- Joined
- Apr 17, 2014
- Messages
- 4,757
- Reaction score
- 2,715
- Points
- 113
Guys I'm pretty sure the "Graham" referred to above was Brandon, not Jimmy
We don't need to make a big splash in free agency. How well has that worked out over the years for Washington, Oakland and Philly? Like I've said several times already, I long for the days that we had boring drafts. O-lineman in the first two or 3 rounds and then BPA after that and develop them. Problem is, our player development under Tombert sucks balls. THAT is what needs to change.
If you look back to the article about big free agents and also include the trade for the Bus you can see we were players in free agency for a while. We did not go crazy with it and attempt to buy a team but we did pick some higher quality players than we have done so in the last few years. Those players were starters and very good ones and were difference makers for the team. That with solid draft picks allowed us to get to some of the super bowls we were in. I suspect that to do it only by drafting players will have us repeating the 80s.
Adding quality free agents was the difference between what Bill did and what Chuck did. To get the team you need now will take both methods, otherwise the players you draft become free agents faster than you can replace them or are out of the game before you can draft enough good ones.
I also don't think they need to try and go crazy but generally under the time period in the article we signed one or two players that were good starters for at least two or three years some much longer. All we have been picking up lately say last 5 years have been role players at best and usually depth players. When one considers the talent that we had on defense that was better than what we were signing it is really missing on both the draft and free agency. Not freeing up money early took us out of the free agency hunt and we could have used a good player from there.
I consider failing to get one of the prospects that others had talked about on here that went in the under 6 million range a major loss early in the season.
We don't need to make a big splash in free agency. How well has that worked out over the years for Washington, Oakland and Philly? Like I've said several times already, I long for the days that we had boring drafts. O-lineman in the first two or 3 rounds and then BPA after that and develop them. Problem is, our player development under Tombert sucks balls. THAT is what needs to change.
We don't need to make a big splash in free agency. How well has that worked out over the years for Washington, Oakland and Philly? Like I've said several times already, I long for the days that we had boring drafts. O-lineman in the first two or 3 rounds and then BPA after that and develop them. Problem is, our DEFENSIVE player development under Tombert sucks balls. THAT is what needs to change.
since when have champions been made in the offseason based on fa transactions ? And whats the frequency of teams that make huge free agency splashes going on to win championships ? Raiders, skins, dolphins, eagles all make huge moves every offseason.....how many championships ? None.
Theres something special brewing with this offense...its young, talented and explosive...now, we focus on defense. And hope we can plug deficiencies and make a run for this 7th title the next three or four years.......i like where we are right now. Afc north champs, expecting even better things next year. Optimism...**** this pessimistic bs. This aint ****** cleveland.
I'm glad you noted the "present" shape of the team ... It's March, too early for the sky to be falling on any NFL team (except the Browns). Hopefully they make some moves to help on defense, but the offense except for back-up RB is fine. Now, if the constitution of the team is the same at the end of camp and we have not found any reason to be encouraged by the growth in JJ, Shazier, Allen and/or a few of the others, I'll agree then that the sky is probably getting a lil too close for comfort.
Less than one week into FA, the Steelers never look like they have improved. We all know they never make a big splash in FA. This year is no different. Wait until after the draft and then we can talk a little about if they have improved.
Offense should be better, defense is still hurting with no pass rush and no secondary to make up for that, still have a head coach that has not shown he can have team ready to play in games we should win.
Steelers are currently ranked #7 on NFL.com's power rankings.
Not sure where I rank my expected 9-7 with a tough schedule.
As I've said all along there are so many teams in this "group" that could be anywhere from 8-8 to 11-5 (or even 12-4) that are really pretenders and not contenders. I think under the leadership of Colbert and Tomlin this team has turned from a contender into a pretender.
That doesn't mean we're "bad". There are a lot of poorly run franchises out there with no quarterback that act like they're good. Our stability and QB should guarantee us 8-8 just because 1/3 the league is being run by monkeys (not racist, I swear).
That's why I'm so critical of 8-8 and missing the playoffs with this group. How is that even possible when you look around the league and see all the totally inept decisions being made? How is that possible when teams are spending like "this is the year" when they have quarterbacks like Matt Cassel and Geno Smith and Ryan Tannehill and are in the same division as Tom ******* Brady?
Christ.... my 8-year old son with 3 months training could do a better job than some of these GM's. What a bunch of horse manure.
We are what we are. Flawed. Holes. Good offense. Hope for the right run at the right time. But a great team? That's laughable.
I'm trying to think of a great draft we've had in the past 8 years. Somebody help me out here.With a GREAT draft we easily could jump up to the top 5.![]()
I'm trying to think of a great draft we've had in the Colbert era. Somebody help me out here.