other than inuendo and parroting from what was heard or seen in the MSM or liberal social sights.
It's time to stop the hateful rhetoric, because there are lunatics out there that will take your comments literally.
Hatred? I was playing matchmaker so you two retards can live happily ever after.Again, who is sowing hatred and division? It's motherf*ckers like you.
who was it that corrected Vance in his view of Trump and showed Vance the way?Agreed, it was high time they reeled in the unhinged Trump-critic, flaming leftist-liberal JD Vance. The gall!
who was it that corrected Vance in his view of Trump and showed Vance the way?
Common sense. Not listening to sycophants like you.who was it that corrected Vance in his view of Trump and showed Vance the way?
Sigh!Agreed, it was high time they reeled in the unhinged Trump-critic, flaming leftist-liberal JD Vance. The gall!
You and Tibs should go bowling. Tranny bowling. It’ll be fun! Bring your high heels.
Tibs that's not hatred. That's the way most friends in the trades greet each other. And what Indy posted was quite mild.Again, who is sowing hatred and division? It's motherf*ckers like you.
You are unable to avoid being a smarmy fuucktardCharlie Kirk and Peter Thiel, among others. Not quite sure everything is as you think it is, with JD Vance & Donald Trump. But that's a different story for a different time.
You mean like motherf*ckers laughing at Charlie Kirk being "Darwin'd"?
Because they can't win arguments intellectually. Or elections.
I'll play devil's advocate here, if for nothing other than clarification.I guess I'll add this here as well for posterity, as you go diving down rabbit holes making an utter fool of yourself.
======================================================
It's truly painful how dumb and desperate you are. So now you're pulling random posts off my TwitterX page to try to made some harebrained point here on the Steeler Nation message board? A post that has zero reference to Charlie Kirk, and has absolutely nothing to do with Charlie Kirk? You, sir, have spiraled into madness.
I am glad you follow me on social media, it's an honor. For your information, only a single post of mine on Sept 10th had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's assassination.
No, it wasn't my whimsical post about Charles Darwin being ill-tempered in the mid-19th century, nor my post on Swiss painter Luigi Monteverde, highlighting some of his paintings, nor my post featuring nature photography from a forest near the Rhine river in Brohl, Germany, nor the colorful, high-resolution photograph of the Pamir Mountains in Tajikistan.
I can assure you, none of those posts on September 10th were concerning the sad, tragic passing of Charlie Kirk.
The single post that I did write on the subject, having chosen to completely steer clear of commenting on it, was this one. Have a lovely day, Tim.
View attachment 15129
I'll play devil's advocate here, if for nothing other than clarification.
Are you quoting MLK "Violence never really deals with the basic evil of the situation", implying to me at least, that there was a situation of evil that someone responded to with violence? If so, what was the evil of the situation?
It is always a descending spiral leading nowhere. This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe. It doesn’t solve any problems.”
Zona, I considered the quote in its entirety, and focused on the end, not the beginning, as a general, and eternal, message calling for non-violence.
Fair enough, just thought the opening sentence was out of place regarding the murder of Kirk.Zona, I considered the quote in its entirety, and focused on the end, not the beginning, as a general, and eternal, message calling for non-violence.
I guess I'll add this here as well for posterity, as you go diving down rabbit holes making an utter fool of yourself.
======================================================
It's truly painful how dumb and desperate you are. So now you're pulling random posts off my TwitterX page to try to made some harebrained point here on the Steeler Nation message board? A post that has zero reference to Charlie Kirk, and has absolutely nothing to do with Charlie Kirk? You, sir, have spiraled into madness.
I am glad you follow me on social media, it's an honor. For your information, only a single post of mine on Sept 10th had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's assassination.
No, it wasn't my whimsical post about Charles Darwin being ill-tempered in the mid-19th century, nor my post on Swiss painter Luigi Monteverde, highlighting some of his paintings, nor my post featuring nature photography from a forest near the Rhine river in Brohl, Germany, nor the colorful, high-resolution photograph of the Pamir Mountains in Tajikistan.
I can assure you, none of those posts on September 10th were concerning the sad, tragic passing of Charlie Kirk.
The single post that I did write on the subject, having chosen to completely steer clear of commenting on it, was this one. Have a lovely day, Tim.
View attachment 15129
I guess I'll add this here as well for posterity, as you go diving down rabbit holes making an utter fool of yourself.
======================================================
It's truly painful how dumb and desperate you are. So now you're pulling random posts off my TwitterX page to try to made some harebrained point here on the Steeler Nation message board? A post that has zero reference to Charlie Kirk, and has absolutely nothing to do with Charlie Kirk? You, sir, have spiraled into madness.
I am glad you follow me on social media, it's an honor. For your information, only a single post of mine on Sept 10th had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's assassination.
No, it wasn't my whimsical post about Charles Darwin being ill-tempered in the mid-19th century, nor my post on Swiss painter Luigi Monteverde, highlighting some of his paintings, nor my post featuring nature photography from a forest near the Rhine river in Brohl, Germany, nor the colorful, high-resolution photograph of the Pamir Mountains in Tajikistan.
I can assure you, none of those posts on September 10th were concerning the sad, tragic passing of Charlie Kirk.
The single post that I did write on the subject, having chosen to completely steer clear of commenting on it, was this one. Have a lovely day, Tim.
View attachment 15129
Clearly not Kamala Harris. 5 million votes.From the people doing their own medical research via social media. Who can compete with the intellect of Donald Trump?
She crushed him. People voted for the guy talking about immigrants eating dogs. Never underestimate the stupidity of the American people.Clearly not Kamala Harris. 5 million votes.