While the Left is busy pushing the baseless accusation of a Republican war on women, there is one piece of history that they are trying to bury as insignificant since it speaks volumes as to a center figure who leads the charge in their own war on any women who get in the way of their agenda or quest for power. Hillary Clinton.
Hillary has a history of shaming women and attacking them if they dare cross her or her husband in their quest for power. She is responsible for crafting the ‘nuts and *****’ campaign against the women who came forward as victims of her husband Bill’s philandering. She placed the finger of blame for her husband taking advantage of an intern, Monica Lewinsky, while he was president on the victim herself, Lewinsky. It’s a tactic that she turns to in order to discredit the victim.
As Hillary is witnessing her popularity level decrease simultaneous with the disastrous sales of her book, new tapes have emerged that not only show Hillary disparaging and blaming the victim of rape, but laughing about it. That victim just so happens to be a 12-year old girl.
The Washington Free Beacon reports on the audiotapes they unearthed that feature Hillary speaking about the rape of the 12-year old that occurred on May 10, 1975. The suspect was a 41-year old man who Hillary, at the age of 27, represented. This discussion, callous in nature, was between Hillary Clinton and Arkansas reporter Roy Reed for a magazine article which was never actually written. The interview took place approximately 10 years after the rape case.
Clinton talks and laughs about how the suspect requested a female attorney as well his the fact that he failed a lie detector test, an admission that breaks client-attorney privilege. The Free Beacon details some of the other aspects of the case, including Hillary Clinton’s attack on the personal character of the 12-year old female victim, who was fed whisky and coke by the suspect prior to the rape.
According to court documents, the prosecution’s case was based on testimony from the 12-year-old girl and the two male witnesses as well as on a “pair of men’s undershorts taken from the defendant herein.”
In a July 28, 1975, court affidavit, Clinton wrote that she had been informed the young girl was “emotionally unstable” and had a “tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing.”
“I have also been told by an expert in child psychology that children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents in disorganized families, such as the complainant’s, are even more prone to exaggerate behavior,” Clinton said.
Clinton said the child had “in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body” and that the girl “exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”
But the interview reveals that an error by the prosecution would render unnecessary these attacks on the credibility of a 12-year-old rape victim.
In a real war on women, the woman being presently pushed by the Democrat party as their next attempt to ‘make history’ by electing a female president ruined the life of that young girl with the tactics she employed to win her case. The Free Beacon reports that the victim, now 52-years old, is divorced and living alone. Although the actual events and what transpired afterwards has been whitewashed by the Clinton camp, including a claim by Newsday in 2008 that she ‘harbored no ill will toward Clinton,” the victim says that is not true.
According to the victim, who spent time in prison for check forgery, a crime she committed, to feed her addiction to methamphetamines, the report of ‘no ill will’ by Newsday was not true. She not only has deep and abiding hostility towards that reporter, but also towards the woman who soiled her name and reputation, victimizing her once again after her rape – Hillary Rodham Clinton.
